Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nhat X. T. Le

dblp:200/2396 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9406-8716ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text summarization › user-generated content summarization
review summarization
0.312017
Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.312017
Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112017
Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

opinion coverage framework · 0.6bounded approximation algorithms · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Query by documents on top of a search interface
Nhat X. T. Le, Moloud Shahbazi, Abdulaziz Almaslukh, Vagelis Hristidis
Inf. Syst.1
2019 Unsupervised Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization
Nhat X. T. Le, Neal E. Young, Vagelis Hristidis
WISE1
2017 Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization
abstract
In this Web 2.0 era, there is an ever increasing number of product or service reviews, which must be summarized to help consumers effortlessly make informed decisions. Previous work on reviews summarization has simplified the problem by assuming that features (e.g., "display") are independent of each other and that the opinion for each feature in a review is Boolean: positive or negative. However, in reality features may be interrelated – e.g., "display" and "display color" – and the sentiment takes values in a continuous range – e.g., somewhat vs very positive. We present a novel review summarization framework that advances the state-of-the-art by leveraging a domain hierarchy of concepts to handle the semantic overlap among the features, and by accounting for different sentiment levels. We show that the problem is NP-hard and present bounded approximate algorithms to compute the most representative set of sentences, based on a principled opinion coverage framework. We experimentally evaluate the quality of the summaries using both intuitive coverage measure and a user study.
Nhat X. T. Le, Vagelis Hristidis, Neal E. Young
ICDE1