Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naheed Anjum Arafat

dblp:204/2502 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8788-6195ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Language models and text generation · 23% Graph learning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 50% Database theory · 25% Data mining · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.912025
Logical Consistency of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
graph neural network robustness
0.912025
When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
logical consistency
0.912025
Logical Consistency of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics
0.812024
Finite Volume Features, Global Geometry Representations, and Residual Training for Deep Learning-based CFD Simulation · ICML 2024
Graph data management
cohesive subgraph mining
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Graph data management › cohesive subgraph mining
core decomposition
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Database theory
hypergraph decomposition
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Data mining
pattern mining
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312025
Logical Consistency of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking · ICLR 2025
Computational geometry
computational topology
0.312025
When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning · AAAI 2025
Computational geometry › topological data analysis
persistent homology
0.312025
When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

witness complex · 1.7topological loss regularization · 1.7residual training · 1.5graph neural network · 1.5finite volume method · 1.5supervised fine-tuning · 0.9propositional logic · 0.9peeling algorithm · 0.7parallel implementation · 0.7local algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 When Witnesses Defend: A Witness Graph Topological Layer for Adversarial Graph Learning
abstract
Capitalizing on the intuitive premise that shape characteristics are more robust to perturbations, we bridge adversarial graph learning with the emerging tools from computational topology, namely, persistent homology representations of graphs. We introduce the concept of witness complex to adversarial analysis on graphs, which allows us to focus only on the salient shape characteristics of graphs, yielded by the subset of the most essential nodes (i.e., landmarks), with minimal loss of topological information on the whole graph. The remaining nodes are then used as witnesses, governing which higher-order graph substructures are incorporated into the learning process. Armed with the witness mechanism, we design Witness Graph Topological Layer (WGTL), which systematically integrates both local and global topological graph feature representations, the impact of which is, in turn, automatically controlled by the robust regularized topological loss. Given the attacker's budget, we derive the important stability guarantees of both local and global topology encodings and the associated robust topological loss. We illustrate the versatility and efficiency of WGTL by its integration with five GNNs and three existing non-topological defense mechanisms. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that WGTL boosts the robustness of GNNs across a range of perturbations and against a range of adversarial attacks.
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Debabrota Basu, Yulia R. Gel
AAAI1
2025 Logical Consistency of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking
abstract
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant success in performing varied natural language tasks such as language translation, question-answering, summarizing, fact-checking, etc. Despite LLMs’ impressive ability to generate human-like texts, LLMs are infamous for their inconsistent responses – a meaning-preserving change in the input query results in an inconsistent response and attributes to vulnerabilities of LLMs such as hallucination. Consequently, existing research focuses on simple paraphrasing-based consistency assessment of LLMs, and ignores complex queries that necessitate an even better understanding of logical reasoning by an LLM. *Our work therefore addresses the logical inconsistency of LLMs under complex logical queries with primitive logical operators, e.g., negation, conjunction, and disjunction.* As a test bed, we consider retrieval-augmented LLMs on a fact-checking task involving propositional logic queries from knowledge graphs (KGs). Our contributions are three-fold. **Benchmark:** We introduce three logical fact-checking datasets over KGs for community development towards logically consistent LLMs. **Assessment:** We propose consistency measures of LLMs on propositional logic queries and demonstrate that existing LLMs lack logical consistency, especially on complex queries. **Improvement:** We employ supervised fine-tuning to improve the logical consistency of LLMs on the complex fact-checking task with KG contexts. We have made our source code and benchmarks available.
Bishwamittra Ghosh, Sarah Hasan, Naheed Anjum Arafat, Arijit Khan 0001
ICLR3
2024 Estimate and Reduce Uncertainty in Uncertain Graphs
abstract
Computing basic network properties and machine learning (ML) model outputs, e.g., reachability, shortest path distance, triangle count, node classification, etc., are key to understand large and complex graphs. We study two fundamental problems: (1) Given a graph with uncertain edges and a real-valued network property or an ML model, estimate the uncertainty associated with evaluating the property or the ML model's output over the uncertain graph. (2) Given a limited budget on the number of edges, find the$k-\mathbf{best}$edges whose probability update will reduce the aforementioned uncertainty maximally. We formulate both problems using the information-theoretic notion of entropy and then characterize the hardness of our problems. We next devise approximate solutions with theoretical soundness and greedy subgraph selection-based efficient algorithms. Our empirical evaluation and case study with real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that the proposed solutions are more effective and efficient than baselines and are several orders of magnitude faster than exact approaches.
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Ehsan Bonabi Mobaraki, Arijit Khan 0001, Yllka Velaj, Francesco Bonchi
DSAA1
2024 Finite Volume Features, Global Geometry Representations, and Residual Training for Deep Learning-based CFD Simulation
abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation is an irreplaceable modelling step in many engineering designs, but it is often computationally expensive. Some graph neural network (GNN)-based CFD methods have been proposed. However, the current methods inherit the weakness of traditional numerical simulators, as well as ignore the cell characteristics in the mesh used in the finite volume method, a common method in practical CFD applications. Specifically, the input nodes in these GNN methods have very limited information about any object immersed in the simulation domain and its surrounding environment. Also, the cell characteristics of the mesh such as cell volume, face surface area, and face centroid are not included in the message-passing operations in the GNN methods. To address these weaknesses, this work proposes two novel geometric representations: Shortest Vector (SV) and Directional Integrated Distance (DID). Extracted from the mesh, the SV and DID provide global geometry perspective to each input node, thus removing the need to collect this information through message-passing. This work also introduces the use of Finite Volume Features (FVF) in the graph convolutions as node and edge attributes, enabling its message-passing operations to adjust to different nodes. Finally, this work is the first to demonstrate how residual training, with the availability of low-resolution data, can be adopted to improve the flow field prediction accuracy. Experimental results on two datasets with five different state-of-the-art GNN methods for CFD indicate that SV, DID, FVF and residual training can effectively reduce the predictive error of current GNN-based methods by as much as 41%. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/toggled/FvFGeo.
Loh Sher En Jessica, Naheed Anjum Arafat, Wei Xian Lim, Wai Lee Chan, Adams Wai-Kin Kong
ICML2
2023 Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition
abstract
We propose neighborhood-based core decomposition : a novel way of decomposing hypergraphs into hierarchical neighborhood-cohesive subhypergraphs. Alternative approaches to decomposing hypergraphs, e.g., reduction to clique or bipartite graphs, are not meaningful in certain applications, the later also results in inefficient decomposition; while existing degree-based hypergraph decomposition does not distinguish nodes with different neighborhood sizes. Our case studies show that the proposed decomposition is more effective than degree and clique graph-based decompositions in disease intervention and in extracting provably approximate and application-wise meaningful densest subhypergraphs. We propose three algorithms: Peel, its efficient variant E-Peel, and a novel local algorithm: Local-core with parallel implementation. Our most efficient parallel algorithm Local-core(P) decomposes hypergraph with 27M nodes and 17M hyperedges in-memory within 91 seconds by adopting various optimizations. Finally, we develop a new hypergraph-core model, the (neighborhood, degree)-core by considering both neighborhood and degree constraints, design its decomposition algorithm Local-core+Peel, and demonstrate its superiority in spreading diffusion.
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Arijit Khan 0001, Arpit Kumar Rai, Bishwamittra Ghosh
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2020 Construction and Random Generation of Hypergraphs with Prescribed Degree and Dimension Sequences
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Debabrota Basu, Laurent Decreusefond, Stéphane Bressan
DEXA (2)1
2019 Topological Data Analysis with \epsilon ϵ -net Induced Lazy Witness Complex
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Debabrota Basu, Stéphane Bressan
DEXA (2)1
2017 Hypergraph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Stéphane Bressan
DEXA (2)1