Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maxinder S. Kanwal

dblp:202/2233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 35% Reinforcement learning · 35% Learning theory · 15%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment
benchmark environments
0.712023
DynaDojo: An Extensible Platform for Benchmarking Scaling in Dynamical System Identification · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parameter identification
dynamics identification
0.712023
DynaDojo: An Extensible Platform for Benchmarking Scaling in Dynamical System Identification · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.312017
A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
memorization and generalization
0.312017
A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks · ICML 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

out-of-distribution generalization · 0.7active learning · 0.7regularization · 0.3gradient-based optimization · 0.3dropout · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 DynaDojo: An Extensible Platform for Benchmarking Scaling in Dynamical System Identification
abstract
Modeling complex dynamical systems poses significant challenges, with traditional methods struggling to work on a variety of systems and scale to high-dimensional dynamics. In response, we present DynaDojo, a novel benchmarking platform designed for data-driven dynamical system identification. DynaDojo provides diagnostics on three ways an algorithm’s performance scales: across the number of training samples, the complexity of a dynamical system, and a target error to achieve. Furthermore, DynaDojo enables studying out-of-distribution generalization (by providing unique test conditions for each system) and active learning (by supporting closed-loop control). Through its user-friendly and easily extensible API, DynaDojo accommodates a wide range of user-defined \texttt{Algorithms}, \texttt{Systems}, and \texttt{Challenges} (evaluation metrics). The platform also prioritizes resource-efficient training with parallel processing strategies for running on a cluster. To showcase its utility, in DynaDojo 0.9, we include implementations of 7 baseline algorithms and 20 dynamical systems, along with several demos exhibiting insights researchers can glean using our platform. This work aspires to make DynaDojo a unifying benchmarking platform for system identification, paralleling the role of OpenAI’s Gym in reinforcement learning.
Logan M. Bhamidipaty, Tommy Bruzzese, Caryn Tran, Rami Ratl Mrad, Maxinder S. Kanwal
NeurIPS5
2017 A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks
abstract
We examine the role of memorization in deep learning, drawing connections to capacity, generalization, and adversarial robustness. While deep networks are capable of memorizing noise data, our results suggest that they tend to prioritize learning simple patterns first. In our experiments, we expose qualitative differences in gradient-based optimization of deep neural networks (DNNs) on noise vs.~real data. We also demonstrate that for appropriately tuned explicit regularization (e.g.,~dropout) we can degrade DNN training performance on noise datasets without compromising generalization on real data. Our analysis suggests that the notions of effective capacity which are dataset independent are unlikely to explain the generalization performance of deep networks when trained with gradient based methods because training data itself plays an important role in determining the degree of memorization.
Devansh Arpit, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Nicolas Ballas, David Krueger 0001, Emmanuel Bengio, Maxinder S. Kanwal, Tegan Maharaj, Asja Fischer, Aaron C. Courville, Yoshua Bengio, Simon Lacoste-Julien
ICML6