Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Zenkel

dblp:205/2479 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-2060-156XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Machine translation · 43%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering
0.812024
Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clustering · ICLR 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience
0.812024
Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clustering · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.412020
End-to-End Neural Word Alignment Outperforms GIZA++ · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.112020
End-to-End Neural Word Alignment Outperforms GIZA++ · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stimulus optimization · 1.5expectation-maximization · 1.5transformer · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clustering
abstract
Identifying cell types and understanding their functional properties is crucial for unraveling the mechanisms underlying perception and cognition. In the retina, functional types can be identified by carefully selected stimuli, but this requires expert domain knowledge and biases the procedure towards previously known cell types. In the visual cortex, it is still unknown what functional types exist and how to identify them. Thus, for unbiased identification of the functional cell types in retina and visual cortex, new approaches are needed. Here we propose an optimization-based clustering approach using deep predictive models to obtain functional clusters of neurons using Most Discriminative Stimuli (MDS). Our approach alternates between stimulus optimization with cluster reassignment akin to an expectation-maximization algorithm. The algorithm recovers functional clusters in mouse retina, marmoset retina and macaque visual area V4. This demonstrates that our approach can successfully find discriminative stimuli across species, stages of the visual system and recording techniques. The resulting most discriminative stimuli can be used to assign functional cell types fast and on the fly, without the need to train complex predictive models or show a large natural scene dataset, paving the way for experiments that were previously limited by experimental time. Crucially, MDS are interpretable: they visualize the distinctive stimulus patterns that most unambiguously identify a specific type of neuron.
Max F. Burg, Thomas Zenkel, Michaela Vystrcilová, Jonathan Oesterle, Larissa Höfling, Konstantin Willeke, Jan Lause, Sarah Müller, Paul G. Fahey, Zhiwei Ding, Kelli Restivo, Shashwat Sridhar, Tim Gollisch, Philipp Berens, Andreas S. Tolias, Thomas Euler, Matthias Bethge, Alexander S. Ecker
ICLR2
2020 End-to-End Neural Word Alignment Outperforms GIZA++
abstract
Word alignment was once a core unsupervised learning task in natural language processing because of its essential role in training statistical machine translation (MT) models.Although unnecessary for training neural MT models, word alignment still plays an important role in interactive applications of neural machine translation, such as annotation transfer and lexicon injection.While statistical MT methods have been replaced by neural approaches with superior performance, the twenty-year-old GIZA++ toolkit remains a key component of state-of-the-art word alignment systems.Prior work on neural word alignment has only been able to outperform GIZA++ by using its output during training.We present the first end-to-end neural word alignment method that consistently outperforms GIZA++ on three data sets.Our approach repurposes a Transformer model trained for supervised translation to also serve as an unsupervised word alignment model in a manner that is tightly integrated and does not affect translation quality.
Thomas Zenkel, Jörn Wübker, John DeNero
ACL1
2018 Term Extraction via Neural Sequence Labeling a Comparative Evaluation of Strategies Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Maren Kucza, Jan Niehues, Thomas Zenkel, Alex Waibel, Sebastian Stüker
INTERSPEECH3
2018 Subword and Crossword Units for CTC Acoustic Models
abstract
This paper proposes a novel approach to create an unit set for CTC based speech recognition systems. By using Byte Pair Encoding we learn an unit set of an arbitrary size on a given training text. In contrast to using characters or words as units this allows us to find a good trade-off between the size of our unit set and the available training data. We evaluate both Crossword units, that may span multiple word, and Subword units. By combining this approach with decoding methods using a separate language model we are able to achieve state of the art results for grapheme based CTC systems.
Thomas Zenkel, Ramon Sanabria, Florian Metze, Alex Waibel
INTERSPEECH1
2017 Comparison of Decoding Strategies for CTC Acoustic Models
abstract
Connectionist Temporal Classification has recently attracted a lot of interest as it offers an elegant approach to building acoustic models (AMs) for speech recognition. The CTC loss function maps an input sequence of observable feature vectors to an output sequence of symbols. Output symbols are conditionally independent of each other under CTC loss, so a language model (LM) can be incorporated conveniently during decoding, retaining the traditional separation of acoustic and linguistic components in ASR. For fixed vocabularies, Weighted Finite State Transducers provide a strong baseline for efficient integration of CTC AMs with n-gram LMs. Character-based neural LMs provide a straight forward solution for open vocabulary speech recognition and all-neural models, and can be decoded with beam search. Finally, sequence-to-sequence models can be used to translate a sequence of individual sounds into a word string. We compare the performance of these three approaches, and analyze their error patterns, which provides insightful guidance for future research and development in this important area.
Thomas Zenkel, Ramon Sanabria, Florian Metze, Jan Niehues, Matthias Sperber, Sebastian Stüker, Alex Waibel
INTERSPEECH1