Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Irina Rabkina

dblp:203/1544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 73% Image recognition and object detection · 27%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › analogical reasoning
analogical learning
0.412019
Human-Like Sketch Object Recognition via Analogical Learning · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
relational representation
0.412019
Human-Like Sketch Object Recognition via Analogical Learning · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind
0.312017
AToM: An Analogical Theory of Mind · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative visual representation · 0.4analogical generalization · 0.4structure mapping · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ToMCAT: Benchmark for Socially Assistive Robots with Theory of Mind of Children Assembling Tangram Puzzles
abstract
Assistive robots will be more effective if they can accurately reason about the intentions and beliefs of the user (i.e., have Theory of Mind (ToM)). ToM benchmarks allow us to examine how well an artificial agent (e.g., robot) is able to do ToM reasoning in a given scenario. However, there is a need for ToM benchmarks that are more representative of the challenges faced in assistive robotics. Existing benchmarks from AI and HRI make simplifying assumptions, such as simply defined goals, plans that are indicative of goals, and no user errors. To address the challenges from relaxing these assumptions, we propose the Theory of Mind of Children Assembling Tangrams (ToMCAT) dataset. The data is derived from videos of children building tangram puzzles while being assisted by a social robot. As a baseline benchmark, we evaluated two approaches for how well they can recognize which puzzle this child is building based on a single observation. Analogical reasoning correctly recognized the puzzle more than 75% of the time and had perfect accuracy for puzzle states that were close to complete. However, an out-of-the-box commercial LLM correctly recognized the puzzle only 60% of the time and was accurate on less than 80% of the completed puzzles. Our results suggest that the ToMCAT dataset offers challenges for recognizing the intended puzzle of a child. Furthermore, the dataset provides opportunities to examine additional ToM reasoning capabilities. Overall, the ToMCAT dataset provides a useful benchmark to facilitate the advancement of ToM reasoning for assistive robotics.
Jason R. Wilson, Irina Rabkina, Mark Roberts, Laura M. Hiatt
RO-MAN2
2022 Efficient and Effortful Theory of Mind Reasoning in the AToM Cognitive Model
Irina Rabkina, Clifton James McFate
CogSci1
2020 Corrective Processes in Modeling Reference Resolution
Constantine Nakos, Irina Rabkina, Samuel Hill, Kenneth D. Forbus
CogSci2
2019 Human-Like Sketch Object Recognition via Analogical Learning
abstract
Deep learning systems can perform well on some image recognition tasks. However, they have serious limitations, including requiring far more training data than humans do and being fooled by adversarial examples. By contrast, analogical learning over relational representations tends to be far more data-efficient, requiring only human-like amounts of training data. This paper introduces an approach that combines automatically constructed qualitative visual representations with analogical learning to tackle a hard computer vision problem, object recognition from sketches. Results from the MNIST dataset and a novel dataset, the Coloring Book Objects dataset, are provided. Comparison to existing approaches indicates that analogical generalization can be used to identify sketched objects from these datasets with several orders of magnitude fewer examples than deep learning systems require.
Kezhen Chen, Irina Rabkina, Matthew D. McLure, Kenneth D. Forbus
AAAI2
2019 Children's Sentential Complement Use Leads the Theory of Mind Development Period: Evidence from the CHILDES Corpus
Irina Rabkina, Constantine Nakos, Kenneth D. Forbus
CogSci1
2018 Bootstrapping from Language in the Analogical Theory of Mind Model
Irina Rabkina, Clifton James McFate, Kenneth D. Forbus
CogSci1
2017 Towards an Analogical Theory of Mind
Irina Rabkina, Clifton James McFate, Kenneth D. Forbus, Christian Hoyos
CogSci1
2017 AToM: An Analogical Theory of Mind
abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) has been well studied in psychology. It is what gives adults the ability to predict other people’s beliefs, desires, and related actions. When ToM is not yet developed, as in young children, social interaction is difficult. A cognitive system that interacts with humans on a regular basis would benefit from having a ToM. In this extended abstract, I propose a computational model of ToM, Analogical Theory of Mind (AToM), based on Bach’s [2012, 2014] theoretical Structure-Mapping model of ToM. Completed work demonstrates the plausibility of AToM. Future steps include a full implementation and test of AToM.
Irina Rabkina
IJCAI1
2016 An Analogical Model of Pretense
Irina Rabkina, Kenneth D. Forbus
CogSci1