Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Klar
dblp:201/1282
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Anomaly Detection With Multiple-Hypotheses Predictions · ICML 2019 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Anomaly Detection With Multiple-Hypotheses Predictions · ICML 2019 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
one-class classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Anomaly Detection With Multiple-Hypotheses Predictions · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
autoencoder · 0.8adversarial discriminator · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Anomaly Detection With Multiple-Hypotheses PredictionsabstractIn one-class-learning tasks, only the normal case (foreground) can be modeled with data, whereas the variation of all possible anomalies is too erratic to be described by samples. Thus, due to the lack of representative data, the wide-spread discriminative approaches cannot cover such learning tasks, and rather generative models,which attempt to learn the input density of the foreground, are used. However, generative models suffer from a large input dimensionality (as in images) and are typically inefficient learners.We propose to learn the data distribution of the foreground more efficiently with a multi-hypotheses autoencoder. Moreover, the model is criticized by a discriminator, which prevents artificial data modes not supported by data, and which enforces diversity across hypotheses. Our multiple-hypotheses-based anomaly detection framework allows the reliable identification of out-of-distribution samples. For anomaly detection on CIFAR-10, it yields up to 3.9% points improvement over previously reported results. On a real anomaly detection task, the approach reduces the error of the baseline models from 6.8% to 1.5%. Duc Tam Nguyen, Zhongyu Lou, Michael Klar, Thomas Brox |
ICML | 3 |