Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erik A. Daxberger
dblp:203/4464
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 15% 3D vision · 14% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | MMEgo: Towards Building Egocentric Multimodal LLMs for Video QA · ICLR 2025 MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning |
1.6 | 3 | 2022 | Adapting the Linearised Laplace Model Evidence for Modern Deep Learning · ICML 2022 Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2021 Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inference · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.2 | 3 | 2022 | Adapting the Linearised Laplace Model Evidence for Modern Deep Learning · ICML 2022 Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inference · ICML 2021 Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
3d spatial reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
spatial understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMEgo: Towards Building Egocentric Multimodal LLMs for Video QA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Mixed-Variable Bayesian Optimization · IJCAI 2020 Distributed Batch Gaussian Process Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
linearized laplace approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adapting the Linearised Laplace Model Evidence for Modern Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
posterior predictive distribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inference · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Batch Gaussian Process Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
gaussian process optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Batch Gaussian Process Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
memory mechanism |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMEgo: Towards Building Egocentric Multimodal LLMs for Video QA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Mixed-Variable Bayesian Optimization · IJCAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed constraint optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Batch Gaussian Process Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal large language model · 0.9multimodal architecture · 0.9memory pointer prompting · 0.9de-biasing evaluation · 0.9stochastic approximation · 0.6normalisation layers · 0.6subnetwork selection · 0.5linearized laplace approximation · 0.5laplace approximation · 0.5hessian computation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MM-Spatial: Exploring 3D Spatial Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
Erik A. Daxberger, Nina Wenzel, David Griffiths, Haiming Gang, Justin Lazarow, Gefen Kohavi, Marcin Eichner, Yinfei Yang, Afshin Dehghan, Peter Grasch |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2025 | MMEgo: Towards Building Egocentric Multimodal LLMs for Video QAabstractThis research aims to comprehensively explore building a multimodal foundation model for egocentric video understanding.
To achieve this goal, we work on three fronts.
First, as there is a lack of QA data for egocentric video understanding, we automatically generate 7M high-quality QA samples for egocentric videos ranging from 30 seconds to one hour long in Ego4D based on human-annotated data.
This is one of the largest egocentric QA datasets.
Second, we contribute a challenging egocentric QA benchmark with 629 videos and 7,026 questions to evaluate the models' ability in recognizing and memorizing visual details across videos of varying lengths. We introduce a new de-biasing evaluation method to help mitigate the unavoidable language bias present in the models being evaluated.
Third, we propose a specialized multimodal architecture featuring a novel ``Memory Pointer Prompting" mechanism. This design includes a global glimpse step to gain an overarching understanding of the entire video and identify key visual information, followed by a fallback step that utilizes the key visual information to generate responses. This enables the model to more effectively comprehend extended video content.
With the data, benchmark, and model, we build MM-Ego, an egocentric multimodal LLM that shows powerful performance on egocentric video understanding. Hanrong Ye, Haotian Zhang 0005, Erik A. Daxberger, Lin Chen 0010, Zongyu Lin, Yanghao Li, Bowen Zhang 0002, Haoxuan You, Dan Xu 0002, Zhe Gan, Jiasen Lu, Yinfei Yang |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Adapting the Linearised Laplace Model Evidence for Modern Deep LearningabstractThe linearised Laplace method for estimating model uncertainty has received renewed attention in the Bayesian deep learning community. The method provides reliable error bars and admits a closed-form expression for the model evidence, allowing for scalable selection of model hyperparameters. In this work, we examine the assumptions behind this method, particularly in conjunction with model selection. We show that these interact poorly with some now-standard tools of deep learning–stochastic approximation methods and normalisation layers–and make recommendations for how to better adapt this classic method to the modern setting. We provide theoretical support for our recommendations and validate them empirically on MLPs, classic CNNs, residual networks with and without normalisation layers, generative autoencoders and transformers. Javier Antorán, David Janz, James Urquhart Allingham, Erik A. Daxberger, Riccardo Barbano, Eric T. Nalisnick, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork InferenceabstractThe Bayesian paradigm has the potential to solve core issues of deep neural networks such as poor calibration and data inefficiency. Alas, scaling Bayesian inference to large weight spaces often requires restrictive approximations. In this work, we show that it suffices to perform inference over a small subset of model weights in order to obtain accurate predictive posteriors. The other weights are kept as point estimates. This subnetwork inference framework enables us to use expressive, otherwise intractable, posterior approximations over such subsets. In particular, we implement subnetwork linearized Laplace as a simple, scalable Bayesian deep learning method: We first obtain a MAP estimate of all weights and then infer a full-covariance Gaussian posterior over a subnetwork using the linearized Laplace approximation. We propose a subnetwork selection strategy that aims to maximally preserve the model’s predictive uncertainty. Empirically, our approach compares favorably to ensembles and less expressive posterior approximations over full networks. Erik A. Daxberger, Eric T. Nalisnick, James Urquhart Allingham, Javier Antorán, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningabstractBayesian formulations of deep learning have been shown to have compelling theoretical properties and offer practical functional benefits, such as improved predictive uncertainty quantification and model selection. The Laplace approximation (LA) is a classic, and arguably the simplest family of approximations for the intractable posteriors of deep neural networks. Yet, despite its simplicity, the LA is not as popular as alternatives like variational Bayes or deep ensembles. This may be due to assumptions that the LA is expensive due to the involved Hessian computation, that it is difficult to implement, or that it yields inferior results. In this work we show that these are misconceptions: we (i) review the range of variants of the LA including versions with minimal cost overhead; (ii) introduce "laplace", an easy-to-use software library for PyTorch offering user-friendly access to all major flavors of the LA; and (iii) demonstrate through extensive experiments that the LA is competitive with more popular alternatives in terms of performance, while excelling in terms of computational cost. We hope that this work will serve as a catalyst to a wider adoption of the LA in practical deep learning, including in domains where Bayesian approaches are not typically considered at the moment. Erik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen, Matthias Bauer 0001, Philipp Hennig |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Mixed-Variable Bayesian OptimizationabstractThe optimization of expensive to evaluate, black-box, mixed-variable functions, i.e. functions that have continuous and discrete inputs, is a difficult and yet pervasive problem in science and engineering. In Bayesian optimization (BO), special cases of this problem that consider fully continuous or fully discrete domains have been widely studied. However, few methods exist for mixed-variable domains and none of them can handle discrete constraints that arise in many real-world applications. In this paper, we introduce MiVaBo, a novel BO algorithm for the efficient optimization of mixed-variable functions combining a linear surrogate model based on expressive feature representations with Thompson sampling. We propose an effective method to optimize its acquisition function, a challenging problem for mixed-variable domains, making MiVaBo the first BO method that can handle complex constraints over the discrete variables. Moreover, we provide the first convergence analysis of a mixed-variable BO algorithm. Finally, we show that MiVaBo is significantly more sample efficient than state-of-the-art mixed-variable BO algorithms on several hyperparameter tuning tasks, including the tuning of deep generative models. Erik A. Daxberger, Anastasia Makarova, Matteo Turchetta, Andreas Krause 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Sample-Efficient Optimization in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Models via Weighted RetrainingabstractMany important problems in science and engineering, such as drug design, involve optimizing an expensive black-box objective function over a complex, high-dimensional, and structured input space. Although machine learning techniques have shown promise in solving such problems, existing approaches substantially lack sample efficiency. We introduce an improved method for efficient black-box optimization, which performs the optimization in the low-dimensional, continuous latent manifold learned by a deep generative model. In contrast to previous approaches, we actively steer the generative model to maintain a latent manifold that is highly useful for efficiently optimizing the objective. We achieve this by periodically retraining the generative model on the data points queried along the optimization trajectory, as well as weighting those data points according to their objective function value. This weighted retraining can be easily implemented on top of existing methods, and is empirically shown to significantly improve their efficiency and performance on synthetic and real-world optimization problems. Austin Tripp, Erik A. Daxberger, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Embedding models for episodic knowledge graphs
Yunpu Ma, Volker Tresp, Erik A. Daxberger |
J. Web Semant. | 3 |
| 2017 | Distributed Batch Gaussian Process OptimizationabstractThis paper presents a novel distributed batch Gaussian process upper confidence bound (DB-GP-UCB) algorithm for performing batch Bayesian optimization (BO) of highly complex, costly-to-evaluate black-box objective functions. In contrast to existing batch BO algorithms, DB-GP-UCB can jointly optimize a batch of inputs (as opposed to selecting the inputs of a batch one at a time) while still preserving scalability in the batch size. To realize this, we generalize GP-UCB to a new batch variant amenable to a Markov approximation, which can then be naturally formulated as a multi-agent distributed constraint optimization problem in order to fully exploit the efficiency of its state-of-the-art solvers for achieving linear time in the batch size. Our DB-GP-UCB algorithm offers practitioners the flexibility to trade off between the approximation quality and time efficiency by varying the Markov order. We provide a theoretical guarantee for the convergence rate of DB-GP-UCB via bounds on its cumulative regret. Empirical evaluation on synthetic benchmark objective functions and a real-world optimization problem shows that DB-GP-UCB outperforms the state-of-the-art batch BO algorithms. Erik A. Daxberger, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICML | 1 |