How could AI enter a deeply value-laden realm of human lives? Drawing on key values and practices associated with praying identified through a diary study, we presented our participants with four speculative, conceptual value-sensitive AI systems to “assist” prayer practices. The conceptual designs served as provocations to co-reflect on how AI interventions might shape their praying experiences. Our findings suggest that a sense of authenticity (or a genuine connection to the divine) is a crucial value, while the mere presence of AI was often perceived as diminishing this authenticity, particularly when AI assumed too much agency in guiding prayer practices. Based on our findings, we argue for the importance of AI agent designs that recognize users’ agency in shaping their interaction with AI. We further explore how this may be possible by leveraging interpretive openness, perhaps through AI’s inexplicability as a resource for personal meaning-making, and by recognizing non-use of AI as a legitimate design choice.

At a time when diverse forms of automated visual feedback systems on speech are introduced to the Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) community, our research investigates the possible design spaces and design implications to consider when creating them. We utilised a Wizard of Oz prototype that recognises fillers during speech and sends out real-time feedback in the form of a flickering screen and a post-report with graphic charts. We let 27 participants use this prototype and interviewed them about their general experience of using such systems. Based on thematic analysis, we propose eight design implications to consider when designing an automated visual feedback system on speech. Additionally, we discuss the possible future for automated visual feedback systems on speech where they collaborate with fields such as personal informatics (quantified self), self-determination theory (SDT) and motivation, and other socio-ethnic areas