Albert V. van den Berg

dblp:20/3389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.012001
Receptive field structure of flow detectors for heading perception · NIPS 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › sensory processing
visual motion processing
0.012001
Receptive field structure of flow detectors for heading perception · NIPS 2001
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.012001
Receptive field structure of flow detectors for heading perception · NIPS 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

receptive field analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Receptive field structure of flow detectors for heading perception
abstract
Observer translation relative to the world creates image flow that expands from the observer's direction of translation (heading) from which the observer can recover heading direction. Yet, the image flow is often more complex, depending on rotation of the eye, scene layout and translation velocity. A number of models [1-4] have been proposed on how the human visual system extracts heading from flow in a neurophysiologic ally plausible way. These models represent heading by a set of neurons that respond to large image flow patterns and receive input from motion sensed at different im(cid:173) age locations. We analysed these models to determine the exact receptive field of these heading detectors. We find most models predict that, contrary to widespread believe, the contribut ing mo(cid:173) tion sensors have a preferred motion directed circularly rather than radially around the detector's preferred heading. Moreover, the re(cid:173) sults suggest to look for more refined structure within the circular flow, such as bi-circularity or local motion-opponency.
Jaap A. Beintema, Albert V. van den Berg, Markus Lappe
NIPS2