Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liang Wu 0015
dblp:20/5233-15
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7210-9107ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 52% Optimization for machine learning · 42% Representation and self-supervised learning · 6% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.9 | 3 | 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise Learning · AAAI 2025 Stability and Generalization for Randomized Coordinate Descent · IJCAI 2021 Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-Valued Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise Learning · AAAI 2025 Stability and Generalization for Randomized Coordinate Descent · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
stochastic coordinate descent |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise Learning · AAAI 2025 Stability and Generalization for Randomized Coordinate Descent · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
stability and generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
algorithmic stability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Stability and Generalization for Randomized Coordinate Descent · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-Valued Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-Valued Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
vector-valued learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-Valued Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
excess risk bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
early stopping · 1.4algorithmic stability · 1.4regularization · 0.5empirical risk minimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Regression-based multisource conditional domain adaptation for policy outcome prediction
Caijia Zhu, Liang Wu 0015, Desheng Zheng, Fengmao Lv |
Neural Networks | 3 |
| 2025 | Stability-based Generalization Analysis of Randomized Coordinate Descent for Pairwise LearningabstractPairwise learning includes various machine learning tasks, with ranking and metric learning serving as the primary representatives. While randomized coordinate descent (RCD) is popular in various problems, there is much less theoretical analysis on the generalization behavior of models trained by RCD, especially under the pairwise learning framework. In this paper, we consider the generalization of RCD for pairwise learning. We measure the on-average argument stability for both convex and strongly convex objective functions, based on which we develop generalization bounds in expectation. The early-stopping strategy is adopted to quantify the balance between estimation and optimization. Our analysis further incorporates the low-noise setting into the excess risk bounds to achieve the optimistic bound as O(1/n), where n is the sample size. Liang Wu 0015, Ruixi Hu, Yunwen Lei |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Source-free domain adaptation with unrestricted source hypothesis
Jiujun He, Liang Wu 0015, Chaofan Tao, Fengmao Lv |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2021 | Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-Valued LearningabstractMany fundamental machine learning tasks can be formulated as a problem of learning with vector-valued functions, where we learn multiple scalar-valued functions together. Although there is some generalization analysis on different specific algorithms under the empirical risk minimization principle, a unifying analysis of vector-valued learning under a regularization framework is still lacking. In this paper, we initiate the generalization analysis of regularized vector-valued learning algorithms by presenting bounds with a mild dependency on the output dimension and a fast rate on the sample size. Our discussions relax the existing assumptions on the restrictive constraint of hypothesis spaces, smoothness of loss functions and low-noise condition. To understand the interaction between optimization and learning, we further use our results to derive the first generalization bounds for stochastic gradient descent with vector-valued functions. We apply our general results to multi-class classification and multi-label classification, which yield the first bounds with a logarithmic dependency on the output dimension for extreme multi-label classification with the Frobenius regularization. As a byproduct, we derive a Rademacher complexity bound for loss function classes defined in terms of a general strongly convex function. Liang Wu 0015, Antoine Ledent, Yunwen Lei, Marius Kloft |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Stability and Generalization for Randomized Coordinate DescentabstractRandomized coordinate descent (RCD) is a popular optimization algorithm with wide applications in various machine learning problems, which motivates a lot of theoretical analysis on its convergence behavior. As a comparison, there is no work studying how the models trained by RCD would generalize to test examples. In this paper, we initialize the generalization analysis of RCD by leveraging the powerful tool of algorithmic stability. We establish argument stability bounds of RCD for both convex and strongly convex objectives, from which we develop optimal generalization bounds by showing how to early-stop the algorithm to tradeoff the estimation and optimization. Our analysis shows that RCD enjoys better stability as compared to stochastic gradient descent. Puyu Wang, Liang Wu 0015, Yunwen Lei |
IJCAI | 2 |