Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc Hildebrandt
dblp:203/5342
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 19% 3D vision · 14% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | A Framework for On-line Learning of Underwater Vehicles Dynamic Models · ICRA 2019 Experimental evaluation of various machine learning regression methods for model identification of autonomous underwater vehicles · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | A Framework for On-line Learning of Underwater Vehicles Dynamic Models · ICRA 2019 Experimental evaluation of various machine learning regression methods for model identification of autonomous underwater vehicles · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamics learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Framework for On-line Learning of Underwater Vehicles Dynamic Models · ICRA 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
motion model identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Experimental evaluation of various machine learning regression methods for model identification of autonomous underwater vehicles · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
incremental support vector regression · 0.4support vector machine · 0.3kernel ridge regression · 0.3gaussian process regression · 0.3artificial neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | A Framework for On-line Learning of Underwater Vehicles Dynamic ModelsabstractLearning the dynamics of robots from data can help achieve more accurate tracking controllers, or aid their navigation algorithms. However, when the actual dynamics of the robots change due to external conditions, on-line adaptation of their models is required to maintain high fidelity performance. In this work, a framework for on-line learning of robot dynamics is developed to adapt to such changes. The proposed framework employs an incremental support vector regression method to learn the model sequentially from data streams. In combination with the incremental learning, strategies for including and forgetting data are developed to obtain better generalization over the whole state space. The framework is tested in simulation and real experimental scenarios demonstrating its adaptation capabilities to changes in the robot's dynamics. Bilal Wehbe, Marc Hildebrandt, Frank Kirchner |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2017 | Experimental evaluation of various machine learning regression methods for model identification of autonomous underwater vehiclesabstractIn this work we investigate the identification of a motion model for an autonomous underwater vehicle by applying different machine learning (ML) regression methods. By using the data collected from the robot's on-board navigation sensors, we train the regression models to learn the damping term which is regarded as one of the most uncertain components of the motion model. Four regression techniques are investigated namely, artificial neural networks, support vector machines, kernel ridge regression, and Gaussian processes regression. The performance of the identified models is tested through real experimental scenarios performed with the AUV Leng. The novelty of this work is the identification of an underwater vehicle's motion model, for the first time, through machine learning methods by using the robot's onboard sensory data. Results show that the damping model learned with nonlinear methods yield better estimates than the simplified linear and quadratic model which is identified with least-squares technique. Bilal Wehbe, Marc Hildebrandt, Frank Kirchner |
ICRA | 2 |