VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Flood Sung
dblp:202/2496
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 24% Reinforcement learning · 18% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
anticipatory planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
many-shot in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › sample-efficient imitation learning
semi-supervised imitation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
metric-based few-shot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 0.9self-reflection · 0.9reweighting · 0.9differentiated objectives · 0.9information maximization · 0.7disentangled representation learning · 0.7relation network · 0.3episodic training · 0.3deep distance metric learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting ObjectivesabstractXiaoqing Zhang, Ang Lv, Yuhan Liu, Flood Sung, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Shuo Shang, Xiuying Chen, Rui Yan. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Xiaoqing Zhang 0017, Ang Lv, Yuhan Liu 0023, Flood Sung, Wei Liu 0302, Jian Luan 0001, Shuo Shang, Xiuying Chen, Rui Yan 0001 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem SolvingabstractIn the field of large language model (LLM) post-training, the effectiveness of utilizing synthetic data generated by the LLM itself has been well-presented. However, a key question remains unaddressed: what essential information should such self-generated data encapsulate? Existing approaches only produce step-by-step problem solutions, and fail to capture the abstract meta-knowledge necessary for generalization across similar problems. Drawing insights from cognitive science, where humans employ high-level abstraction to simplify complex problems before delving into specifics, we introduce a novel self-training algorithm: LEarning to Plan before Answering (LEPA). LEPA trains the LLM to formulate anticipatory plans, which serve as abstract meta-knowledge for problem-solving, before engaging with the intricacies of problems. This approach not only outlines the solution generation path but also shields the LLM from the distraction of irrelevant details. During data generation, LEPA first crafts an anticipatory plan based on the problem, and then generates a solution that aligns with both the plan and the problem. LEPA refines the plan through self-reflection, aiming to acquire plans that are instrumental in yielding correct solutions. During model optimization, the LLM is trained to predict both the refined plans and the corresponding solutions. By efficiently extracting and utilizing the anticipatory plans, LEPA demonstrates remarkable superiority over conventional algorithms on various challenging natural language reasoning benchmarks. Flood Sung, Yang Gao 0029, Chongjie Zhang |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced DemonstrationsabstractImitation learning aims to reproduce expert behaviors without relying on an explicit reward signal. However, real-world demonstrations often present challenges, such as multi-modal, data imbalance, and expensive labeling processes. In this work, we propose a novel semi-supervised imitation learning architecture that learns disentangled behavior representations from imbalanced demonstrations using limited labeled data. Specifically, our method consists of three key components. First, we adapt the concept of semi-supervised generative adversarial networks to the imitation learning context. Second, we employ a learnable latent distribution to align the generated and expert data distributions. Finally, we utilize a regularized information maximization approach in conjunction with an approximate label prior to further improve the semi-supervised learning performance. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency of our method in learning multi-modal behaviors from imbalanced demonstrations compared to baseline methods. Huiqiao Fu, Kaiqiang Tang, Yuanyang Lu, Yiming Qi, Guizhou Deng, Flood Sung, Chunlin Chen 0001 |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2020 | RelationNet2: Deep Comparison Network for Few-Shot LearningabstractFew-shot deep learning is a topical challenge area for scaling visual recognition to open ended growth of unseen new classes with limited labeled examples. A promising approach is based on metric learning, which trains a deep embedding to support image similarity matching. Our insight is that effective general purpose matching requires non-linear comparison of features at multiple abstraction levels. We thus propose a new deep comparison network comprised of embedding and relation modules that learn multiple non-linear distance metrics based on different levels of features simultaneously. Furthermore, to reduce over-fitting and enable the use of deeper embeddings, we represent images as distributions rather than vectors via learning parameterized Gaussian noise regularization. The resulting network achieves excellent performance on both miniImageNet and tieredImageNet. Yuting Qiang, Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Timothy M. Hospedales |
IJCNN | 3 |
| 2018 | Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot LearningabstractWe present a conceptually simple, flexible, and general framework for few-shot learning, where a classifier must learn to recognise new classes given only few examples from each. Our method, called the Relation Network (RN), is trained end-to-end from scratch. During meta-learning, it learns to learn a deep distance metric to compare a small number of images within episodes, each of which is designed to simulate the few-shot setting. Once trained, a RN is able to classify images of new classes by computing relation scores between query images and the few examples of each new class without further updating the network. Besides providing improved performance on few-shot learning, our framework is easily extended to zero-shot learning. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate that our simple approach provides a unified and effective approach for both of these two tasks. Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Li Zhang 0040, Tao Xiang 0002, Philip Torr 0001, Timothy M. Hospedales |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | Deep Stock Representation Learning: From Candlestick Charts to Investment DecisionsabstractWe propose a novel investment decision strategy (IDS) based on deep learning. The performance of many IDSs is affected by stock similarity. Most existing stock similarity measurements have the problems: (a) The linear nature of many measurements cannot capture nonlinear stock dynamics; (b) The estimation of many similarity metrics (e.g. covariance) needs very long period historic data (e.g. 3K days) which cannot represent current market effectively; (c) They cannot capture translation-invariance. To solve these problems, we apply Convolutional AutoEncoder to learn a stock representation, based on which we propose a novel portfolio construction strategy by: (i) using the deeply learned representation and modularity optimisation to cluster stocks and identify diverse sectors, (ii) picking stocks within each cluster according to their Sharpe ratio (Sharpe 1994). Overall this strategy provides low-risk high-return portfolios. We use the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index (FTSE 100) data for evaluation. Results show our portfolio outperforms FTSE 100 index and many well known funds in terms of total return in 2000 trading days. Guosheng Hu, Kai Yang 0031, Flood Sung, Zhihong Zhang 0001, Neil Robertson 0002, Timothy M. Hospedales, Qiangwei Miemie |
ICASSP | 5 |