Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kaili Ma 0001
dblp:200/0854-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9484-8915ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Graph learning · 41% Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability · ICLR 2022 Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2021 Measuring and Improving the Use of Graph Information in Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICLR 2023 Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICLR 2023 Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
pareto optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › invariance
causal invariance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › graph adversarial attack
graph injection attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph structure learning
invariant subgraph learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape correspondence
non-isometric shape matching |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exact Shape Correspondence via 2D graph convolution · NeurIPS 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape correspondence |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exact Shape Correspondence via 2D graph convolution · NeurIPS 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
graph adversarial attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph regularization
graph laplacian regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Measuring and Improving the Use of Graph Information in Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
invariant risk minimization · 0.7laplace-beltrami eigenfunctions · 0.6information-theoretic objective · 0.6causal models · 0.62d graph convolution · 0.6propagation regularization · 0.5graph laplacian regularization · 0.5graph neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Solving the non-submodular network collapse problems via Decision Transformer
Kaili Ma 0001, Han Yang 0002, Shanchao Yang, Kangfei Zhao, Lanqing Li, Yongqiang Chen 0002, Junzhou Huang, James Cheng, Yu Rong 0001 |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2023 | Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Yongqiang Chen 0002, Kaiwen Zhou 0001, Yatao Bian, Binghui Xie, Bingzhe Wu, Yonggang Zhang 0003, Kaili Ma 0001, Han Yang 0002, Peilin Zhao, Bo Han 0003, James Cheng |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2023 | GRACE: A General Graph Convolution Framework for Attributed Graph ClusteringabstractAttributed graph clustering (AGC) is an important problem in graph mining as more and more complex data in real-world have been represented in graphs with attributed nodes. While it is a common practice to leverage both attribute and structure information for improved clustering performance, most existing AGC algorithms consider only a specific type of relations, which hinders their applicability to integrate various complex relations into node attributes for AGC. In this article, we propose GRACE, an extended graph convolution framework for AGC tasks. Our framework provides a general and interpretative solution for clustering many different types of attributed graphs, including undirected, directed, heterogeneous and hyper attributed graphs. By building suitable graph Laplacians for each of the aforementioned graph types, GRACE can seamlessly perform graph convolution on node attributes to fuse all available information for clustering. We conduct extensive experiments on 14 real-world datasets of four different graph types. The experimental results show that GRACE outperforms the state-of-the-art AGC methods on the different graph types in terms of clustering quality, time, and memory usage. Barakeel Fanseu Kamhoua, Lin Zhang 0059, Kaili Ma 0001, James Cheng, Bo Li 0001, Bo Han 0003 |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 3 |
| 2022 | Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeability
Yongqiang Chen 0002, Han Yang 0002, Yonggang Zhang 0003, Kaili Ma 0001, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han 0003, James Cheng |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on GraphsabstractDespite recent success in using the invariance principle for out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization on Euclidean data (e.g., images), studies on graph data are still limited. Different from images, the complex nature of graphs poses unique challenges to adopting the invariance principle. In particular, distribution shifts on graphs can appear in a variety of forms such as attributes and structures, making it difficult to identify the invariance. Moreover, domain or environment partitions, which are often required by OOD methods on Euclidean data, could be highly expensive to obtain for graphs. To bridge this gap, we propose a new framework, called Causality Inspired Invariant Graph LeArning (CIGA), to capture the invariance of graphs for guaranteed OOD generalization under various distribution shifts. Specifically, we characterize potential distribution shifts on graphs with causal models, concluding that OOD generalization on graphs is achievable when models focus only on subgraphs containing the most information about the causes of labels. Accordingly, we propose an information-theoretic objective to extract the desired subgraphs that maximally preserve the invariant intra-class information. Learning with these subgraphs is immune to distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on 16 synthetic or real-world datasets, including a challenging setting -- DrugOOD, from AI-aided drug discovery, validate the superior OOD performance of CIGA. Yongqiang Chen 0002, Yonggang Zhang 0003, Yatao Bian, Han Yang 0002, Kaili Ma 0001, Binghui Xie, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han 0003, James Cheng |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | Exact Shape Correspondence via 2D graph convolutionabstractFor exact 3D shape correspondence (matching or alignment), i.e., the task of matching each point on a shape to its exact corresponding point on the other shape (or to be more specific, matching at geodesic error 0), most existing methods do not perform well due to two main problems. First, on nearly-isometric shapes (i.e., low noise levels), most existing methods use the eigen-vectors (eigen-functions) of the Laplace Beltrami Operator (LBO) or other shape descriptors to update an initialized correspondence which is not exact, leading to an accumulation of update errors. Thus, though the final correspondence may generally be smooth, it is generally inexact. Second, on non-isometric shapes (noisy shapes), existing methods are generally not robust to noise as they usually assume near-isometry. In addition, existing methods that attempt to address the non-isometric shape problem (e.g., GRAMPA) are generally computationally expensive and do not generalise to nearly-isometric shapes. To address these two problems, we propose a 2D graph convolution-based framework called 2D-GEM. 2D-GEM is robust to noise on non-isometric shapes and with a few additional constraints, it also addresses the errors in the update on nearly-isometric shapes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of 2D-GEM by achieving a high accuracy of 90.5$\%$ at geodesic error 0 on the non-isometric benchmark SHREC16, i.e., TOPKIDS (while being much faster than GRAMPA), and on nearly-isometric benchmarks by achieving a high accuracy of 92.5$\%$ on TOSCA and 84.9$\%$ on SCAPE at geodesic error 0. Barakeel Fanseu Kamhoua, Lin Zhang 0059, Yongqiang Chen 0002, Han Yang 0002, Kaili Ma 0001, Bo Han 0003, Bo Li 0001, James Cheng |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2021 | Rethinking Graph Regularization for Graph Neural NetworksabstractThe graph Laplacian regularization term is usually used in semi-supervised representation learning to provide graph structure information for a model f(X). However, with the recent popularity of graph neural networks (GNNs), directly encoding graph structure A into a model, i.e., f(A, X), has become the more common approach. While we show that graph Laplacian regularization brings little-to-no benefit to existing GNNs, and propose a simple but non-trivial variant of graph Laplacian regularization, called Propagation-regularization (P-reg), to boost the performance of existing GNN models. We provide formal analyses to show that P-reg not only infuses extra information (that is not captured by the traditional graph Laplacian regularization) into GNNs, but also has the capacity equivalent to an infinite-depth graph convolutional network. We demonstrate that P-reg can effectively boost the performance of existing GNN models on both node-level and graph-level tasks across many different datasets. Han Yang 0002, Kaili Ma 0001, James Cheng |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2021 | HyperGraph Convolution Based Attributed HyperGraph ClusteringabstractAttributed Graph Clustering (AGC) and Attributed Hypergraph Clustering (AHC) are important topics in graph mining with many applications. For AGC, amongst the unsupervised methods that combine the graph structure with node attributes, graph convolution has been shown to achieve impressive results. However, the effects of graph convolution on AGC have not yet been adequately studied. In this paper, we show that graph convolution attempts to find the best trade-off between node attribute distance and the number of inter-cluster edges. On the one hand, we show that compared to clustering node attributes directly, graph convolution produces a greater distance between node attributes in the same cluster and a smaller distance between node attributes in different clusters (which is detrimental for clustering). On the other hand, we show that graph convolution benefits clustering by considerably reducing the number of edges among different clusters. We then extend our result on AGC to AHC and leverage the hypergraph convolution to propose an unsupervised, fast, and memory-efficient algorithm (GRAC) for AHC, which achieves excellent performance on popular supervised clustering measures. Barakeel Fanseu Kamhoua, Lin Zhang 0059, Kaili Ma 0001, James Cheng, Bo Li 0001, Bo Han 0003 |
CIKM | 3 |
| 2020 | Measuring and Improving the Use of Graph Information in Graph Neural Networks
Jie Zhang 0046, James Cheng, Kaili Ma 0001, Richard T. B. Ma, Ming-Chang Yang |
ICLR | 4 |