Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefanos Poulis
dblp:202/1248
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › machine teaching
teaching dimension |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning and data management
training data reduction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive teaching · 1.1approximation algorithm · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Teaching a black-box learnerabstractOne widely-studied model of teaching calls for a teacher to provide the minimal set of labeled examples that uniquely specifies a target concept. The assumption is that the teacher knows the learner’s hypothesis class, which is often not true of real-life teaching scenarios. We consider the problem of teaching a learner whose representation and hypothesis class are unknown—that is, the learner is a black box. We show that a teacher who does not interact with the learner can do no better than providing random examples. We then prove, however, that with interaction, a teacher can efficiently find a set of teaching examples that is a provably good approximation to the optimal set. As an illustration, we show how this scheme can be used to shrink training sets for any family of classifiers: that is, to find an approximately-minimal subset of training instances that yields the same classifier as the entire set. Sanjoy Dasgupta, Daniel Hsu 0001, Stefanos Poulis, Xiaojin Zhu 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2017 | Learning with Feature Feedback: from Theory to PracticeabstractIn supervised learning, a human annotator only needs to assign each data point (document, image, etc.) its correct label. But in many situations, the human can also provide richer feedback at essentially no extra cost. In this paper, we examine a particular type of feature feedback that has been used, with some success, in information retrieval and in computer vision. We formalize two models of feature feedback, give learning algorithms for them, and quantify their usefulness in the learning process. Our experiments also show the efficacy of these methods. Stefanos Poulis, Sanjoy Dasgupta |
AISTATS | 1 |