Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arslan Chaudhry

dblp:203/8835 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Learning paradigms · 78% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 10%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning
2.552023
Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically · ICML 2022
Using Hindsight to Anchor Past Knowledge in Continual Learning · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation
0.922021
Using Hindsight to Anchor Past Knowledge in Continual Learning · AAAI 2021
Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspaces · NeurIPS 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › belief revision
forgetting
0.712023
Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer? · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › lifelong learning
forward transfer
0.712023
Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer? · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.712023
Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting
0.522022
Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence · ECCV (11) 2018
Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning
0.412019
Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEM · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
incremental learning
0.312018
Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence · ECCV (11) 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization
0.112021
Using Hindsight to Anchor Past Knowledge in Continual Learning · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experience replay · 0.9supervised learning · 0.7AutoML · 0.7lazy training regime · 0.6gradient orthogonality analysis · 0.6gradient-based optimization · 0.5bi-level optimization · 0.5stiefel manifold optimization · 0.4isometric mapping · 0.4episodic memory · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer?
Jiefeng Chen 0001, Timothy Nguyen, Dilan Görür, Arslan Chaudhry
ICLR4
2023 Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research
abstract
A shared goal of several machine learning communities like continual learning, meta-learning and transfer learning, is to design algorithms and models that efficiently and robustly adapt to unseen tasks. An even more ambitious goal is to build models that never stop adapting, and that become increasingly more efficient through time by suitably transferring the accrued knowledge. Beyond the study of the actual learning algorithm and model architecture, there are several hurdles towards our quest to build such models, such as the choice of learning protocol, metric of success and data needed to validate research hypotheses. In this work, we introduce the Never-Ending VIsual-classification Stream (NEVIS'22), a benchmark consisting of a stream of over 100 visual classification tasks, sorted chronologically and extracted from papers sampled uniformly from computer vision proceedings spanning the last three decades. The resulting stream reflects what the research community thought was meaningful at any point in time, and it serves as an ideal test bed to assess how well models can adapt to new tasks, and do so better and more efficiently as time goes by. Despite being limited to classification, the resulting stream has a rich diversity of tasks from OCR, to texture analysis, scene recognition, and so forth. The diversity is also reflected in the wide range of dataset sizes, spanning over four orders of magnitude. Overall, NEVIS'22 poses an unprecedented challenge for current sequential learning approaches due to the scale and diversity of tasks, yet with a low entry barrier as it is limited to a single modality and well understood supervised learning problems. Moreover, we provide a reference implementation including strong baselines and an evaluation protocol to compare methods in terms of their trade-off between accuracy and compute. We hope that NEVIS'22 can be useful to researchers working on continual learning, meta-learning, AutoML and more generally sequential learning, and help these communities join forces towards more robust models that efficiently adapt to a never ending stream of data.
Jörg Bornschein, Alexandre Galashov, Ross Hemsley, Amal Rannen Triki, Yutian Chen 0001, Arslan Chaudhry, Xu Owen He, Arthur Douillard, Massimo Caccia, Qixuan Feng, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Kitty Stacpoole, Diego de Las Casas, Will Hawkins, Angeliki Lazaridou, Yee Whye Teh, Andrei A. Rusu, Razvan Pascanu, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato
J. Mach. Learn. Res.6
2022 Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically
abstract
A primary focus area in continual learning research is alleviating the "catastrophic forgetting" problem in neural networks by designing new algorithms that are more robust to the distribution shifts. While the recent progress in continual learning literature is encouraging, our understanding of what properties of neural networks contribute to catastrophic forgetting is still limited. To address this, instead of focusing on continual learning algorithms, in this work, we focus on the model itself and study the impact of "width" of the neural network architecture on catastrophic forgetting, and show that width has a surprisingly significant effect on forgetting. To explain this effect, we study the learning dynamics of the network from various perspectives such as gradient orthogonality, sparsity, and lazy training regime. We provide potential explanations that are consistent with the empirical results across different architectures and continual learning benchmarks.
Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Arslan Chaudhry, Huiyi Hu, Razvan Pascanu, Dilan Görür, Mehrdad Farajtabar
ICML2
2021 Using Hindsight to Anchor Past Knowledge in Continual Learning
abstract
In continual learning, the learner faces a stream of data whose distribution changes over time. Modern neural networks are known to suffer under this setting, as they quickly forget previously acquired knowledge. To address such catastrophic forgetting, many continual learning methods implement different types of experience replay, re-learning on past data stored in a small buffer known as episodic memory. In this work, we complement experience replay with a new objective that we call ``anchoring'', where the learner uses bilevel optimization to update its knowledge on the current task, while keeping intact the predictions on some anchor points of past tasks. These anchor points are learned using gradient-based optimization to maximize forgetting, which is approximated by fine-tuning the currently trained model on the episodic memory of past tasks. Experiments on several supervised learning benchmarks for continual learning demonstrate that our approach improves the standard experience replay in terms of both accuracy and forgetting metrics and for various sizes of episodic memory.
Arslan Chaudhry, Albert Gordo, Puneet K. Dokania, Philip Torr 0001, David Lopez-Paz
AAAI1
2020 Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspaces
abstract
In continual learning (CL), a learner is faced with a sequence of tasks, arriving one after the other, and the goal is to remember all the tasks once the continual learning experience is finished. The prior art in CL uses episodic memory, parameter regularization or extensible network structures to reduce interference among tasks, but in the end, all the approaches learn different tasks in a joint vector space. We believe this invariably leads to interference among different tasks. We propose to learn tasks in different (low-rank) vector subspaces that are kept orthogonal to each other in order to minimize interference. Further, to keep the gradients of different tasks coming from these subspaces orthogonal to each other, we learn isometric mappings by posing network training as an optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold. To the best of our understanding, we report, for the first time, strong results over experience-replay baseline with and without memory on standard classification benchmarks in continual learning.
Arslan Chaudhry, Naeemullah Khan, Puneet K. Dokania, Philip Torr 0001
NeurIPS1
2019 Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEM
Arslan Chaudhry, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Marcus Rohrbach, Mohamed Elhoseiny 0001
ICLR (Poster)1
2018 Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigence
Arslan Chaudhry, Puneet K. Dokania, Thalaiyasingam Ajanthan, Philip Torr 0001
ECCV (11)1
2017 Discovering Class-Specific Pixels for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation
Arslan Chaudhry, Puneet K. Dokania, Philip Torr 0001
BMVC1