Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nhat X. T. Le
dblp:200/2396
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9406-8716ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › text summarization › user-generated content summarization
review summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization · ICDE 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
opinion coverage framework · 0.6bounded approximation algorithms · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Query by documents on top of a search interface
Nhat X. T. Le, Moloud Shahbazi, Abdulaziz Almaslukh, Vagelis Hristidis |
Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2019 | Unsupervised Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review Summarization
Nhat X. T. Le, Neal E. Young, Vagelis Hristidis |
WISE | 1 |
| 2017 | Ontology- and Sentiment-Aware Review SummarizationabstractIn this Web 2.0 era, there is an ever increasing number of product or service reviews, which must be summarized to help consumers effortlessly make informed decisions. Previous work on reviews summarization has simplified the problem by assuming that features (e.g., "display") are independent of each other and that the opinion for each feature in a review is Boolean: positive or negative. However, in reality features may be interrelated – e.g., "display" and "display color" – and the sentiment takes values in a continuous range – e.g., somewhat vs very positive. We present a novel review summarization framework that advances the state-of-the-art by leveraging a domain hierarchy of concepts to handle the semantic overlap among the features, and by accounting for different sentiment levels. We show that the problem is NP-hard and present bounded approximate algorithms to compute the most representative set of sentences, based on a principled opinion coverage framework. We experimentally evaluate the quality of the summaries using both intuitive coverage measure and a user study. Nhat X. T. Le, Vagelis Hristidis, Neal E. Young |
ICDE | 1 |