Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Michael Lindsey

dblp:205/4293 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 48% Generative modeling · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias
1.622025
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks · ICML 2025
Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent
0.912025
Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.812024
Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
margin maximization
0.812024
Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › continuous-time generative model
stochastic interpolants
0.812024
Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic Interpolants · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.212024
Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic Interpolants · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
two-layer neural network training
0.212024
Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent · 1.6exponential loss · 0.9KKT conditions · 0.9stochastic interpolants · 0.8score matching · 0.8margin analysis · 0.8empirical risk minimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks
abstract
We establish the asymptotic implicit bias of gradient descent (GD) for generic non-homogeneous deep networks under exponential loss. Specifically, we characterize three key properties of GD iterates starting from a sufficiently small empirical risk, where the threshold is determined by a measure of the network's non-homogeneity. First, we show that a normalized margin induced by the GD iterates increases nearly monotonically. Second, we prove that while the norm of the GD iterates diverges to infinity, the iterates themselves converge in direction. Finally, we establish that this directional limit satisfies the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions of a margin maximization problem. Prior works on implicit bias have focused exclusively on homogeneous networks; in contrast, our results apply to a broad class of non-homogeneous networks satisfying a mild near-homogeneity condition. In particular, our results apply to networks with residual connections and non-homogeneous activation functions, thereby resolving an open problem posed byJi & Telgarsky (2020).
Yuhang Cai, Kangjie Zhou, Jingfeng Wu, Song Mei, Michael Lindsey, Peter L. Bartlett
ICML5
2024 Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic Interpolants
abstract
Given a set of $K$ probability densities, we consider the multimarginal generative modeling problem of learning a joint distribution that recovers these densities as marginals. The structure of this joint distribution should identify multi-way correspondences among the prescribed marginals. We formalize an approach to this task within a generalization of the stochastic interpolant framework, leading to efficient learning algorithms built upon dynamical transport of measure. Our generative models are defined by velocity and score fields that can be characterized as the minimizers of simple quadratic objectives, and they are defined on a simplex that generalizes the time variable in the usual dynamical transport framework. The resulting transport on the simplex is influenced by all marginals, and we show that multi-way correspondences can be extracted. The identification of such correspondences has applications to style transfer, algorithmic fairness, and data decorruption. In addition, the multimarginal perspective enables an efficient algorithm for optimizing the dynamical transport cost in the ordinary two-marginal setting. We demonstrate these capacities with several numerical examples.
Michael S. Albergo, Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael Lindsey, Eric Vanden-Eijnden
ICLR3
2024 Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization
abstract
The typical training of neural networks using large stepsize gradient descent (GD) under the logistic loss often involves two distinct phases, where the empirical risk oscillates in the first phase but decreases monotonically in the second phase. We investigate this phenomenon in two-layer networks that satisfy a near-homogeneity condition. We show that the second phase begins once the empirical risk falls below a certain threshold, dependent on the stepsize. Additionally, we show that the normalized margin grows nearly monotonically in the second phase, demonstrating an implicit bias of GD in training non-homogeneous predictors. If the dataset is linearly separable and the derivative of the activation function is bounded away from zero, we show that the average empirical risk decreases, implying that the first phase must stop in finite steps. Finally, we demonstrate that by choosing a suitably large stepsize, GD that undergoes this phase transition is more efficient than GD that monotonically decreases the risk. Our analysis applies to networks of any width, beyond the well-known neural tangent kernel and mean-field regimes.
Yuhang Cai, Jingfeng Wu, Song Mei, Michael Lindsey, Peter L. Bartlett
NeurIPS4