Xianda Zheng, Zijian Huang, Meng-Fen Chiang, Jiamou Liu, Yuan Fang, Michael J. Witbrock, Kaiqi Zhao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.

Analogical reasoning over Multimodal Knowledge Graphs (MMKGs) couples abductive relation induction with inductive tail completion. However, existing approaches rely on static fusion mechanisms that overlook the inherent asymmetry of modal relevance: while visual cues elucidate concrete entities, they are often noisy or irrelevant for abstract concepts, where text and graph structure provide decisive signals. Furthermore, prior methods fail to enforce consistency between induced relations and the modality patterns implied by the analogical context. To bridge this gap, we introduce RMAR, a Relation-aware Multimodal Analogical Reasoning framework with two complementary paths. An explicit path estimates modality fingerprints to score compatibility during relation induction and guide fusion during tail completion. An implicit path employs adaptive gating to blend structural, textual, and visual signals conditioned on the specific query context. To address the limitations of current benchmarks, which overrepresent concrete entities, we release MCNetAnalogy, and its companion graph, MCNetKG, a rigorous dataset enriched with abstract concepts and actions. RMAR is backbone-agnostic and works with multimodal knowledge graph embedding (MKGE) and transformer-based (MPT) pipelines. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RMAR delivers consistent gains across both embedding-based and transformer-based backbones, achieving a 29% relative improvement on MCNetAnalogy. Ablation studies confirm that RMAR's relation-aware modulation is particularly effective when modal evidence is weak or ambiguous.

Judgment summaries are beneficial for legal practitioners to comprehend and retrieve case law efficiently. Unlike summaries in general domains, e.g., news, judgment summaries often require a clear structure. Such a structure helps readers grasp the information contained in the summary and reduces information loss. To the best of our knowledge, none of the existing text summarizers can generate summaries aligned with the summary structure in the legal domain. Inspired by this observation, this paper introduces a Summary Structure-Enhanced (SSE) method to synthesize structured summaries for legal documents. SSE can easily be incorporated into the Encoder-Decoder framework, which is commonly adopted in state-of-the-art text summarizers. Experiments on the datasets of New Zealand and Chinese judgments show that the proposed method consistently improves the performance of state-of-the-art summarizers in terms of Rouge scores.

Logical reasoning over Knowledge Graphs (KGs) for first-order logic (FOL) queries performs the query inference over KGs with logical operators, including conjunction, disjunction, existential quantification and negation, to approximate true answers in embedding spaces. However, most existing work imposes strong distributional assumptions (e.g., Beta distribution) to represent entities and queries into presumed distributional shape, which limits their expressive power. Moreover, query embeddings are challenging due to the relational complexities in multi-relational KGs (e.g., symmetry, anti-symmetry and transitivity). To bridge the gap, we propose a logical query reasoning framework, Line Embedding (LinE), for FOL queries. To relax the distributional assumptions, we introduce the logic space transformation layer, which is a generic neural function that converts embeddings from probabilistic distribution space to LinE embeddings space. To tackle multi-relational and logical complexities, we formulate neural relation-specific projections and individual logical operators to truthfully ground LinE query embeddings on logical regularities and KG factoids. Lastly, to verify the LinE embedding quality, we generate a FOL query dataset from WordNet, which richly encompasses hierarchical relations. Extensive experiments show superior reasoning sensitivity of LinE on three benchmarks against strong baselines, particularly for multi-hop relational queries and negation-related queries.