Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Victor-Emmanuel Brunel
dblp:203/4175
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 41% Learning theory · 41% Reinforcement learning · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 80% Algorithms and data structures · 20% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
determinantal point process |
1.6 | 5 | 2021 | Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · ICLR 2021 Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2019 Learning Signed Determinantal Point Processes through the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
1.3 | 3 | 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spaces · COLT 2023 Learning rates for Gaussian mixtures under group action · COLT 2019 Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
1.0 | 3 | 2019 | Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2019 Learning rates for Gaussian mixtures under group action · COLT 2019 Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Bandits · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › asymptotic estimation theory
asymptotic normality |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spaces · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy evaluation
inverse propensity scoring |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
m-estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spaces · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › determinantal point process
nonsymmetric determinantal point process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2019 Rates of estimation for determinantal point processes · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Bandits · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Bandits · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
robust statistics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Bandits · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
method of moments |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Signed Determinantal Point Processes through the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
optimal sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spaces · COLT 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › riemannian optimization
geodesic convexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spaces · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning rates for Gaussian mixtures under group action · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning rates for Gaussian mixtures under group action · COLT 2019 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures
polynomial-time algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Signed Determinantal Point Processes through the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metric space geometry · 1.3consistency analysis · 1.3method of moments · 0.9propensity scoring · 0.7exponential smoothing regularization · 0.7scalable learning · 0.5determinantal point process · 0.5MAP inference · 0.5sampling algorithms · 0.4kernel decomposition · 0.4isometry group action · 0.4group invariance · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for Large Action SpacesabstractIn interactive systems, actions are often correlated, presenting an opportunity for more sample-efficient off-policy evaluation (OPE) and learning (OPL) in large action spaces. We introduce a unified Bayesian framework to capture these correlations through structured and informative priors. In this framework, we propose sDM, a generic Bayesian approach for OPE and OPL, grounded in both algorithmic and theoretical foundations. Notably, sDM leverages action correlations without compromising computational efficiency. Moreover, inspired by online Bayesian bandits, we introduce Bayesian metrics that assess the average performance of algorithms across multiple problem instances, deviating from the conventional worst-case assessments. We analyze sDM in OPE and OPL, highlighting the benefits of leveraging action correlations. Empirical evidence showcases the strong performance of sDM. Imad Aouali, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, David Rohde, Anna Korba |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | Concentration of empirical barycenters in metric spacesabstractBarycenters (aka Fréchet means) were introduced in statistics in the 1940’s and popularized in the fields of shape statistics and, later, in optimal transport and matrix analysis. They provide the most natural extension of linear averaging to non-Euclidean geometries, which is perhaps the most basic and widely used tool in data science. In various setups, their asymptotic properties, such as laws of large numbers and central limit theorems, have been established, but their non-asymptotic behaviour is still not well understood. In this work, we prove finite sample concentration inequalities (namely, generalizations of Hoeffding’s and Bernstein’s inequalities) for barycenters of i.i.d. random variables in metric spaces with non-positive curvature in Alexandrov’s sense. As a byproduct, we also obtain PAC guarantees for a stochastic online algorithm that computes the barycenter of a finite collection of points in a non-positively curved space. We also discuss extensions of our results to spaces with possibly positive curvature. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Jordan Serres |
ALT | 1 |
| 2024 | Unified PAC-Bayesian Study of Pessimism for Offline Policy Learning with Regularized Importance SamplingabstractOff-policy learning (OPL) often involves minimizing a risk estimator based on importance weighting to correct bias from the logging policy used to collect data. However, this method can produce an estimator with a high variance. A common solution is to regularize the importance weights and learn the policy by minimizing an estimator with penalties derived from generalization bounds specific to the estimator. This approach, known as pessimism, has gained recent attention but lacks a unified framework for analysis. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive PAC-Bayesian framework to examine pessimism with regularized importance weighting. We derive a tractable PAC-Bayesian generalization bound that universally applies to common importance weight regularizations, enabling their comparison within a single framework. Our empirical results challenge common understanding, demonstrating the effectiveness of standard IW regularization techniques. Imad Aouali, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, David Rohde, Anna Korba |
UAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Geodesically convex M-estimation in metric spacesabstractWe study the asymptotic properties of geodesically convex $M$-estimation on non-linear spaces. Namely, we prove that under very minimal assumptions besides geodesic convexity of the cost function, one can obtain consistency and asymptotic normality, which are fundamental properties in statistical inference. Our results extend the Euclidean theory of convex $M$-estimation; They also generalize limit theorems on non-linear spaces which, essentially, were only known for barycenters, allowing to consider robust alternatives that are defined through non-smooth $M$-estimation procedures. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel |
COLT | 1 |
| 2023 | Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy LearningabstractOff-policy learning (OPL) aims at finding improved policies from logged bandit data, often by minimizing the inverse propensity scoring (IPS) estimator of the risk. In this work, we investigate a smooth regularization for IPS, for which we derive a two-sided PAC-Bayes generalization bound. The bound is tractable, scalable, interpretable and provides learning certificates. In particular, it is also valid for standard IPS without making the assumption that the importance weights are bounded. We demonstrate the relevance of our approach and its favorable performance through a set of learning tasks. Since our bound holds for standard IPS, we are able to provide insight into when regularizing IPS is useful. Namely, we identify cases where regularization might not be needed. This goes against the belief that, in practice, clipped IPS often enjoys favorable performance than standard IPS in OPL. Imad Aouali, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, David Rohde, Anna Korba |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Statistical guarantees for generative models without dominationabstractIn this paper, we introduce a convenient framework for studying (adversarial) generative models from a statistical perspective. It consists in modeling the generative device as a smooth transformation of the unit hypercube of a dimension that is much smaller than that of the ambient space and measuring the quality of the generative model by means of an integral probability metric. In the particular case of integral probability metric defined through a smoothness class, we establish a risk bound quantifying the role of various parameters. In particular, it clearly shows the impact of dimension reduction on the error of the generative model. Nicolas Schreuder, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Arnak S. Dalalyan |
ALT | 2 |
| 2021 | Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes
Mike Gartrell, Insu Han, Elvis Dohmatob, Jennifer Gillenwater, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2020 | A nonasymptotic law of iterated logarithm for general M-estimatorsabstractM-estimators are ubiquitous in machine learning and statistical learning theory. They are used both for defining prediction strategies and for evaluating their precision. In this paper, we propose the first non-asymptotic ’any-time’ deviation bounds for general M-estimators, where ’any-time’ means that the bound holds with a prescribed probability for every sample size. These bounds are non-asymptotic versions of the law of iterated logarithm. They are established under general assumptions such as Lipschitz continuity of the loss function and (local) curvature of thepopulation risk. These conditions are satisfied for most examples used in machine learning, including those ensuring robustness to outliers and to heavy tailed distributions. As an example of application, we consider the problem of best arm identification in a stochastic multi-arm bandit setting. We show that the established bound can be converted into a new algorithm, with provably optimal theoretical guarantees. Numerical experiments illustrating the validity of the algorithm are reported. Arnak S. Dalalyan, Nicolas Schreuder, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2019 | Learning rates for Gaussian mixtures under group actionabstractWe study the pointwise maximum likelihood estimation rates for a class of Gaussian mixtures that are invariant under the action of some isometry group. This model is also known as multi-reference alignment, where random rotations of a given vector are observed, up to Gaussian noise. We completely characterize the speed of the maximum likelihood estimator, by giving a comprehensive description of the likelihood geometry of the model. We show that the unknown parameter can always be decomposed into two components, one of which can be estimated at the fast rate $n^{-1/2}$, the other one being estimated at the slower rate $n^{-1/4}$. We provide an algebraic description and a geometric interpretation of these facts. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel |
COLT | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point ProcessesabstractDeterminantal point processes (DPPs) have attracted substantial attention as an elegant probabilistic model that captures the balance between quality and diversity within sets. DPPs are conventionally parameterized by a positive semi-definite kernel matrix, and this symmetric kernel encodes only repulsive interactions between items. These so-called symmetric DPPs have significant expressive power, and have been successfully applied to a variety of machine learning tasks, including recommendation systems, information retrieval, and automatic summarization, among many others. Efficient algorithms for learning symmetric DPPs and sampling from these models have been reasonably well studied. However, relatively little attention has been given to nonsymmetric DPPs, which relax the symmetric constraint on the kernel. Nonsymmetric DPPs allow for both repulsive and attractive item interactions, which can significantly improve modeling power, resulting in a model that may better fit for some applications. We present a method that enables a tractable algorithm, based on maximum likelihood estimation, for learning nonsymmetric DPPs from data composed of observed subsets. Our method imposes a particular decomposition of the nonsymmetric kernel that enables such tractable learning algorithms, which we analyze both theoretically and experimentally. We evaluate our model on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating improved predictive performance compared to symmetric DPPs, which have previously shown strong performance on modeling tasks associated with these datasets. Mike Gartrell, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Elvis Dohmatob, Syrine Krichene |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Best Arm Identification for Contaminated BanditsabstractThis paper studies active learning in the context of robust statistics. Specifically, we propose a variant of the Best Arm Identification problem for contaminated bandits, where each arm pull has probability epsilon of generating a sample from an arbitrary contamination distribution instead of the true underlying distribution. The goal is to identify the best (or approximately best) true distribution with high probability, with a secondary goal of providing guarantees on the quality of this distribution. The primary challenge of the contaminated bandit setting is that the true distributions are only partially identifiable, even with infinite samples. To address this, we develop tight, non-asymptotic sample complexity bounds for high-probability estimation of the first two robust moments (median and median absolute deviation) from contaminated samples. These concentration inequalities are the main technical contributions of the paper and may be of independent interest. Using these results, we adapt several classical Best Arm Identification algorithms to the contaminated bandit setting and derive sample complexity upper bounds for our problem. Finally, we provide matching information-theoretic lower bounds on the sample complexity (up to a small logarithmic factor). Jason M. Altschuler, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Alan Malek |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2018 | Learning Signed Determinantal Point Processes through the Principal Minor Assignment ProblemabstractSymmetric determinantal point processes (DPP) are a class of probabilistic models that encode the random selection of items that have a repulsive behavior. They have attracted a lot of attention in machine learning, where returning diverse sets of items is sought for. Sampling and learning these symmetric DPP's is pretty well understood. In this work, we consider a new class of DPP's, which we call signed DPP's, where we break the symmetry and allow attractive behaviors. We set the ground for learning signed DPP's through a method of moments, by solving the so called principal assignment problem for a class of matrices $K$ that satisfy $K_{i,j}=\pm K_{j,i}$, $i\neq j$, in polynomial time. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Rates of estimation for determinantal point processesabstractDeterminantal point processes (DPPs) have wide-ranging applications in machine learning, where they are used to enforce the notion of diversity in subset selection problems. Many estimators have been proposed, but surprisingly the basic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) have received little attention. In this paper, we study the local geometry of the expected log-likelihood function to prove several rates of convergence for the MLE. We also give a complete characterization of the case where the MLE converges at a parametric rate. Even in the latter case, we also exhibit a potential curse of dimensionality where the asymptotic variance of the MLE is exponentially large in the dimension of the problem. Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Ankur Moitra, Philippe Rigollet, John Urschel |
COLT | 1 |
| 2017 | Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and CyclesabstractDeterminantal Point Processes (DPPs) are a family of probabilistic models that have a repulsive behavior, and lend themselves naturally to many tasks in machine learning where returning a diverse set of objects is important. While there are fast algorithms for sampling, marginalization and conditioning, much less is known about learning the parameters of a DPP. Our contribution is twofold: (i) we establish the optimal sample complexity achievable in this problem and show that it is governed by a natural parameter, which we call the cycle sparsity; (ii) we propose a provably fast combinatorial algorithm that implements the method of moments efficiently and achieves optimal sample complexity. Finally, we give experimental results that confirm our theoretical findings. John Urschel, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, Ankur Moitra, Philippe Rigollet |
ICML | 2 |