Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liwei Qian

dblp:202/7754 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8913-9620ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 52% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event prediction
1.012026
Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models · WWW 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models · WWW 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
self-correction
1.012026
Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models · WWW 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning
0.912025
Can Large Language Models Tackle Graph Partitioning? · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.312026
Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models · WWW 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
temporal reasoning
0.312026
Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph reasoning
0.312025
Can Large Language Models Tackle Graph Partitioning? · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

refining pipeline · 1.7reasoning · 1.7coarsening · 1.7self-correction · 1.0large language model · 1.0bidirectional reasoning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Thinking Bidirectionally: A Reasoning and Self-Correction Approach for Text-Based Event Prediction with Large Language Models
abstract
Using Web Mining and Content Analysis to find and understand clues from the massive amount of unstructured text online is very important for predicting future events and providing early risk warnings in important fields like finance and public safety. While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit potential in processing and understanding text, current text-based event prediction faces two primary challenges: first, an insufficient utilization of potential information within the text, such as causal relationships and latent associations, and second, limited predictive reliability constrained by issues like the LLM's own ability and hallucinations. To address these challenges, we propose a novel event prediction framework, Bidirectional Reasoning with Self-Correction (BRSC). BRSC comprises two complementary reasoning dimensions: temporal deductive reasoning, which analyzes the trajectory of historical events along the timeline to enable accurate trend extrapolation, and synchronic associative reasoning, which deeply mines details and latent connections from documents within a specific time window to extended semantic information. In addition, we use a self-correction mechanism that identifies and rectifies potential hallucinations and errors during the reasoning process. Extensive experiments on international relations event prediction demonstrate that BRSC achieves significant improvements over several leading LLM-based methods.
Liwei Qian, Hang Zhang 0008, Yiheng Wu, Yanmin Li, Mengna Zhu, Lihua Liu 0002, Jibing Wu
WWW1
2025 Can Large Language Models Tackle Graph Partitioning?
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in understanding complex tasks and have achieved commendable performance in graph-related tasks, such as node classification, link prediction, and subgraph classification.These tasks primarily depend on the local reasoning capabilities of the graph structure.However, research has yet to address the graph partitioning task that requires global perception abilities.Our preliminary findings reveal that vanilla LLMs can only handle graph partitioning on extremely small-scale graphs.To overcome this limitation, we propose a three-phase pipeline to empower LLMs for large-scale graph partitioning: coarsening, reasoning, and refining.The coarsening phase reduces graph complexity.The reasoning phase captures both global and local patterns to generate a coarse partition.The refining phase ensures topological consistency by projecting the coarse-grained partitioning results back to the original graph structure.Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework enables LLMs to perform graph partitioning across varying graph scales, validating both the effectiveness of LLMs for partitioning tasks and the practical utility of our proposed methodology.
Yiheng Wu, Ningchao Ge, Yanmin Li, Liwei Qian, Mengna Zhu, Haiwen Chen, Jibing Wu
EMNLP4
2023 Quality improvement method for high-end equipment's functional requirements based on user stories
abstract
Aiming at problems such as incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate requirements that often occur in the process of obtaining high-end equipment functional requirements, this paper presents a requirement quality improvement method. Referring to the agile development theory of requirements engineering, the quality improvement method constructs a functional requirement model based on user stories, defines the concept of functional requirement quality, designs functional requirement quality evaluation criteria, and constructs a functional requirement quality evaluation process. A case study and sensitivity analysis of new energy vehicle requirement development are conducted to confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the method, and the experimental results show the superiority of the proposed method in improving the quality of high-end equipment functional requirements.
Xiangqian Xu, Yajie Dou, Liwei Qian, Jiang Jiang 0001, Ke-Wei Yang 0001, Yuejin Tan
Adv. Eng. Informatics3