VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edward C. Williams
dblp:203/8111
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 46% Reinforcement learning · 23% Language models and text generation · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
combinatory categorial grammar parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Parse Natural Language to Grounded Reward Functions with Weak Supervision · ICRA 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Parse Natural Language to Grounded Reward Functions with Weak Supervision · ICRA 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Parse Natural Language to Grounded Reward Functions with Weak Supervision · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot programming
task specification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Parse Natural Language to Grounded Reward Functions with Weak Supervision · ICRA 2018 |
Energy systems and smart grids › energy harvesting
solar energy harvesting |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
Energy systems and smart grids › renewable energy › solar energy
solar tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bandit algorithms · 0.7weak supervision · 0.3perceptron training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel ControlabstractSolar panels sustainably harvest energy from the sun. To improve performance, panels are often equipped with a tracking mechanism that computes the sun’s position in the sky throughout the day. Based on the tracker’s estimate of the sun’s location, a controller orients the panel to minimize the angle of incidence between solar radiant energy and the photovoltaic cells on the surface of the panel, increasing total energy harvested. Prior work has developed efficient tracking algorithms that accurately compute the sun’s location to facilitate solar tracking and control. However, always pointing a panel directly at the sun does not account for diffuse irradiance in the sky, reflected irradiance from the ground and surrounding surfaces, power required to reorient the panel, shading effects from neighboring panels and foliage, or changing weather conditions (such as clouds), all of which are contributing factors to the total energy harvested by a fleet of solar panels. In this work, we show that a bandit-based approach can increase the total energy harvested by solar panels by learning to dynamically account for such other factors. Our contribution is threefold: (1) the development of a test bed based on typical solar and irradiance models for experimenting with solar panel control using a variety of learning methods, (2) simulated validation that bandit algorithms can effectively learn to control solar panels, and (3) the design and construction of an intelligent solar panel prototype that learns to angle itself using bandit algorithms. David Abel, Edward C. Williams, Stephen Brawner, Emily Reif, Michael L. Littman |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Learning to Parse Natural Language to Grounded Reward Functions with Weak SupervisionabstractIn order to intuitively and efficiently collaborate with humans, robots must learn to complete tasks specified using natural language. We represent natural language instructions as goal-state reward functions specified using lambda calculus. Using reward functions as language representations allows robots to plan efficiently in stochastic environments. To map sentences to such reward functions, we learn a weighted linear Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) semantic parser. The parser, including both parameters and the CCG lexicon, is learned from a validation procedure that does not require execution of a planner, annotating reward functions, or labeling parse trees, unlike prior approaches. To learn a CCG lexicon and parse weights, we use coarse lexical generation and validation-driven perceptron weight updates using the approach of Artzi and Zettlemoyer [4]. We present results on the Cleanup World domain [18] to demonstrate the potential of our approach. We report an F1 score of 0.82 on a collected corpus of 23 tasks containing combinations of nested referential expressions, comparators and object properties with 2037 corresponding sentences. Our goal-condition learning approach enables an improvement of orders of magnitude in computation time over a baseline that performs planning during learning, while achieving comparable results. Further, we conduct an experiment with just 6 labeled demonstrations to show the ease of teaching a robot behaviors using our method. We show that parsing models learned from small data sets can generalize to commands not seen during training. Edward C. Williams, Nakul Gopalan, Mina Rhee, Stefanie Tellex |
ICRA | 1 |