Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evans Etrue

dblp:203/4488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › structured bandit
clustering of bandits
0.312017
On Context-Dependent Clustering of Bandits · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.312017
On Context-Dependent Clustering of Bandits · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.312017
On Context-Dependent Clustering of Bandits · ICML 2017
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112017
On Context-Dependent Clustering of Bandits · ICML 2017
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 On Context-Dependent Clustering of Bandits
abstract
We investigate a novel cluster-of-bandit algorithm CAB for collaborative recommendation tasks that implements the underlying feedback sharing mechanism by estimating user neighborhoods in a context-dependent manner. CAB makes sharp departures from the state of the art by incorporating collaborative effects into inference, as well as learning processes in a manner that seamlessly interleaves explore-exploit tradeoffs and collaborative steps. We prove regret bounds for CAB under various data-dependent assumptions which exhibit a crisp dependence on the expected number of clusters over the users, a natural measure of the statistical difficulty of the learning task. Experiments on production and real-world datasets show that CAB offers significantly increased prediction performance against a representative pool of state-of-the-art methods.
Claudio Gentile, Shuai Li 0011, Purushottam Kar, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Giovanni Zappella, Evans Etrue
ICML6