Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Caleb Woodruff
dblp:20/9188
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › cognitive science
human decision-making |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Deterministic Modeling and Evaluation of Decision-Making Dynamics in Sequential Two-Alternative Forced Choice Tasks · Proc. IEEE 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability analysis · 0.3deterministic modeling · 0.3finite-state machine · 0.1finite state machine · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Deterministic Modeling and Evaluation of Decision-Making Dynamics in Sequential Two-Alternative Forced Choice TasksabstractThe focus of the work in this paper is a systems-theoretic construction, analysis, and evaluation of a deterministic model of human decision making relative to experimental data. In sequential two-alternative forced choice decision tasks, a human subject is presented with two choices at every time step, is given finite time to select one of the choices, and receives a reward after a choice is made (presented as a number on a computer screen). The goal for the human is to obtain the maximal reward while not knowing the underlying reward assignment process. In this work, we present a parameterized deterministic model for human decision making in this context and analyze optimality and stability using a finite state machine approach. This model is then evaluated relative to experimental data from human subjects performing each of six tasks. Caleb Woodruff, Linh Vu, Kristi A. Morgansen, Damon Tomlin |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |