Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc van Bert
dblp:203/5081
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Automated tuning and configuration of path planning algorithms · ICRA 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
algorithm configuration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Automated tuning and configuration of path planning algorithms · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter tuning · 0.6SMAC · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Automated tuning and configuration of path planning algorithmsabstractA large number of novel path planning methods for a wide range of problems have been described in literature over the past few decades. These algorithms can often be configured using a set of parameters that greatly influence their performance. In a typical use case, these parameters are only very slightly tuned or even left untouched. Systematic approaches to tune parameters of path planning algorithms have been largely unexplored. At the same time, there is a rising interest in the planning and robotics communities regarding the real world application of these theoretically developed and simulation-tested planning algorithms. In this work, we propose the use of Sequential Model-based Algorithm Configuration (SMAC) tools to address these concerns. We show that it is possible to improve the performance of a planning algorithm for a specific problem without the need of in-depth knowledge of the algorithm itself. We compare five planners that see a lot of practical usage on three typical industrial pick-and-place tasks to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method. Ruben Burger, Mukunda Bharatheesha, Marc van Bert, Robert Babuska |
ICRA | 3 |