Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Bunk
dblp:203/9153
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
manipulation localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image Regions · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image forensics
tampered region detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image Regions · ICCV 2017 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics
image forensics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image Regions · ICCV 2017 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics › image forensics
image forgery detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image Regions · ICCV 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
end-to-end training · 0.6backpropagation · 0.6CNN-LSTM · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Exploiting Spatial Structure for Localizing Manipulated Image RegionsabstractThe advent of high-tech journaling tools facilitates an image to be manipulated in a way that can easily evade state-of-the-art image tampering detection approaches. The recent success of the deep learning approaches in different recognition tasks inspires us to develop a high confidence detection framework which can localize manipulated regions in an image. Unlike semantic object segmentation where all meaningful regions (objects) are segmented, the localization of image manipulation focuses only the possible tampered region which makes the problem even more challenging. In order to formulate the framework, we employ a hybrid CNN-LSTM model to capture discriminative features between manipulated and non-manipulated regions. One of the key properties of manipulated regions is that they exhibit discriminative features in boundaries shared with neighboring non-manipulated pixels. Our motivation is to learn the boundary discrepancy, i.e., the spatial structure, between manipulated and non-manipulated regions with the combination of LSTM and convolution layers. We perform end-to-end training of the network to learn the parameters through back-propagation given ground-truth mask information. The overall framework is capable of detecting different types of image manipulations, including copy-move, removal and splicing. Our model shows promising results in localizing manipulated regions, which is demonstrated through rigorous experimentation on three diverse datasets. Jawadul H. Bappy, Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury, Jason Bunk, Lakshmanan Nataraj, B. S. Manjunath |
ICCV | 3 |