Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefanos Poulis

dblp:202/1248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › machine teaching
teaching dimension
0.412019
Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
active learning
0.412019
Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019
Machine learning and data management
training data reduction
0.112019
Teaching a black-box learner · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interactive teaching · 1.1approximation algorithm · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Teaching a black-box learner
abstract
One widely-studied model of teaching calls for a teacher to provide the minimal set of labeled examples that uniquely specifies a target concept. The assumption is that the teacher knows the learner’s hypothesis class, which is often not true of real-life teaching scenarios. We consider the problem of teaching a learner whose representation and hypothesis class are unknown—that is, the learner is a black box. We show that a teacher who does not interact with the learner can do no better than providing random examples. We then prove, however, that with interaction, a teacher can efficiently find a set of teaching examples that is a provably good approximation to the optimal set. As an illustration, we show how this scheme can be used to shrink training sets for any family of classifiers: that is, to find an approximately-minimal subset of training instances that yields the same classifier as the entire set.
Sanjoy Dasgupta, Daniel Hsu 0001, Stefanos Poulis, Xiaojin Zhu 0001
ICML3
2017 Learning with Feature Feedback: from Theory to Practice
abstract
In supervised learning, a human annotator only needs to assign each data point (document, image, etc.) its correct label. But in many situations, the human can also provide richer feedback at essentially no extra cost. In this paper, we examine a particular type of feature feedback that has been used, with some success, in information retrieval and in computer vision. We formalize two models of feature feedback, give learning algorithms for them, and quantify their usefulness in the learning process. Our experiments also show the efficacy of these methods.
Stefanos Poulis, Sanjoy Dasgupta
AISTATS1