Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noah Kravitz

dblp:200/8646 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 91% Algorithms and data structures · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
coding bounds
0.812024
Logarithmically Larger Deletion Codes of All Distances · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › insertion and deletion › insertion-deletion channel
deletion-correcting codes
0.812024
Logarithmically Larger Deletion Codes of All Distances · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding bounds › minimum distance bounds
gilbert-varshamov bound
0.812024
Logarithmically Larger Deletion Codes of All Distances · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
longest common subsequence
0.212024
Logarithmically Larger Deletion Codes of All Distances · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic construction · 0.8asymptotic analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Logarithmically Larger Deletion Codes of All Distances
abstract
The deletion distance between two binary words$u,v \in \{0,1\}^{n}$is the smallest$k$such that$u$and$v$share a common subsequence of length$n-k$. A set$C$of binary words of length$n$is called a$k$-deletion code if every pair of distinct words in$C$has deletion distance greater than$k$. In 1965, Levenshtein initiated the study of deletion codes by showing that, for$k\ge 1$fixed and$n$going to infinity, a$k$-deletion code$C\subseteq \{0,1\}^{n}$of maximum size satisfies$\Omega _{k}(2^{n}/n^{2k}) \leq |C| \leq O_{k}(2^{n}/n^{k})$. We make the first asymptotic improvement to these bounds by showing that there exist$k$-deletion codes with size at least$\Omega _{k}(2^{n} \log n/n^{2k})$. Our proof is inspired by Jiang and Vardy’s improvement to the classical Gilbert–Varshamov bounds. We also establish several related results on the number of longest common subsequences and shortest common supersequences of a pair of words with given length and deletion distance.
Noga Alon, Gabriela Bourla, Ben Graham, Noah Kravitz
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory5