Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gabriel Huang
dblp:205/3137
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1418-6569ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 45% Reinforcement learning · 15% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
benchmark design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
few-shot object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey of Self-Supervised and Few-Shot Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey of Self-Supervised and Few-Shot Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › detector training
self-supervised object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey of Self-Supervised and Few-Shot Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics
earth observation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
foundation models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring · NeurIPS 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Repurposing Pretrained Models for Robust Out-of-domain Few-Shot Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hybrid architecture |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scattering Networks for Hybrid Representation Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
scattering network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scattering Networks for Hybrid Representation Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Survey of Self-Supervised and Few-Shot Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
GAN-based image generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Scattering Networks for Hybrid Representation Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 1.3model evaluation methodology · 1.3self-supervised pretraining · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7pre-trained model · 0.5meta-learning · 0.5scattering transform · 0.4residual network · 0.4GAN · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth MonitoringabstractRecent progress in self-supervision has shown that pre-training large neural networks on vast amounts of unsupervised data can lead to substantial increases in generalization to downstream tasks. Such models, recently coined foundation models, have been transformational to the field of natural language processing.Variants have also been proposed for image data, but their applicability to remote sensing tasks is limited.To stimulate the development of foundation models for Earth monitoring, we propose a benchmark comprised of six classification and six segmentation tasks, which were carefully curated and adapted to be both relevant to the field and well-suited for model evaluation. We accompany this benchmark with a robust methodology for evaluating models and reporting aggregated results to enable a reliable assessment of progress. Finally, we report results for 20 baselines to gain information about the performance of existing models.We believe that this benchmark will be a driver of progress across a variety of Earth monitoring tasks. Alexandre Lacoste, Nils Lehmann, Pau Rodríguez, Evan D. Sherwin, Hannah Kerner, Björn Lütjens, Jeremy Irvin, David Dao, Hamed Alemohammad, Alexandre Drouin, Mehmet Gunturkun, Gabriel Huang, David Vázquez 0001, Dava J. Newman, Yoshua Bengio, Stefano Ermon, Xiao Xiang Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 12 |
| 2023 | A Survey of Self-Supervised and Few-Shot Object DetectionabstractLabeling data is often expensive and time-consuming, especially for tasks such as object detection and instance segmentation, which require dense labeling of the image. While few-shot object detection is about training a model on novel (unseen) object classes with little data, it still requires prior training on many labeled examples of base (seen) classes. On the other hand, self-supervised methods aim at learning representations from unlabeled data which transfer well to downstream tasks such as object detection. Combining few-shot and self-supervised object detection is a promising research direction. In this survey, we review and characterize the most recent approaches on few-shot and self-supervised object detection. Then, we give our main takeaways and discuss future research directions. Project page: https://gabrielhuang.github.io/fsod-survey/. Gabriel Huang, Issam H. Laradji, David Vázquez 0001, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Pau Rodríguez |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Repurposing Pretrained Models for Robust Out-of-domain Few-Shot Learning
Namyeong Kwon, Hwidong Na, Gabriel Huang, Simon Lacoste-Julien |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2019 | Negative Momentum for Improved Game DynamicsabstractGames generalize the single-objective optimization paradigm by introducing different objective functions for different players. Differentiable games often proceed by simultaneous or alternating gradient updates. In machine learning, games are gaining new importance through formulations like generative adversarial networks (GANs) and actor-critic systems. However, compared to single-objective optimization, game dynamics is more complex and less understood. In this paper, we analyze gradient-based methods with momentum on simple games. We prove that alternating updates are more stable than simultaneous updates. Next, we show both theoretically and empirically that alternating gradient updates with a negative momentum term achieves convergence in a difficult toy adversarial problem, but also on the notoriously difficult to train saturating GANs. Gauthier Gidel, Reyhane Askari Hemmat, Mohammad Pezeshki, Rémi Le Priol, Gabriel Huang, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Ioannis Mitliagkas |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2019 | Scattering Networks for Hybrid Representation LearningabstractScattering networks are a class of designed Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with fixed weights. We argue they can serve as generic representations for modelling images. In particular, by working in scattering space, we achieve competitive results both for supervised and unsupervised learning tasks, while making progress towards constructing more interpretable CNNs. For supervised learning, we demonstrate that the early layers of CNNs do not necessarily need to be learned, and can be replaced with a scattering network instead. Indeed, using hybrid architectures, we achieve the best results with predefined representations to-date, while being competitive with end-to-end learned CNNs. Specifically, even applying a shallow cascade of small-windowed scattering coefficients followed by $1\times 1$1×1-convolutions results in AlexNet accuracy on the ILSVRC2012 classification task. Moreover, by combining scattering networks with deep residual networks, we achieve a single-crop top-5 error of 11.4 percent on ILSVRC2012. Also, we show they can yield excellent performance in the small sample regime on CIFAR-10 and STL-10 datasets, exceeding their end-to-end counterparts, through their ability to incorporate geometrical priors. For unsupervised learning, scattering coefficients can be a competitive representation that permits image recovery. We use this fact to train hybrid GANs to generate images. Finally, we empirically analyze several properties related to stability and reconstruction of images from scattering coefficients. Edouard Oyallon, Sergey Zagoruyko, Gabriel Huang, Nikos Komodakis, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Matthew B. Blaschko, Eugene Belilovsky |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |