Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tyler Santander
dblp:200/1177
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-9459-5783ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers |
Empirical software engineering · 82% Software maintenance and evolution · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
1.1 | 3 | 2020 | Biases and differences in code review using medical imaging and eye-tracking: genders, humans, and machines · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 Distilling neural representations of data structure manipulation using fMRI and fNIRS · ICSE 2019 Decoding the representation of code in the brain: an fMRI study of code review and expertise · ICSE 2017 |
Empirical software engineering › human factors in software engineering
developer cognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neurological divide: an fMRI study of prose and code writing · ICSE 2020 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code review |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Biases and differences in code review using medical imaging and eye-tracking: genders, humans, and machines · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neurological divide: an fMRI study of prose and code writing · ICSE 2020 |
Computing education › programming education
cognitive processes in programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Distilling neural representations of data structure manipulation using fMRI and fNIRS · ICSE 2019 |
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
code comprehension |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Decoding the representation of code in the brain: an fMRI study of code review and expertise · ICSE 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fMRI · 1.0neuroimaging · 0.8fNIRS · 0.8functional magnetic resonance imaging · 0.7medical imaging · 0.4eye tracking · 0.4controlled experiment · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | StressNet: Detecting Stress in Thermal VideosabstractPrecise measurement of physiological signals is critical for the effective monitoring of human vital signs. Recent developments in computer vision have demonstrated that signals such as pulse rate and respiration rate can be extracted from digital video of humans, increasing the possibility of contact-less monitoring. This paper presents a novel approach to obtaining physiological signals and classifying stress states from thermal video. The proposed network–"StressNet"–features a hybrid emission representation model that models the direct emission and absorption of heat by the skin and underlying blood vessels. This results in an information-rich feature representation of the face, which is used by spatio-temporal network for reconstructing the ISTI ( Initial Systolic Time Interval : a measure of change in cardiac sympathetic activity that is considered to be a quantitative index of stress in humans). The reconstructed ISTI signal is fed into a stress-detection model to detect and classify the individual’s stress state (i.e. stress or no stress). A detailed evaluation demonstrates that Stress-Net achieves estimated the ISTI signal with 95% accuracy and detect stress with average precision of 0.842. A S. M. Iftekhar, Michael Goebel, Tom Bullock, Mary H. MacLean, Michael B. Miller, Tyler Santander, Barry Giesbrecht, Scott T. Grafton, B. S. Manjunath |
WACV | 7 |
| 2020 | Neurological divide: an fMRI study of prose and code writingabstractSoftware engineering involves writing new code or editing existing code. Recent efforts have investigated the neural processes associated with reading and comprehending code --- however, we lack a thorough understanding of the human cognitive processes underlying code writing. While prose reading and writing have been studied thoroughly, that same scrutiny has not been applied to code writing. In this paper, we leverage functional brain imaging to investigate neural representations of code writing in comparison to prose writing. We present the first human study in which participants wrote code and prose while undergoing a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain scan, making use of a full-sized fMRI-safe QWERTY keyboard. Ryan Krueger, Yu Huang 0015, Tyler Santander, Westley Weimer, Kevin Leach |
ICSE | 4 |
| 2020 | Biases and differences in code review using medical imaging and eye-tracking: genders, humans, and machinesabstractCode review is a critical step in modern software quality assurance, yet it is vulnerable to human biases. Previous studies have clarified the extent of the problem, particularly regarding biases against the authors of code,but no consensus understanding has emerged. Advances in medical imaging are increasingly applied to software engineering, supporting grounded neurobiological explorations of computing activities, including the review, reading, and writing of source code. In this paper, we present the results of a controlled experiment using both medical imaging and also eye tracking to investigate the neurological correlates of biases and differences between genders of humans and machines (e.g., automated program repair tools) in code review. We find that men and women conduct code reviews differently, in ways that are measurable and supported by behavioral, eye-tracking and medical imaging data. We also find biases in how humans review code as a function of its apparent author, when controlling for code quality. In addition to advancing our fundamental understanding of how cognitive biases relate to the code review process, the results may inform subsequent training and tool design to reduce bias. Yu Huang 0015, Kevin Leach, Zohreh Sharafi, Nicholas McKay, Tyler Santander, Westley Weimer |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 5 |
| 2019 | Distilling neural representations of data structure manipulation using fMRI and fNIRSabstractData structures permeate many aspects of software engineering, but their associated human cognitive processes are not thoroughly understood. We leverage medical imaging and insights from the psychological notion of spatial ability to decode the neural representations of several fundamental data structures and their manipulations. In a human study involving 76 participants, we examine list, array, tree, and mental rotation tasks using both functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We find a nuanced relationship: data structure and spatial operations use the same focal regions of the brain but to different degrees. They are related but distinct neural tasks. In addition, more difficult computer science problems induce higher cognitive load than do problems of pure spatial reasoning. Finally, while fNIRS is less expensive and more permissive, there are some computing-relevant brain regions that only fMRI can reach. Yu Huang 0015, Ryan Krueger, Tyler Santander, Xiao-Su Hu, Kevin Leach, Westley Weimer |
ICSE | 4 |
| 2017 | Decoding the representation of code in the brain: an fMRI study of code review and expertiseabstractSubjective judgments in software engineering tasks are of critical importance but can be difficult to study with conventional means. Medical imaging techniques hold the promise of relating cognition to physical activities and brain structures. In a controlled experiment involving 29 participants, we examine code comprehension, code review and prose review using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We find that the neural representations of programming languages vs. natural languages are distinct. We can classify which task a participant is undertaking based solely on brain activity (balanced accuracy 79%, p <; 0.001). Further, we find that the same set of brain regions distinguish between code and prose (near-perfect correlation, r = 0.99, p <; 0.001). Finally, we find that task distinctions are modulated by expertise, such that greater skill predicts a less differentiated neural representation (r = -0.44, p = 0.016) indicating that more skilled participants treat code and prose more similarly at a neural activation level. Benjamin Floyd, Tyler Santander, Westley Weimer |
ICSE | 2 |