Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur E. Feather
dblp:20/5057
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image correlation |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Parallel Processing Approaches to Image Correlation · IEEE Trans. Computers 1982 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
asymptotic complexity analysis · 0.0SIMD parallelism · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | Parallel Processing Approaches to Image CorrelationabstractImage correlation is representative of a wide variety of window-based image processing tasks. The way in which multimi-croprocessor systems (e.g., PASM) can use SIMD parallelism to perform image correlation is examined. Two fundamental algorithm strategies are explored. In one approach, all of the data that will be needed in a processor are transferred to the processor and operated on there. In the other, each processor performs all possible operations on its local data, generating partial results which are then transferred to the processor in which they are needed. The "time/space/inter-processor-transfer" complexities of the two algorithm approaches are analyzed in order to quantify the differences resulting from the two -strategies. For both approaches, the asymptotic time complexity of the N-processor SIMD algorithms is (1/N)th that of the corresponding serial algorithms. Leah J. Siegel, Howard Jay Siegel, Arthur E. Feather |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 3 |