Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Caleb Woodruff

dblp:20/9188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › cognitive science
human decision-making
0.112012
Deterministic Modeling and Evaluation of Decision-Making Dynamics in Sequential Two-Alternative Forced Choice Tasks · Proc. IEEE 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stability analysis · 0.3deterministic modeling · 0.3finite-state machine · 0.1finite state machine · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Deterministic Modeling and Evaluation of Decision-Making Dynamics in Sequential Two-Alternative Forced Choice Tasks
abstract
The focus of the work in this paper is a systems-theoretic construction, analysis, and evaluation of a deterministic model of human decision making relative to experimental data. In sequential two-alternative forced choice decision tasks, a human subject is presented with two choices at every time step, is given finite time to select one of the choices, and receives a reward after a choice is made (presented as a number on a computer screen). The goal for the human is to obtain the maximal reward while not knowing the underlying reward assignment process. In this work, we present a parameterized deterministic model for human decision making in this context and analyze optimality and stability using a finite state machine approach. This model is then evaluated relative to experimental data from human subjects performing each of six tasks.
Caleb Woodruff, Linh Vu, Kristi A. Morgansen, Damon Tomlin
Proc. IEEE1