Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emre Durmus

dblp:205/3021 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Digital forensics and information hiding · 36% Authentication and access control · 28% Usable security · 28%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › knowledge-based authentication
PIN authentication
0.312017
IllusionPIN: Shoulder-Surfing Resistant Authentication Using Hybrid Images · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017
Usable security
shoulder surfing
0.312017
IllusionPIN: Shoulder-Surfing Resistant Authentication Using Hybrid Images · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017
Computational geometry › intersection graphs
interval graphs
0.112019
Every Shred Helps: Assembling Evidence From Orphaned JPEG Fragments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019
Biometric security › biometric authentication
touch-based authentication
0.112017
IllusionPIN: Shoulder-Surfing Resistant Authentication Using Hybrid Images · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interval graph algorithms · 0.8image stitching · 0.8compatibility metric · 0.8hybrid images · 0.3human visual perception · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Every Shred Helps: Assembling Evidence From Orphaned JPEG Fragments
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of forensic photo carving, which serves as one of the key sources of digital evidence in modern law enforcement. We propose efficient algorithms for assembling meaningful photographs from orphaned photofragments, carved without access to file headers, meta-data, or compression settings. The addressed problem raises a novel variant of a jigsaw puzzle with an unknown number of mixed images, missing pieces, and severe brightness and colorization artifacts. We construct an efficient compatibility metric for matching puzzle pieces and a corresponding image stitching procedure which allows us to mitigate these artifacts. To facilitate photo assembly, we perform a forensic analysis of the fragments to provide clues about their location within the frame of the imaging sensor. The proposed algorithm formulates the assembly problem as finding non-overlapping sets in an interval graph spanned over the input fragments. The algorithm exhibits lower computational complexity compared with a popular puzzle-solving approach based on minimal spanning trees.
Emre Durmus, Pawel Korus, Nasir Memon
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2017 IllusionPIN: Shoulder-Surfing Resistant Authentication Using Hybrid Images
abstract
We address the problem of shoulder-surfing attacks on authentication schemes by proposing IllusionPIN (IPIN), a PIN-based authentication method that operates on touchscreen devices. IPIN uses the technique of hybrid images to blend two keypads with different digit orderings in such a way, that the user who is close to the device is seeing one keypad to enter her PIN, while the attacker who is looking at the device from a bigger distance is seeing only the other keypad. The user's keypad is shuffled in every authentication attempt, since the attacker may memorize the spatial arrangement of the pressed digits. To reason about the security of IPIN, we developed an algorithm which is based on human visual perception and estimates the minimum distance from which an observer is unable to interpret the keypad of the user. We tested our estimations with 84 simulated shoulder-surfing attacks from 21 different people. None of the attacks was successful against our estimations. In addition, we estimated the minimum distance from which a camera is unable to capture the visual information from the keypad of the user. Based on our analysis, it seems practically almost impossible for a surveillance camera to capture the PIN of a smartphone user when IPIN is in use.
Athanasios Papadopoulos 0001, Toan Nguyen 0001, Emre Durmus, Nasir Memon
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.3