Type errors in Python often lead to runtime failures, posing significant challenges to software reliability and developer productivity. Existing static analysis tools aim to detect such errors without execution but frequently suffer from high false positive rates. Recently, unit test generation techniques offer great promise in achieving high test coverage, but they often struggle to produce bug-revealing tests without tailored guidance. To address these limitations, we present rTED, a novel type-aware test generation technique for automatically detecting Python type errors. Specifically, rTED combines step-by-step type constraint analysis with reflective validation to guide the test generation process and effectively suppress false positives. We evaluated rTED on two widely-used benchmarks, BugsInPy and TypeBugs. Experimental results show that rTED can detect 22 ∼ 29 more benchmarked type errors than four state-of-the-art techniques. rTED is also capable of producing fewer false positives, achieving an improvement of 173.9%∼245.9% in precision. Furthermore, we applied rTED to six real-world open-source Python projects, and successfully discovered 12 previously unknown type errors, demonstrating rTED’s practical value.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled promising performance in unit test generation through in-context learning (ICL). However, the quality of in-context examples significantly influences the effectiveness of generated tests—poorly structured or semantically unclear test examples often lead to suboptimal outputs. In this paper, we propose CLAST, a novel technique that systematically refines unit tests to improve their semantic clarity, thereby enhancing their utility as in-context examples. The approach decomposes complex tests into logically clearer ones and improves semantic clarity through a combination of program analysis and LLM-based rewriting. We evaluated CLAST on four open-source and three industrial projects. The results demonstrate that CLAST largely outperforms UTgen, the state-of-the-art refinement technique, in both preserving test effectiveness and enhancing semantic clarity. Specifically, CLAST fully retains the original effectiveness of unit tests, while UTgen reduces compilation success rate (CSR), pass rate (PR), test coverage (Cov), and mutation score (MS) by an average of 12.90%, 35.82%, 4.65%, and 5.07%, respectively. Over 85.33% of participants in our user study preferred the semantic clarity of CLAST-refined tests. Notably, incorporating CLAST-refined tests as examples effectively improves ICL-based unit test generation approaches such as RAGGen and TELPA, resulting in an average increase of 25.97% in CSR, 28.22% in PR, and 45.99% in Cov for generated tests, compared to incorporating UTgen-refined tests. The insights from the follow-up user study not only reinforce CLAST’s potential impact in software testing practice but also illuminate avenues for future research.

Unit testing is an essential activity in software development for verifying the correctness of software components. However, manually writing unit tests is challenging and time-consuming. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a new direction for automating unit test generation. Existing research primarily focuses on closed-source LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT and CodeX) with fixed prompting strategies, leaving the capabilities of advanced open-source LLMs with various prompting settings unexplored. Particularly, open-source LLMs offer advantages in data privacy protection and have demonstrated superior performance in some tasks. Moreover, effective prompting is crucial for maximizing LLMs' capabilities. In this paper, we conduct the first empirical study to fill this gap, based on 17 Java projects, five widely-used open-source LLMs with different structures and parameter sizes, and comprehensive evaluation metrics. Our findings highlight the significant influence of various prompt factors, show the performance of open-source LLMs compared to the commercial GPT-4 and the traditional Evosuite, and identify limitations in LLM-based unit test generation. We then derive a series of implications from our study to guide future research and practical use of LLM-based unit test generation.

With the rapid development of deep learning (DL), the recent trend of log-based anomaly detection focuses on extracting semantic information from log events (i.e., templates of log messages) and designing more advanced DL models for anomaly detection. Indeed, the effectiveness of log-based anomaly detection can be improved, but these DL-based techniques further suffer from the limitations of more heavy dependency on training data (such as data quality or data labels) and higher costs in time and resources due to the complexity and scale of DL models, which hinder their practical use. On the contrary, the techniques based on traditional machine learning or data mining algorithms are less dependent on training data and more efficient but produce worse effectiveness than DL-based techniques, which is mainly caused by the problem of unseen log events (some log events in incoming log messages are unseen in training data) confirmed by our motivating study. Intuitively, if we can improve the effectiveness of traditional techniques to be comparable with advanced DL-based techniques, then log-based anomaly detection can be more practical. Indeed, an existing study in the other area (i.e., linking questions posted on Stack Overflow) has pointed out that traditional techniques with some optimizations can indeed achieve comparable effectiveness with the state-of-the-art DL-based technique, indicating the feasibility of enhancing traditional log-based anomaly detection techniques to some degree. Inspired by the idea of “try-with-simpler,” we conducted the first empirical study to explore the potential of improving traditional techniques for more practical log-based anomaly detection. In this work, we optimized the traditional unsupervised PCA (Principal Component Analysis) technique by incorporating a lightweight semantic-based log representation in it, called SemPCA , and conducted an extensive study to investigate the potential of SemPCA for more practical log-based anomaly detection. By comparing seven log-based anomaly detection techniques (including four DL-based techniques, two traditional techniques, and SemPCA ) on both public and industrial datasets, our results show that SemPCA achieves comparable effectiveness as advanced supervised/semi-supervised DL-based techniques while being much more stable under insufficient training data and more efficient, demonstrating that the traditional technique can still excel after small but useful adaptation.

Test case prioritization (TCP) aims to schedule the execution order of test cases for earlier fault detection. A recent study has demonstrated that the information-retrieval-based (IR-based) TCP approaches achieve the state-of-the-art effectiveness. The current IR-based TCP approaches leverage lexical similarity between test cases and code changes to guide TCP while ignoring rich code semantics, which may limit their effectiveness to some degree. In this paper, we conduct the first study to explore whether code semantic information can further boost IR-based TCP. Here, we studied two types of code representation methods (i.e., general-purpose and task-associated models) and explored two modes of utilizing the code representation embeddings (i.e., unsupervised and supervised modes) for IR-based TCP. Our results demonstrate that incorporating code semantics through the supervised mode of code representation can achieve a 16.96% improvement in the efficiency of fault detection over the state-of-the-art IR-based TCP approach (which is based on lexical similarity).

With the growth of software systems, logs have become an important data to aid system maintenance. Log-based anomaly detection is one of the most important methods for such purpose, which aims to automatically detect system anomalies via log analysis. However, existing log-based anomaly detection approaches still suffer from practical issues due to either depending on a large amount of manually labeled training data (supervised approaches) or unsatisfactory performance without learning the knowledge on historical anomalies (unsupervised and semi-supervised approaches). In this paper, we propose a novel practical log-based anomaly detection approach, PLELog, which is semi-supervised to get rid of time-consuming manual labeling and incorporates the knowledge on historical anomalies via probabilistic label estimation to bring supervised approaches' superiority into play. In addition, PLELog is able to stay immune to unstable log data via semantic embedding and detect anomalies efficiently and effectively by designing an attention-based GRU neural network. We evaluated PLELog on two most widely-used public datasets, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of PLELog, significantly outperforming the compared approaches with an average of 181.6% improvement in terms of F1-score. In particular, PLELog has been applied to two real-world systems from our university and a large corporation, further demonstrating its practicability

Online service systems may encounter a large number of incidents, which should be mitigated as soon as possible to minimize the service disruption time and ensure high service availability. The ability to predict TTM (Time To Mitigation) of incidents can help service teams better organize the mainte-nance efforts. Although there are many traditional bug-fixing time prediction methods, we find that there are not readily available for incident- TTM prediction due to the characteristics of incidents. To better understand how incidents are mitigated, we conduct the first empirical study of incident TTM on 20 large-scale online service systems in Microsoft. We investigate the time distribution in the main stages of the incident life cycle and explore factors affecting TTM. Based on our empirical findings, we propose TTMPred, a deep-learning-based approach for incident- TTM prediction in a continuous triage scenario. Our model designs a two-level attention-based bidirectional GRU model to capture both the semantic information in text data and the temporal information in incremental discussions. And based on a novel continuous loss function, it builds a regression model to achieve accurate TTM prediction as much as possible at each time point of prediction. Our experiments on four large-scale online service systems in Microsoft show that TTMPred is effective and significantly outperforms the compared approaches. For example, TTMPred improves the state-of-the-art regression-based approach by 25.66% on average in terms of MAE (Mean Absolute Error).