Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hao Henry Zhou

dblp:203/4490 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-6172-3534ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 41% Generative modeling · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Medical and health informatics · 66% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 20% Computational social science and digital humanities · 14%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
conditional normalizing flow
0.412019
DUAL-GLOW: Conditional Flow-Based Generative Model for Modality Transfer · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional estimation
0.412019
Non-Parametric Sparse Additive Auto-Regressive Network Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.412019
Non-Parametric Sparse Additive Auto-Regressive Network Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.412019
DUAL-GLOW: Conditional Flow-Based Generative Model for Modality Transfer · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling
0.412019
Non-Parametric Sparse Additive Auto-Regressive Network Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image synthesis
0.412019
DUAL-GLOW: Conditional Flow-Based Generative Model for Modality Transfer · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift
0.312017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.312017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network
0.112019
DUAL-GLOW: Conditional Flow-Based Generative Model for Modality Transfer · ICCV 2019
Computational social science and digital humanities
crime analysis
0.112019
Non-Parametric Sparse Additive Auto-Regressive Network Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Medical and health informatics › neurodegenerative disease analysis
alzheimer's disease study
0.112017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain imaging genetics
0.112017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
alzheimer's disease
0.112016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Medical and health informatics
clinical data analysis
0.112016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 1.1reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.8relation network · 0.8mixing properties of markov chains · 0.8invertible network · 0.8empirical process theory · 0.8conditional distribution · 0.8l2-consistency analysis · 0.6high-dimensional regression · 0.6continuous optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 DUAL-GLOW: Conditional Flow-Based Generative Model for Modality Transfer
abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is an imaging modality for diagnosing a number of neurological diseases. In contrast to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), PET is costly and involves injecting a radioactive substance into the patient. Motivated by developments in modality transfer in vision, we study the generation of certain types of PET images from MRI data. We derive new flow-based generative models which we show perform well in this small sample size regime (much smaller than dataset sizes available in standard vision tasks). Our formulation, DUAL-GLOW, is based on two invertible networks and a relation network that maps the latent spaces to each other. We discuss how given the prior distribution, learning the conditional distribution of PET given the MRI image reduces to obtaining the conditional distribution between the two latent codes w.r.t. the two image types. We also extend our framework to leverage "side" information (or attributes) when available. By controlling the PET generation through "conditioning" on age, our model is also able to capture brain FDG-PET (hypometabolism) changes, as a function of age. We present experiments on the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset with 826 subjects, and obtain good performance in PET image synthesis, qualitatively and quantitatively better than recent works.
Haoliang Sun, Ronak Mehta, Hao Henry Zhou, Zhichun Huang, Sterling C. Johnson, Vivek Prabhakaran
ICCV3
2019 Non-Parametric Sparse Additive Auto-Regressive Network Models
abstract
Consider a multi-variate time series (Xt)t=0T, where Xt∈ Rdwhich may represent spike train responses for multiple neurons in a brain, crime event data across multiple regions, and many others. An important challenge associated with these time series models is to estimate an influence network between the d variables, especially when d is large, meaning we are in the high-dimensional setting. Prior work has focused on parametric vector auto-regressive models. However, parametric approaches are somewhat restrictive in practice. In this paper, we use the non-parametric sparse additive model (SpAM) framework to address this challenge. Using a combination of β and φ-mixing properties of Markov chains and empirical process techniques for reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHSs), we provide upper bounds on mean-squared error in terms of the sparsity s, the logarithm of the dimension log d, the number of time points T, and the smoothness of the RKHSs. Our rates are sharp up to logarithm factors in many cases. We also provide numerical experiments that support our theoretical results and display the potential advantages of using our non-parametric SpAM framework for a Chicago crime data set.
Hao Henry Zhou, Garvesh Raskutti
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2017 When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications
abstract
Many studies in biomedical and health sciences involve small sample sizes due to logistic or financial constraints. Often, identifying weak (but scientifically interesting) associations between a set of predictors and a response necessitates pooling datasets from multiple diverse labs or groups. While there is a rich literature in statistical machine learning to address distributional shifts and inference in multi-site datasets, it is less clear when such pooling is guaranteed to help (and when it does not) – independent of the inference algorithms we use. In this paper, we present a hypothesis test to answer this question, both for classical and high dimensional linear regression. We precisely identify regimes where pooling datasets across multiple sites is sensible, and how such policy decisions can be made via simple checks executable on each site before any data transfer ever happens. With a focus on Alzheimer’s disease studies, we present empirical results showing that in regimes suggested by our analysis, pooling a local dataset with data from an international study improves power.
Hao Henry Zhou, Vamsi K. Ithapu, Sterling C. Johnson, Grace Wahba
ICML1
2016 Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease
abstract
Consider samples from two different data sources $\{\mathbf{x_s^i}\} \sim P_{\rm source}$ and $\{\mathbf{x_t^i}\} \sim P_{\rm target}$. We only observe their transformed versions $h(\mathbf{x_s^i})$ and $g(\mathbf{x_t^i})$, for some known function class $h(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$. Our goal is to perform a statistical test checking if $P_{\rm source}$ = $P_{\rm target}$ while removing the distortions induced by the transformations. This problem is closely related to concepts underlying numerous domain adaptation algorithms, and in our case, is motivated by the need to combine clinical and imaging based biomarkers from multiple sites and/or batches, where this problem is fairly common and an impediment in the conduct of analyses with much larger sample sizes. We develop a framework that addresses this problem using ideas from hypothesis testing on the transformed measurements, where in the distortions need to be estimated {\it in tandem} with the testing. We derive a simple algorithm and study its convergence and consistency properties in detail, and we also provide lower-bound strategies based on recent work in continuous optimization. On a dataset of individuals at risk for neurological disease, our results are competitive with alternative procedures that are twice as expensive and in some cases operationally infeasible to implement.
Hao Henry Zhou, Vamsi K. Ithapu, Sathya N. Ravi, Grace Wahba, Sterling C. Johnson
NIPS1