Flood Sung

dblp:202/2496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 24% Reinforcement learning · 18%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
anticipatory planning
0.912025
Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
many-shot in-context learning
0.912025
More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training
0.912025
Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.712023
Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › sample-efficient imitation learning
semi-supervised imitation learning
0.712023
Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.312018
Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
metric-based few-shot learning
0.312018
Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.312018
Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language reasoning
0.312025
Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.212023
Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.112018
Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning · CVPR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 0.9self-reflection · 0.9reweighting · 0.9differentiated objectives · 0.9information maximization · 0.7disentangled representation learning · 0.7relation network · 0.3episodic training · 0.3deep distance metric learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives
abstract
Xiaoqing Zhang, Ang Lv, Yuhan Liu, Flood Sung, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Shuo Shang, Xiuying Chen, Rui Yan. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Xiaoqing Zhang 0017, Ang Lv, Yuhan Liu 0023, Flood Sung, Wei Liu 0302, Jian Luan 0001, Shuo Shang, Xiuying Chen, Rui Yan 0001
ACL (1)4
2025 Learning to Plan Before Answering: Self-Teaching LLMs to Learn Abstract Plans for Problem Solving
abstract
In the field of large language model (LLM) post-training, the effectiveness of utilizing synthetic data generated by the LLM itself has been well-presented. However, a key question remains unaddressed: what essential information should such self-generated data encapsulate? Existing approaches only produce step-by-step problem solutions, and fail to capture the abstract meta-knowledge necessary for generalization across similar problems. Drawing insights from cognitive science, where humans employ high-level abstraction to simplify complex problems before delving into specifics, we introduce a novel self-training algorithm: LEarning to Plan before Answering (LEPA). LEPA trains the LLM to formulate anticipatory plans, which serve as abstract meta-knowledge for problem-solving, before engaging with the intricacies of problems. This approach not only outlines the solution generation path but also shields the LLM from the distraction of irrelevant details. During data generation, LEPA first crafts an anticipatory plan based on the problem, and then generates a solution that aligns with both the plan and the problem. LEPA refines the plan through self-reflection, aiming to acquire plans that are instrumental in yielding correct solutions. During model optimization, the LLM is trained to predict both the refined plans and the corresponding solutions. By efficiently extracting and utilizing the anticipatory plans, LEPA demonstrates remarkable superiority over conventional algorithms on various challenging natural language reasoning benchmarks.
Flood Sung, Yang Gao 0029, Chongjie Zhang
ICLR2
2023 Ess-InfoGAIL: Semi-supervised Imitation Learning from Imbalanced Demonstrations
abstract
Imitation learning aims to reproduce expert behaviors without relying on an explicit reward signal. However, real-world demonstrations often present challenges, such as multi-modal, data imbalance, and expensive labeling processes. In this work, we propose a novel semi-supervised imitation learning architecture that learns disentangled behavior representations from imbalanced demonstrations using limited labeled data. Specifically, our method consists of three key components. First, we adapt the concept of semi-supervised generative adversarial networks to the imitation learning context. Second, we employ a learnable latent distribution to align the generated and expert data distributions. Finally, we utilize a regularized information maximization approach in conjunction with an approximate label prior to further improve the semi-supervised learning performance. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency of our method in learning multi-modal behaviors from imbalanced demonstrations compared to baseline methods.
Huiqiao Fu, Kaiqiang Tang, Yuanyang Lu, Yiming Qi, Guizhou Deng, Flood Sung, Chunlin Chen 0001
NeurIPS6
2020 RelationNet2: Deep Comparison Network for Few-Shot Learning
abstract
Few-shot deep learning is a topical challenge area for scaling visual recognition to open ended growth of unseen new classes with limited labeled examples. A promising approach is based on metric learning, which trains a deep embedding to support image similarity matching. Our insight is that effective general purpose matching requires non-linear comparison of features at multiple abstraction levels. We thus propose a new deep comparison network comprised of embedding and relation modules that learn multiple non-linear distance metrics based on different levels of features simultaneously. Furthermore, to reduce over-fitting and enable the use of deeper embeddings, we represent images as distributions rather than vectors via learning parameterized Gaussian noise regularization. The resulting network achieves excellent performance on both miniImageNet and tieredImageNet.
Yuting Qiang, Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Timothy M. Hospedales
IJCNN3
2018 Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning
abstract
We present a conceptually simple, flexible, and general framework for few-shot learning, where a classifier must learn to recognise new classes given only few examples from each. Our method, called the Relation Network (RN), is trained end-to-end from scratch. During meta-learning, it learns to learn a deep distance metric to compare a small number of images within episodes, each of which is designed to simulate the few-shot setting. Once trained, a RN is able to classify images of new classes by computing relation scores between query images and the few examples of each new class without further updating the network. Besides providing improved performance on few-shot learning, our framework is easily extended to zero-shot learning. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate that our simple approach provides a unified and effective approach for both of these two tasks.
Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Li Zhang 0040, Tao Xiang 0002, Philip Torr 0001, Timothy M. Hospedales
CVPR1
2018 Deep Stock Representation Learning: From Candlestick Charts to Investment Decisions
abstract
We propose a novel investment decision strategy (IDS) based on deep learning. The performance of many IDSs is affected by stock similarity. Most existing stock similarity measurements have the problems: (a) The linear nature of many measurements cannot capture nonlinear stock dynamics; (b) The estimation of many similarity metrics (e.g. covariance) needs very long period historic data (e.g. 3K days) which cannot represent current market effectively; (c) They cannot capture translation-invariance. To solve these problems, we apply Convolutional AutoEncoder to learn a stock representation, based on which we propose a novel portfolio construction strategy by: (i) using the deeply learned representation and modularity optimisation to cluster stocks and identify diverse sectors, (ii) picking stocks within each cluster according to their Sharpe ratio (Sharpe 1994). Overall this strategy provides low-risk high-return portfolios. We use the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index (FTSE 100) data for evaluation. Results show our portfolio outperforms FTSE 100 index and many well known funds in terms of total return in 2000 trading days.
Guosheng Hu, Kai Yang 0031, Flood Sung, Zhihong Zhang 0001, Neil Robertson 0002, Timothy M. Hospedales, Qiangwei Miemie
ICASSP5