Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Olivier Humbert

dblp:200/8743 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4440-5416ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning paradigms · 40% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing
0.712023
Don't fear the unlabelled: safe semi-supervised learning via debiasing · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
label bias
0.712023
Are labels informative in semi-supervised learning? Estimating and leveraging the missing-data mechanism · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing not at random
0.712023
Are labels informative in semi-supervised learning? Estimating and leveraging the missing-data mechanism · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
safe semi-supervised learning
0.712023
Don't fear the unlabelled: safe semi-supervised learning via debiasing · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.712023
Are labels informative in semi-supervised learning? Estimating and leveraging the missing-data mechanism · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.7likelihood ratio test · 0.7inverse propensity weighting · 0.7debiasing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Privacy preserving image registration
abstract
Image registration is a key task in medical imaging applications, allowing to represent medical images in a common spatial reference frame. Current approaches to image registration are generally based on the assumption that the content of the images is usually accessible in clear form, from which the spatial transformation is subsequently estimated. This common assumption may not be met in practical applications, since the sensitive nature of medical images may ultimately require their analysis under privacy constraints, preventing to openly share the image content . In this work, we formulate the problem of image registration under a privacy preserving regime, where images are assumed to be confidential and cannot be disclosed in clear. We derive our privacy preserving image registration framework by extending classical registration paradigms to account for advanced cryptographic tools, such as secure multi-party computation and homomorphic encryption, that enable the execution of operations without leaking the underlying data. To overcome the problem of performance and scalability of cryptographic tools in high dimensions, we propose several techniques to optimize the image registration operations by using gradient approximations, and by revisiting the use of homomorphic encryption trough packing, to allow the efficient encryption and multiplication of large matrices. We focus on registration methods of increasing complexity, including rigid, affine, and non-linear registration based on cubic splines or diffeomorphisms parameterized by time-varying velocity fields . In all these settings, we demonstrate how the registration problem can be naturally adapted for accounting to privacy-preserving operations, and illustrate the effectiveness of PPIR on a variety of registration tasks. • Image registration under a privacy preserving regime. • This work extends classic registration paradigms and integrates cryptographic tools. • Privacy preserving linear & non-linear registration with sum squared differences. • Privacy preserving linear registration with mutual information. • Privacy preserving non-linear registration with cross correlration. • Privacy preserving rigid point cloud registration. • Methods to optimize image registration operations with cryptographic tools. • Results demonstrate the proposed work’s applicability in 2D-3D medical imaging tasks.
Riccardo Taiello, Melek Önen, Francesco Capano, Olivier Humbert, Marco Lorenzi
Medical Image Anal.4
2023 Don't fear the unlabelled: safe semi-supervised learning via debiasing
Hugo Schmutz, Olivier Humbert, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei
ICLR2
2023 Are labels informative in semi-supervised learning? Estimating and leveraging the missing-data mechanism
abstract
Semi-supervised learning is a powerful technique for leveraging unlabeled data to improve machine learning models, but it can be affected by the presence of “informative" labels, which occur when some classes are more likely to be labeled than others. In the missing data literature, such labels are called missing not at random. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to address this issue by estimating the missing-data mechanism and using inverse propensity weighting to debias any SSL algorithm, including those using data augmentation. We also propose a likelihood ratio test to assess whether or not labels are indeed informative. Finally, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods on different datasets, in particular on two medical datasets for which we design pseudo-realistic missing data scenarios.
Aude Sportisse, Hugo Schmutz, Olivier Humbert, Charles Bouveyron, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei
ICML3
2022 Privacy Preserving Image Registration
Riccardo Taiello, Melek Önen, Olivier Humbert, Marco Lorenzi
MICCAI (6)3
2022 Learning a confidence score and the latent space of a new supervised autoencoder for diagnosis and prognosis in clinical metabolomic studies
abstract
BACKGROUND: Presently, there is a wide variety of classification methods and deep neural network approaches in bioinformatics. Deep neural networks have proven their effectiveness for classification tasks, and have outperformed classical methods, but they suffer from a lack of interpretability. Therefore, these innovative methods are not appropriate for decision support systems in healthcare. Indeed, to allow clinicians to make informed and well thought out decisions, the algorithm should provide the main pieces of information used to compute the predicted diagnosis and/or prognosis, as well as a confidence score for this prediction. METHODS: Herein, we used a new supervised autoencoder (SAE) approach for classification of clinical metabolomic data. This new method has the advantage of providing a confidence score for each prediction thanks to a softmax classifier and a meaningful latent space visualization and to include a new efficient feature selection method, with a structured constraint, which allows for biologically interpretable results. RESULTS: Experimental results on three metabolomics datasets of clinical samples illustrate the effectiveness of our SAE and its confidence score. The supervised autoencoder provides an accurate localization of the patients in the latent space, and an efficient confidence score. Experiments show that the SAE outperforms classical methods (PLS-DA, Random Forests, SVM, and neural networks (NN)). Furthermore, the metabolites selected by the SAE were found to be biologically relevant. CONCLUSION: In this paper, we describe a new efficient SAE method to support diagnostic or prognostic evaluation based on metabolomics analyses.
David Chardin, Cyprien Gille, Thierry Pourcher, Olivier Humbert, Michel Barlaud
BMC Bioinform.4
2021 Primal-dual for classification with rejection (PD-CR): a novel method for classification and feature selection - an application in metabolomics studies
abstract
BACKGROUND: Supervised classification methods have been used for many years for feature selection in metabolomics and other omics studies. We developed a novel primal-dual based classification method (PD-CR) that can perform classification with rejection and feature selection on high dimensional datasets. PD-CR projects data onto a low dimension space and performs classification by minimizing an appropriate quadratic cost. It simultaneously optimizes the selected features and the prediction accuracy with a new tailored, constrained primal-dual method. The primal-dual framework is general enough to encompass various robust losses and to allow for convergence analysis. Here, we compare PD-CR to three commonly used methods: partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), random forests and support vector machines (SVM). We analyzed two metabolomics datasets: one urinary metabolomics dataset concerning lung cancer patients and healthy controls; and a metabolomics dataset obtained from frozen glial tumor samples with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) or wild-type IDH. RESULTS: PD-CR was more accurate than PLS-DA, Random Forests and SVM for classification using the 2 metabolomics datasets. It also selected biologically relevant metabolites. PD-CR has the advantage of providing a confidence score for each prediction, which can be used to perform classification with rejection. This substantially reduces the False Discovery Rate. CONCLUSION: PD-CR is an accurate method for classification of metabolomics datasets which can outperform PLS-DA, Random Forests and SVM while selecting biologically relevant features. Furthermore the confidence score provided with PD-CR can be used to perform classification with rejection and reduce the false discovery rate.
David Chardin, Olivier Humbert, Caroline Bailleux, Fanny Burel-Vandenbos, Valerie Rigau, Thierry Pourcher, Michel Barlaud
BMC Bioinform.2
2018 Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved?
abstract
Delineation of the left ventricular cavity, myocardium, and right ventricle from cardiac magnetic resonance images (multi-slice 2-D cine MRI) is a common clinical task to establish diagnosis. The automation of the corresponding tasks has thus been the subject of intense research over the past decades. In this paper, we introduce the "Automatic Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge" dataset (ACDC), the largest publicly available and fully annotated dataset for the purpose of cardiac MRI (CMR) assessment. The dataset contains data from 150 multi-equipments CMRI recordings with reference measurements and classification from two medical experts. The overarching objective of this paper is to measure how far state-of-the-art deep learning methods can go at assessing CMRI, i.e., segmenting the myocardium and the two ventricles as well as classifying pathologies. In the wake of the 2017 MICCAI-ACDC challenge, we report results from deep learning methods provided by nine research groups for the segmentation task and four groups for the classification task. Results show that the best methods faithfully reproduce the expert analysis, leading to a mean value of 0.97 correlation score for the automatic extraction of clinical indices and an accuracy of 0.96 for automatic diagnosis. These results clearly open the door to highly accurate and fully automatic analysis of cardiac CMRI. We also identify scenarios for which deep learning methods are still failing. Both the dataset and detailed results are publicly available online, while the platform will remain open for new submissions.
Olivier Bernard 0001, Alain Lalande, Clément Zotti, Frederic Cervenansky, Xin Yang 0009, Pheng-Ann Heng, Irem Cetin, Karim Lekadir, Oscar Camara 0001, Miguel Ángel González Ballester, Gerard Sanroma, Sandy Napel, Steffen E. Petersen, Georgios Tziritas, Ilias Grinias, Mahendra Khened, Alex Varghese, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Marc-Michel Rohé, Xavier Pennec, Maxime Sermesant, Fabian Isensee, Paul F. Jaeger, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Peter M. Full, Ivo Wolf, Sandy Engelhardt, Christian F. Baumgartner, Lisa M. Koch, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Ivana Isgum, Yeonggul Jang, Yoonmi Hong, Jay Patravali, Shubham Jain 0006, Olivier Humbert, Pierre-Marc Jodoin
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging36