Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory Wolfe
dblp:20/671
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers |
Electronic design automation · 84% Parallel and multicore computing · 16% | |
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
intellectual property protection |
0.1 | 4 | 2001 | Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 Watermarking Graph Partitioning Solutions · DAC 2001 Robust IP Watermarking Methodologies for Physical Design · DAC 1998 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.1 | 3 | 2002 | Watermarking graph partitioning solutions · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2002 Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 Watermarking Graph Partitioning Solutions · DAC 2001 |
Electronic design automation › intellectual property protection
watermarking |
0.1 | 3 | 2001 | Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 Watermarking Graph Partitioning Solutions · DAC 2001 Watermarking Techniques for Intellectual Property Protection · DAC 1998 |
Parallel and multicore computing
graph partitioning |
0.1 | 2 | 2002 | Watermarking graph partitioning solutions · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2002 Watermarking Graph Partitioning Solutions · DAC 2001 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.1 | 4 | 2002 | Watermarking graph partitioning solutions · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2002 Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 Robust IP Watermarking Methodologies for Physical Design · DAC 1998 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
IP protection watermarking |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Watermarking graph partitioning solutions · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2002 |
Electronic design automation
design methodology |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement and routing |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protection · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constraint-based watermarking · 0.1graph partitioning · 0.1constraint satisfaction · 0.1watermark embedding protocols · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Watermarking graph partitioning solutionsabstractThe authors introduce an Intellectual Property Protection (IPP) technique for graph partitioning which watermarks solutions to the graph partitioning problems so that they carry an author's signature. This technique is completely transparent to the actual computer-aided design tool which does the partitioning and is implemented by preprocessing and postprocessing alone. The authors propose five different schemes for the watermarking of partitioning solutions. The goal is to construct a partitioning solution which not only has a small edge cut, but also encodes the signature of the author. The key idea of all of our schemes is to map the signature into a set of constraints and then satisfy a disproportionate number of these constraints. Four of our schemes are based upon the idea of encouraging groups of vertices to be in the same partition. The fifth is based upon the encouragement of certain edges to be cut by the partitioning. The fifth scheme shows superior performances on all of the cases which we tested, including both two-way and multiway partitioning. The watermarking scheme produces solutions that have very low-quality degradation levels, yet carry signatures that are convincingly unambiguous, extremely unlikely to be present by coincidence and difficult to detect or remove without completely resolving the partitioning problem. Gregory Wolfe, Jennifer Wong-Ma, Miodrag Potkonjak |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2001 | Watermarking Graph Partitioning SolutionsabstractTrends in the semiconductor industry towards extensive design and code reuse motivate a need for adequate Intellectual Property Protection (IPP) schemes. We offer a new general IPP scheme called constraint-based watermarking and analyize it in the context of the graph partitioning problem. Graph partitioning is a critical optimization problem that has many applications, particularly in the semiconductor design process. Our IPP technique for graph partitioning watermarks solutions to graph partitioning problems so that they carry an author's signature. Our technique is transparent to the actual CAD tool which does the partitioning. Our technique produces solutions that have very low quality degradation levels, yet carry signatures that are convincingly unambiguous, extremely unlikely to be present by coincidence, and difficult to detect or remove without completely resolving the partitioning problem. Gregory Wolfe, Jennifer Wong-Ma, Miodrag Potkonjak |
DAC | 1 |
| 2001 | Constraint-based watermarking techniques for design IP protectionabstractDigital system designs are the product of valuable effort and know-how. Their embodiments, from software and hardware description language program down to device-level netlist and mask data, represent carefully guarded intellectual property (IP). Hence, design methodologies based on IP reuse require new mechanisms to protect the rights of IP producers and owners. This paper establishes principles of watermarking-based IP protection, where a watermark is a mechanism for identification that is: (1) nearly invisible to human and machine inspection; (2) difficult to remove; and (3) permanently embedded as an integral part of the design. Watermarking addresses IP protection by tracing unauthorized reuse and making untraceable unauthorized reuse as difficult as recreating given pieces of IP from scratch. We survey related work in cryptography and design methodology, then develop desiderata, metrics, and concrete protocols for constraint-based watermarking at various stages of the very large scale integration (VLSI) design process. In particular, we propose a new preprocessing approach that embeds watermarks as constraints into the input of a black-box design tool and a new postprocessing approach that embeds watermarks as constraints into the output of a black-box design tool. To demonstrate that our protocols can be transparently integrated into existing design flows, we use a testbed of commercial tools for VLSI physical design and embed watermarks into real-world industrial designs. We show that the implementation overhead is low-both in terms of central processing unit time and such standard physical design metrics as wirelength, layout area, number of vias, and routing congestion. We empirically show that the placement and routing applications considered in our methods achieve strong proofs of authorship and are resistant to tampering and do not adversely influence timing. Andrew B. Kahng, John C. Lach, William H. Mangione-Smith, Stefanus Mantik, Igor L. Markov, Miodrag Potkonjak, Paul Tucker, Gregory Wolfe |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 9 |
| 1998 | Watermarking Techniques for Intellectual Property ProtectionabstractDigital system designs are the product of valuable effort and knowhow. Their embodiments, from software and HDL program down to device-level netlist and mask data, represent carefully guarded intellectual property (IP). Hence, design methodologies based on IP reuse require new mechanisms to protect the rights of IP producers and owners. This paper establishes principles of watermarkingbased IP protection, where a watermark is a mechanism for identification that is (i) nearly invisible to human and machine inspection, (ii) difficult to remove, and (iii) permanently embedded as an integral part of the design. We survey related work in cryptography and design methodology, then develop desiderata, metrics and example approaches -- centering on constraint-based techniques -- for watermarking at various stages of the VLSI design process. 1 Introduction The advance of processing technology has led to a rapid increase in IC design complexity. The economic drivers are compelling: only by put... Andrew B. Kahng, John C. Lach, William H. Mangione-Smith, Stefanus Mantik, Igor L. Markov, Miodrag Potkonjak, Paul Tucker, Gregory Wolfe |
DAC | 9 |
| 1998 | Robust IP Watermarking Methodologies for Physical DesignabstractIncreasingly popular reuse-based design paradigms create a pressing need for authorship enforcement techniques that protect the intellectual property rights of designers. We develop the first intellectual property protection protocols for embedding design watermarks at the physical design level. We demonstrate that these protocols are tarnsparent with respect to existing industrial tools and design flows, and that they can embed watermarks into real-world industrial designs with very low implementation overhead (as measured by such standard metrics as wirelength, layout area, number of vias, routing congestion and CPU time). On several industrial test cases, we obtain extremely strong, tamper-resistant proofs of authorship for placement and routing solutions. Andrew B. Kahng, Stefanus Mantik, Igor L. Markov, Miodrag Potkonjak, Paul Tucker, Gregory Wolfe |
DAC | 7 |