Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Johan Margono

dblp:20/288 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software reuse
0.011992
Software Reuse Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis on a Large-Scale Ada Project · ICSE 1992
Empirical software engineering › software economics
cost-benefit analysis
0.011992
Software Reuse Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis on a Large-Scale Ada Project · ICSE 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reuse economics models · 0.0cost/benefit tracking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Software Reuse Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis on a Large-Scale Ada Project
abstract
The software industry is painfully realizing that a software reuse effor~if not carefully planned and properly carried out, oftentimes becomes an inhibitor rather than a catalyst to software productivity and quality.Despite numerous articles in the areas of domain analysis, component classit3cation, automated component storage/retrieval tools, reuse metrics, etc., only a handful have managed to address the economics of software reuse.In order to be successful, not only must a reuse program be technically sound, itmust also be econondcally worthwhile.After all, reducing costs and increasing quality were the two main factors that drove software reuse into the software mainstream.This paper presents a number of reuse economics models used to perform an economic assessment of a reuse effort on a large-scale Ada projecti the United States Federal Aviation Administration's Advanced Automation System (FAA/AAS).Reuse economics models, cost/benefit tracking methods, and reuse catalysts/inhibitors are addressed.
Johan Margono, Thomas E. Rhoads
ICSE1