Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Hopkins

dblp:203/9711 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
ideology detection
0.312017
Beyond Binary Labels: Political Ideology Prediction of Twitter Users · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
user profiling
0.312017
Beyond Binary Labels: Political Ideology Prediction of Twitter Users · ACL (1) 2017
Computational social science and digital humanities
social media analysis
0.112017
Beyond Binary Labels: Political Ideology Prediction of Twitter Users · ACL (1) 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey-labeled data · 0.6supervised classification · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Beyond Binary Labels: Political Ideology Prediction of Twitter Users
abstract
Automatic political preference prediction from social media posts has to date proven successful only in distinguishing between publicly declared liberals and conservatives in the US.This study examines users' political ideology using a sevenpoint scale which enables us to identify politically moderate and neutral usersgroups which are of particular interest to political scientists and pollsters.Using a novel data set with political ideology labels self-reported through surveys, our goal is two-fold: a) to characterize the political groups of users through language use on Twitter; b) to build a fine-grained model that predicts political ideology of unseen users.Our results identify differences in both political leaning and engagement and the extent to which each group tweets using political keywords.Finally, we demonstrate how to improve ideology prediction accuracy by exploiting the relationships between the user groups.
Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Ye Liu 0002, Daniel Hopkins, Lyle H. Ungar
ACL (1)3