Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kathryn Kaufman

dblp:202/3371 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
computational phantoms
0.112009
An Algorithm for Lymphatic Node Placement in Hybrid Computational Phantoms - Applications to Radionuclide Therapy Dosimetry · Proc. IEEE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voxelization · 0.1random sampling · 0.1monte carlo simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 An Algorithm for Lymphatic Node Placement in Hybrid Computational Phantoms - Applications to Radionuclide Therapy Dosimetry
abstract
The presence of lymphatic nodes within computational human phantoms is critical to the evaluation of tissue doses in lymphoma patients treated with targeted radionuclide therapy. Furthermore, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) now considers the lymphatic nodes to be a radiosensitive tissue of the remainder tissues of the effective dose as defined in ICRP Publication 103. Lymphatic nodes have previously not been included within the structure of stylized phantoms and are only present within a few voxel-based phantoms through manual retagging of voxels of the residual soft tissues. In this paper, an automated methodology is introduced whereby lymphatic nodes are placed-in an anatomically realistic fashion-within the University of Florida adult male reference hybrid phantom. First, a total of 16 lymphatic node anatomical sites are defined within the phantom. These include the extrathoracic, cervical, thoracic (upper and lower), breast (left and right), mesentery (left and right), axillary (left and right), cubital (left and right), inguinal (left and right), and popliteal (left and right) nodal regions. Secondly, individual lymphatic node positions are randomly sampled within spherical tissue regions centered at each previously selected lymphatic node site. Thirdly, smaller voxelized tissue spheres representing individual lymphatic nodes are then created to populate each nodal region of the phantom using a nominal nodal diameter. This process is repeated until a total lymphatic node mass is achieved to match age-dependent total reference masses derived from ICRP Publication 66 and 89 data. An illustrative set of radionuclide S-values for131I are presented whereby regional lymphatic nodes are considered to be independent source and target regions of a reference lymphoma patient. As nodal size can easily be changed within individual nodal regions, the lymphatic node model suggested in this paper can be used to obtain realistic dosimetry for lymphoma patients treated with radionuclide therapy.
Choonsik Lee, Kathryn Kaufman, Deanna Hasenauer Pafundi, Wesley E. Bolch
Proc. IEEE2