Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephan Zhechev

dblp:202/2569 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 50% Computational complexity · 36% Algorithms and data structures · 14%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry
computational topology
0.822020
Embeddability of Simplicial Complexes is Undecidable · SODA 2020
Computing Simplicial Representatives of Homotopy Group Elements · SODA 2018
Computational complexity
decidability
0.412020
Embeddability of Simplicial Complexes is Undecidable · SODA 2020
Computational geometry › computational topology
simplicial complex embeddability
0.412020
Embeddability of Simplicial Complexes is Undecidable · SODA 2020
Computational complexity
undecidability
0.412020
Embeddability of Simplicial Complexes is Undecidable · SODA 2020
Algorithms and data structures › exact algorithms
exponential time algorithms
0.312018
Computing Simplicial Representatives of Homotopy Group Elements · SODA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric topology · 0.4computational homotopy theory · 0.4triangulation of sphere · 0.3simplicial map · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Embeddability of Simplicial Complexes is Undecidable
abstract
We consider the following decision problem EMBEDk→d in computational topology (where k ≤ d are fixed positive integers): Given a finite simplicial complex K of dimension k, does there exist a (piecewise-linear) embedding of K into ℝd? The special case EMBED1→2 is graph planarity, which is decidable in linear time, as shown by Hopcroft and Tarjan. In higher dimensions, EMBED2→3 and EMBED3→3 are known to be decidable (as well as NP-hard), and recent results of Čadek et al. in computational homotopy theory, in combination with the classical Haefliger–Weber theorem in geometric topology, imply that EMBEDk→d can be solved in polynomial time for any fixed pair (k, d) of dimensions in the so-called metastable range . Here, by contrast, we prove that EMBEDk→d is algorithmically undecidable for almost all pairs of dimensions outside the metastable range, namely for . This almost completely resolves the decidability vs. undecidability of EMBEDk→d in higher dimensions and establishes a sharp dichotomy between polynomial-time solvability and undecidability. Our result complements (and in a wide range of dimensions strengthens) earlier results of Matoušek, Tancer, and the second author, who showed that EMBEDk→d is undecidable for 4 ≤ k ϵ {d – 1, d}, and NP-hard for all remaining pairs (k, d) outside the metastable range and satisfying d ≥ 4.
Marek Filakovský, Uli Wagner 0001, Stephan Zhechev
SODA3
2018 Computing Simplicial Representatives of Homotopy Group Elements
abstract
A central problem of algebraic topology is to understand the homotopy groups πd(X) of a topological space X. For the computational version of the problem, it is well known that there is no algorithm to decide whether the fundamental group π1(Χ) of a given finite simplicial complex X is trivial. On the other hand, there are several algorithms that, given a finite simplicial complex X that is simply connected (i.e., with π1(Χ) trivial), compute the higher homotopy group πd(X) for any given d ≥ 2. However, these algorithms come with a caveat: They compute the isomorphism type of πd(Χ), d ≥ 2 as an abstract finitely generated abelian group given by generators and relations, but they work with very implicit representations of the elements of πd(Χ). Converting elements of this abstract group into explicit geometric maps from the d-dimensional sphere Sd to Χ has been an important open question in the emerging field of computational homotopy theory. Here we present an algorithm that, given a simply connected simplicial complex Χ, computes πd(Χ) and represents its elements as simplicial maps from a suitable triangulation of the d-sphere Sd to Χ. For fixed d, the algorithm runs in time exponential in size(X), the number of simplices of Χ. Moreover, we prove that this is optimal: For every fixed d ≥ 2, we construct a family of simply connected simplicial complexes Χ such that for any simplicial map representing a generator of πd(Χ), the size of the triangulation of Sd on which the map is defined is exponential in size(X).
Marek Filakovský, Peter Franek, Uli Wagner 0001, Stephan Zhechev
SODA4