Quantifying uncertainty is an essential part of predictive modeling, especially in the context of high-stakes decision-making. While classification output includes data uncertainty by design in the form of class probabilities, the regression task generally aims only to predict the expected value of the target variable. Probabilistic extensions often assume parametric distributions around the expected value, optimizing the likelihood over the resulting explicit densities. However, using parametric distributions can limit practical applicability, making it difficult for models to capture skewed, multi-modal, or otherwise complex distributions. In this paper, we propose optimizing a novel nondeterministic neural network regression architecture for loss functions derived from a sample-based approximation of the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS), enabling a truly distribution-free approach by learning to sample from the target's aleatoric distribution, rather than predicting explicit densities. Our approach allows the model to learn well-calibrated, arbitrary uni- and multivariate output distributions. We evaluate the method on a variety of synthetic and real-world tasks, including uni- and multivariate problems, function inverse approximation, and standard regression uncertainty benchmarks. Finally, we make all experiment code publicly available.

In this work, we examine Asymmetric Shapley Values (ASV), a variant of the popular SHAP additive local explanation method. ASV proposes a way to improve model explanations incorporating known causal relations between variables, and is also considered as a way to test for unfair discrimination in model predictions. Unexplored in previous literature, relaxing symmetry in Shapley values can have counter-intuitive consequences for model explanation. To better understand the method, we first show how local contributions correspond to global contributions of variance reduction. Using variance, we demonstrate multiple cases where ASV yields counter-intuitive attributions, arguably producing incorrect results for root-cause analysis. Second, we identify generalized additive models (GAM) as a restricted class for which ASV exhibits desirable properties. We support our arguments by proving multiple theoretical results about the method. Finally, we demonstrate the use of asymmetric attributions on multiple real-world datasets, comparing the results with and without restricted model families using gradient boosting and deep learning models.

Recommender systems have to serve in online environments that can be non-stationary. Traditional recommender algorithms may periodically rebuild their models, but they cannot adjust to quick changes in trends caused by timely information. In contrast, online learning models can adopt to temporal effects, hence they may overcome the effect of concept drift.