VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erik Bodin
dblp:203/8290
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 39% Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Optimization for machine learning · 19% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space manipulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Black-box density function estimation using recursive partitioning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
latent representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
low-dimensional embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
continuous normalizing flow · 0.9recursive partitioning · 0.5noise modeling · 0.4latent gaussian process · 0.4gaussian process · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyondabstractSampling from generative models has become a crucial tool for applications like data synthesis and augmentation. Diffusion, Flow Matching and Continuous Normalising Flows have shown effectiveness across various modalities, and rely on latent variables for generation. For experimental design or creative applications that require more control over the generation process, it has become common to manipulate the latent variable directly. However, existing approaches for performing such manipulations (e.g. interpolation or forming low-dimensional representations) only work well in special cases or are network or data-modality specific.
We propose Latent Optimal Linear combinations (LOL) as a general-purpose method to form linear combinations of latent variables that adhere to the assumptions of the generative model. As LOL is easy to implement and naturally addresses the broader task of forming any linear combinations, e.g. the construction of subspaces of the latent space, LOL dramatically simplifies the creation of expressive low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional objects. Erik Bodin, Alexandru I. Stere, Dragos D. Margineantu, Carl Henrik Ek, Henry Moss |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Black-box density function estimation using recursive partitioningabstractWe present a novel approach to Bayesian inference and general Bayesian computation that is defined through a sequential decision loop. Our method defines a recursive partitioning of the sample space. It neither relies on gradients nor requires any problem-specific tuning, and is asymptotically exact for any density function with a bounded domain. The output is an approximation to the whole density function including the normalisation constant, via partitions organised in efficient data structures. Such approximations may be used for evidence estimation or fast posterior sampling, but also as building blocks to treat a larger class of estimation problems. The algorithm shows competitive performance to recent state-of-the-art methods on synthetic and real-world problems including parameter inference for gravitational-wave physics. Erik Bodin, Zhenwen Dai, Neill W. Campbell, Carl Henrik Ek |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian OptimizationabstractBayesian optimization (BO) methods often rely on the assumption that the objective function is well-behaved, but in practice, this is seldom true for real-world objectives even if noise-free observations can be collected. Common approaches, which try to model the objective as precisely as possible, often fail to make progress by spending too many evaluations modeling irrelevant details. We address this issue by proposing surrogate models that focus on the well-behaved structure in the objective function, which is informative for search, while ignoring detrimental structure that is challenging to model from few observations. First, we demonstrate that surrogate models with appropriate noise distributions can absorb challenging structures in the objective function by treating them as irreducible uncertainty. Secondly, we show that a latent Gaussian process is an excellent surrogate for this purpose, comparing with Gaussian processes with standard noise distributions. We perform numerous experiments on a range of BO benchmarks and find that our approach improves reliability and performance when faced with challenging objective functions. Erik Bodin, Markus Kaiser 0001, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Zhenwen Dai, Neill W. Campbell, Carl Henrik Ek |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Compositional uncertainty in deep Gaussian processesabstractGaussian processes (GPs) are nonparametric priors over functions. Fitting a GP implies computing a posterior distribution of functions consistent with the observed data. Similarly, deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) should allow us to compute a posterior distribution of compositions of multiple functions giving rise to the observations. However, exact Bayesian inference is intractable for DGPs, motivating the use of various approximations. We show that the application of simplifying mean-field assumptions across the hierarchy leads to the layers of a DGP collapsing to near-deterministic transformations. We argue that such an inference scheme is suboptimal, not taking advantage of the potential of the model to discover the compositional structure in the data. To address this issue, we examine alternative variational inference schemes allowing for dependencies across different layers and discuss their advantages and limitations. Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Markus Kaiser 0001, Erik Bodin, Neill D. F. Campbell, Carl Henrik Ek |
UAI | 4 |
| 2018 | Gaussian Process Deep Belief Networks: A Smooth Generative Model of Shape with Uncertainty Propagation
Alessandro Di Martino, Erik Bodin, Carl Henrik Ek, Neill D. F. Campbell |
ACCV (4) | 2 |