Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jocelyn Meyron

dblp:203/8736 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Computational fabrication · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
discrete optimal transport
0.412019
Initialization Procedures for Discrete and Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.412019
Initialization Procedures for Discrete and Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · Comput. Aided Des. 2019
Computational fabrication › appearance fabrication
caustic design
0.312018
Light in power: a general and parameter-free algorithm for caustic design · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Geometric modeling and processing
mesh processing
0.312018
Light in power: a general and parameter-free algorithm for caustic design · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Geometric modeling and processing › spatial data structures › voronoi diagram
power diagram
0.312018
Light in power: a general and parameter-free algorithm for caustic design · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
semi-discrete optimal transport
0.112019
Initialization Procedures for Discrete and Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport · Comput. Aided Des. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power diagram intersection · 0.3optimal transport · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Initialization Procedures for Discrete and Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport
Jocelyn Meyron
Comput. Aided Des.1
2018 An Algorithm for Optimal Transport between a Simplex Soup and a Point Cloud
abstract
We propose a numerical method to find the optimal transport map between a measure supported on a lower-dimensional subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$ and a finitely supported measure. More precisely, the source measure is assumed to be supported on a simplex soup, i.e., on a union of simplices of arbitrary dimension between 2 and $d$. As in [F. Aurenhammer, F. Hoffman, and B. Aronov, Algorithmica, 20 (1998), pp. 61--76] we recast this optimal transport problem as the resolution of a nonlinear system where one wants to prescribe the quantity of mass in each cell of the so-called Laguerre diagram. We prove the convergence with linear speed of a damped Newton's algorithm to solve this nonlinear system. The convergence relies on two conditions: (i) a genericity condition on the point cloud with respect to the simplex soup, and (ii) a (strong) connectedness condition on the support of the source measure defined on the simplex soup. Finally, we apply our algorithm in ${R}^3$ to compute optimal transport plans between a measure supported on a triangulation and a discrete measure. We also detail some applications such as optimal quantization of a probability density over a surface, remeshing, or rigid point set registration on a mesh.
Quentin Mérigot, Jocelyn Meyron, Boris Thibert
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2
2018 Light in power: a general and parameter-free algorithm for caustic design
abstract
We present in this paper a generic and parameter-free algorithm to efficiently build a wide variety of optical components, such as mirrors or lenses, that satisfy some light energy constraints. In all of our problems, one is given a collimated or point light source and a desired illumination after reflection or refraction and the goal is to design the geometry of a mirror or lens which transports exactly the light emitted by the source onto the target. We first propose a general framework and show that eight different optical component design problems amount to solving a light energy conservation equation that involves the computation of visibility diagrams. We then show that these diagrams all have the same structure and can be obtained by intersecting a 3D Power diagram with a planar or spherical domain. This allows us to propose an efficient and fully generic algorithm capable to solve these eight optical component design problems. The support of the prescribed target illumination can be a set of directions or a set of points located at a finite distance. Our solutions satisfy design constraints such as convexity or concavity. We show the effectiveness of our algorithm on simulated and fabricated examples.
Jocelyn Meyron, Quentin Mérigot, Boris Thibert
ACM Trans. Graph.1