Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noah Hollmann
dblp:204/2755
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 50% Data mining · 50% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
prior-data fitted networks |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.7 | 3 | 2025 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
causal fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › causal fairness
counterfactual fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
tabular foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairness · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning and data management
automated machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining
feature engineering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
in-context learning · 2.4bayesian inference · 1.3large language model · 1.3transformer · 1.2prior-data fitted networks · 0.9pre-training on synthetic data · 0.9structural causal model · 0.8prior-fitted network · 0.7neural processes · 0.7gaussian process · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal FairnessabstractMachine learning (ML) systems are utilized in critical sectors such as healthcare, law enforcement, and finance, but often rely on historical data that contains demographic biases, leading to decisions that perpetuate or intensify existing inequalities. Causal and counterfactual fairness provide a transparent, human-in-the-loop framework to mitigate algorithmic discrimination, aligning closely with legal doctrines of direct and indirect discrimination. However, current causal fairness frameworks hold a key limitation in that they assume prior knowledge of the correct causal model, restricting their applicability in complex fairness scenarios where causal models are unknown or difficult to identify. To bridge this gap, we propose FairPFN, a tabular foundation model pre-trained on synthetic causal fairness data to identify and mitigate the causal effects of protected attributes in its predictions. FairPFN’s key contribution is that it requires no knowledge of the causal model and demonstrates strong performance across a diverse set of hand-crafted and real-world causal scenarios relative to robust baseline methods. FairPFN paves the way for a promising direction for future research, making causal fairness more accessible to a wider variety of complex fairness problems. Jake Robertson, Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Noor H. Awad, Frank Hutter |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect EstimationabstractCausal effect estimation is critical to a range of scientific disciplines. Existing methods for this task either require interventional data, knowledge about the ground-truth causal graph, or rely on assumptions such as unconfoundedness, restricting their applicability in real-world settings. In the domain of tabular machine learning, Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) have achieved state-of-the-art predictive performance, having been pre-trained on synthetic causal data to solve tabular prediction problems via in-context learning. To assess whether this can be transferred to the problem of causal effect estimation, we pre-train PFNs on synthetic data drawn from a wide variety of causal structures, including interventions, to predict interventional outcomes given observational data. Through extensive experiments in synthetic and semi-synthetic settings, we show that our approach allows for the accurate estimation of causal effects without knowledge of the underlying causal graph. Jake Robertson, Arik Reuter, Siyuan Guo 0003, Noah Hollmann, Frank Hutter, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Drift-Resilient TabPFN: In-Context Learning Temporal Distribution Shifts on Tabular DataabstractWhile most ML models expect independent and identically distributed data, this assumption is often violated in real-world scenarios due to distribution shifts, resulting in the degradation of machine learning model performance. Until now, no tabular method has consistently outperformed classical supervised learning, which ignores these shifts. To address temporal distribution shifts, we present Drift-Resilient TabPFN, a fresh approach based on In-Context Learning with a Prior-Data Fitted Network that learns the learning algorithm itself: it accepts the entire training dataset as input and makes predictions on the test set in a single forward pass. Specifically, it learns to approximate Bayesian inference on synthetic datasets drawn from a prior that specifies the model's inductive bias. This prior is based on structural causal models (SCM), which gradually shift over time. To model shifts of these causal models, we use a secondary SCM, that specifies changes in the primary model parameters. The resulting Drift-Resilient TabPFN can be applied to unseen data, runs in seconds on small to moderately sized datasets and needs no hyperparameter tuning. Comprehensive evaluations across 18 synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate large performance improvements over a wide range of baselines, such as XGB, CatBoost, TabPFN, and applicable methods featured in the Wild-Time benchmark. Compared to the strongest baselines, it improves accuracy from 0.688 to 0.744 and ROC AUC from 0.786 to 0.832 while maintaining stronger calibration. This approach could serve as significant groundwork for further research on out-of-distribution prediction. Kai Helli, David Schnurr, Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second
Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Katharina Eggensperger, Frank Hutter |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian OptimizationabstractIn this paper, we use Prior-data Fitted Networks (PFNs) as a flexible surrogate for Bayesian Optimization (BO). PFNs are neural processes that are trained to approximate the posterior predictive distribution (PPD) through in-context learning on any prior distribution that can be efficiently sampled from. We describe how this flexibility can be exploited for surrogate modeling in BO. We use PFNs to mimic a naive Gaussian process (GP), an advanced GP, and a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN). In addition, we show how to incorporate further information into the prior, such as allowing hints about the position of optima (user priors), ignoring irrelevant dimensions, and performing non-myopic BO by learning the acquisition function. The flexibility underlying these extensions opens up vast possibilities for using PFNs for BO. We demonstrate the usefulness of PFNs for BO in a large-scale evaluation on artificial GP samples and three different hyperparameter optimization testbeds: HPO-B, Bayesmark, and PD1. We publish code alongside trained models at https://github.com/automl/PFNs4BO. Samuel Müller 0005, Matthias Feurer 0001, Noah Hollmann, Frank Hutter |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature EngineeringabstractAs the field of automated machine learning (AutoML) advances, it becomes increasingly important to incorporate domain knowledge into these systems.
We present an approach for doing so by harnessing the power of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we introduce Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineering (CAAFE), a feature engineering method for tabular datasets that utilizes an LLM to iteratively generate additional semantically meaningful features for tabular datasets based on the description of the dataset. The method produces both Python code for creating new features and explanations for the utility of the generated features.
Despite being methodologically simple, CAAFE improves performance on 11 out of 14 datasets -- boosting mean ROC AUC performance from 0.798 to 0.822 across all dataset - similar to the improvement achieved by using a random forest instead of logistic regression on our datasets. Furthermore, CAAFE is interpretable by providing a textual explanation for each generated feature.
CAAFE paves the way for more extensive semi-automation in data science tasks and emphasizes the significance of context-aware solutions that can extend the scope of AutoML systems to semantic AutoML. We release our [code](url{https://github.com/automl/CAAFE), a simple [demo](url{https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1mCA8xOAJZ4MaB_alZvyARTMjhl6RZf0a) and a [python package](url{https://pypi.org/project/caafe/). Noah Hollmann, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference
Samuel Müller 0005, Noah Hollmann, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif Grabocka, Frank Hutter |
ICLR | 2 |