Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Elizabeth H. Slate

dblp:20/3934 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0001-6372-5277ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 91% Medical and health informatics · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
gene-gene interaction
0.112010
Logic Forest: an ensemble classifier for discovering logical combinations of binary markers · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
0.112010
Logic Forest: an ensemble classifier for discovering logical combinations of binary markers · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.112010
Logic Forest: an ensemble classifier for discovering logical combinations of binary markers · Bioinform. 2010
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
disease risk prediction
0.012010
Logic Forest: an ensemble classifier for discovering logical combinations of binary markers · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logic regression · 0.1logic forest · 0.1ensemble classifier · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Consistent Differential Expression Pattern (CDEP) on microarray to identify genes related to metastatic behavior
abstract
BACKGROUND: To utilize the large volume of gene expression information generated from different microarray experiments, several meta-analysis techniques have been developed. Despite these efforts, there remain significant challenges to effectively increasing the statistical power and decreasing the Type I error rate while pooling the heterogeneous datasets from public resources. The objective of this study is to develop a novel meta-analysis approach, Consistent Differential Expression Pattern (CDEP), to identify genes with common differential expression patterns across different datasets. RESULTS: We combined False Discovery Rate (FDR) estimation and the non-parametric RankProd approach to estimate the Type I error rate in each microarray dataset of the meta-analysis. These Type I error rates from all datasets were then used to identify genes with common differential expression patterns. Our simulation study showed that CDEP achieved higher statistical power and maintained low Type I error rate when compared with two recently proposed meta-analysis approaches. We applied CDEP to analyze microarray data from different laboratories that compared transcription profiles between metastatic and primary cancer of different types. Many genes identified as differentially expressed consistently across different cancer types are in pathways related to metastatic behavior, such as ECM-receptor interaction, focal adhesion, and blood vessel development. We also identified novel genes such as AMIGO2, Gem, and CXCL11 that have not been shown to associate with, but may play roles in, metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: CDEP is a flexible approach that borrows information from each dataset in a meta-analysis in order to identify genes being differentially expressed consistently. We have shown that CDEP can gain higher statistical power than other existing approaches under a variety of settings considered in the simulation study, suggesting its robustness and insensitivity to data variation commonly associated with microarray experiments. AVAILABILITY: CDEP is implemented in R and freely available at: http://genomebioinfo.musc.edu/CDEP/. CONTACT: [email protected].
Lam C. Tsoi, Tingting Qin, Elizabeth H. Slate, W. Jim Zheng
BMC Bioinform.3
2010 Logic Forest: an ensemble classifier for discovering logical combinations of binary markers
abstract
MOTIVATION: Highly sensitive and specific screening tools may reduce disease -related mortality by enabling physicians to diagnose diseases in asymptomatic patients or at-risk individuals. Diagnostic tests based on multiple biomarkers may achieve the needed sensitivity and specificity to realize this clinical gain. RESULTS: Logic regression, a multivariable regression method predicting an outcome using logical combinations of binary predictors, yields interpretable models of the complex interactions in biologic systems. However, its performance degrades in noisy data. We extend logic regression for classification to an ensemble of logic trees (Logic Forest, LF). We conduct simulation studies comparing the ability of logic regression and LF to identify variable interactions predictive of disease status. Our findings indicate LF is superior to logic regression for identifying important predictors. We apply our method to single nucleotide polymorphism data to determine associations of genetic and health factors with periodontal disease. AVAILABILITY: LF code is publicly available on CRAN, http://cran.r-project.org/.
Bethany J. Wolf, Elizabeth G. Hill, Elizabeth H. Slate
Bioinform.3
2006 A multivariate prediction model for microarray cross-hybridization
abstract
BACKGROUND: Expression microarray analysis is one of the most popular molecular diagnostic techniques in the post-genomic era. However, this technique faces the fundamental problem of potential cross-hybridization. This is a pervasive problem for both oligonucleotide and cDNA microarrays; it is considered particularly problematic for the latter. No comprehensive multivariate predictive modeling has been performed to understand how multiple variables contribute to (cross-) hybridization. RESULTS: We propose a systematic search strategy using multiple multivariate models [multiple linear regressions, regression trees, and artificial neural network analyses (ANNs)] to select an effective set of predictors for hybridization. We validate this approach on a set of DNA microarrays with cytochrome p450 family genes. The performance of our multiple multivariate models is compared with that of a recently proposed third-order polynomial regression method that uses percent identity as the sole predictor. All multivariate models agree that the 'most contiguous base pairs between probe and target sequences,' rather than percent identity, is the best univariate predictor. The predictive power is improved by inclusion of additional nonlinear effects, in particular target GC content, when regression trees or ANNs are used. CONCLUSION: A systematic multivariate approach is provided to assess the importance of multiple sequence features for hybridization and of relationships among these features. This approach can easily be applied to larger datasets. This will allow future developments of generalized hybridization models that will be able to correct for false-positive cross-hybridization signals in expression experiments.
Yian Ann Chen, Cheng-Chung Chou, Elizabeth H. Slate, Konan Peck, Wenying Xu, Eberhard O. Voit, Jonas S. Almeida
BMC Bioinform.4