Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Milan Aggarwal
dblp:206/6244
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
10since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6246-9750ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Language models and text generation · 36% Information extraction and text analysis · 18% Question answering and dialogue systems · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
rationale generation |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | It Helps to Take a Second Opinion: Teaching Smaller LLMs To Deliberate Mutually via Selective Rationale Optimisation · ICLR 2025 Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale Tuning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale Tuning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › lightweight neural network
small language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | It Helps to Take a Second Opinion: Teaching Smaller LLMs To Deliberate Mutually via Selective Rationale Optimisation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
small language model reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale Tuning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech enhancement
noise reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CABINET: Content Relevance-based Noise Reduction for Table Question Answering · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CABINET: Content Relevance-based Noise Reduction for Table Question Answering · ICLR 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
advertisement understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
neural topic model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | TAN-NTM: Topic Attention Networks for Neural Topic Modeling · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | TAN-NTM: Topic Attention Networks for Neural Topic Modeling · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document analysis
document structure extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Form2Seq : A Framework for Higher-Order Form Structure Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding › table recognition
table structure recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Form2Seq : A Framework for Higher-Order Form Structure Extraction · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | It Helps to Take a Second Opinion: Teaching Smaller LLMs To Deliberate Mutually via Selective Rationale Optimisation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CABINET: Content Relevance-based Noise Reduction for Table Question Answering · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | TAN-NTM: Topic Attention Networks for Neural Topic Modeling · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Document Structure Extraction Using Prior Based High Resolution Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation · ECCV (28) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task attention fusion · 1.3image segmentation · 1.3selective rationale optimization · 0.9preference optimization · 0.9multi-agent collaboration · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9weakly supervised parsing · 0.8unsupervised relevance scoring · 0.8variational autoencoder · 0.5topic attention networks · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Enhancing Enterprise Assistant Responses with Rich Multimodal Artifacts from Product Documentation
Sohan Patnaik, Sai Sree Harsha, H. S. V. N. S. Kowndinya Renduchintala, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Yunyao Li 0001 |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2025 | Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale TuningabstractLLMs such as GPT-4 have shown a remarkable ability to solve complex questions by generating step-by-step rationales. Prior works have utilized this capability to improve smaller and cheaper LMs (say, with 7B parameters). However, various practical constraints, such as copyright and legal issues, owing to lack of transparency in the pre-training data of large (often closed) models, prevent their use in commercial settings. Little focus has been given to improving the innate reasoning ability of smaller models without distilling information from larger LLMs. To address this, we propose COLLATE, a trainable framework that tunes a (small) LLM to generate those outputs from a pool of diverse rationales that selectively improves the downstream task. COLLATE enforces multiple instances of the same LLM to exhibit distinct behavior and employs them to generate rationales to obtain diverse outputs. The LLM is then tuned via preference optimization to choose the candidate rationale which maximizes the likelihood of ground-truth answer. COLLATE outperforms several trainable and prompting baselines on 5 datasets across 3 domains - maths problem solving, natural language inference, and commonsense reasoning. We show the efficacy of COLLATE on LLMs from different model families across varying parameter scales (1B to 8B) and demonstrate the benefit of multiple rationale providers guided by the end task through ablations. Code is released here (https://github.com/Sohanpatnaik106/collate). Sohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | It Helps to Take a Second Opinion: Teaching Smaller LLMs To Deliberate Mutually via Selective Rationale OptimisationabstractVery large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 have shown the ability to handle complex tasks by generating and self-refining step-by-step rationales. Smaller language models (SLMs), typically with < 13B parameters, have been improved by using the data generated from very-large LMs through knowledge distillation. However, various practical constraints such as API costs, copyright, legal and ethical policies restrict using large (often opaque) models to train smaller models for commercial use. Limited success has been achieved at improving the ability of an SLM to explore the space of possible rationales and evaluate them by itself through self-deliberation. To address this, we propose COALITION, a trainable framework that facilitates interaction between two variants of the same SLM and trains them to generate and refine rationales optimized for the end-task. The variants exhibit different behaviors to produce a set of diverse candidate rationales during the generation and refinement steps. The model is then trained via Selective Rationale Optimization (SRO) to prefer generating rationale candidates that maximize the likelihood of producing the ground-truth answer. During inference, COALITION employs a controller to select the suitable variant for generating and refining the rationales. On five different datasets covering mathematical problems, commonsense reasoning, and natural language inference, COALITION outperforms several baselines by up to 5%. Our ablation studies reveal that cross-communication between the two variants performs better than using the single model to self-refine the rationales. We also demonstrate the applicability of COALITION for LMs of varying scales (4B to 14B parameters) and model families (Mistral, Llama, Qwen, Phi). We release the code for this work here. Sohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | CABINET: Content Relevance-based Noise Reduction for Table Question AnsweringabstractTable understanding capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been extensively studied through the task of question-answering (QA) over tables. Typically, only a small part of the whole table is relevant to derive the answer for a given question. The irrelevant parts act as noise and are distracting information, resulting in sub-optimal performance due to the vulnerability of LLMs to noise. To mitigate this, we propose CABINET (Content RelevAnce-Based NoIse ReductioN for TablE QuesTion-Answering) – a framework to enable LLMs to focus on relevant tabular data by suppressing extraneous information. CABINET comprises an Unsupervised Relevance Scorer (URS), trained differentially with the QA LLM, that weighs the table content based on its relevance to the input question before feeding it to the question answering LLM (QA LLM). To further aid the relevance scorer, CABINET employs a weakly supervised module that generates a parsing statement describing the criteria of rows and columns relevant to the question and highlights the content of corresponding table cells. CABINET significantly outperforms various tabular LLM baselines, as well as GPT3-based in-context learning methods, is more robust to noise, maintains outperformance on tables of varying sizes, and establishes new SoTA performance on WikiTQ, FeTaQA, and WikiSQL datasets. We release our code and datasets here. Sohan Patnaik, Heril Changwal, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Yaman Singla, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Persuasion Strategies in AdvertisementsabstractModeling what makes an advertisement persuasive, i.e., eliciting the desired response from consumer, is critical to the study of propaganda, social psychology, and marketing. Despite its importance, computational modeling of persuasion in computer vision is still in its infancy, primarily due to the lack of benchmark datasets that can provide persuasion-strategy labels associated with ads. Motivated by persuasion literature in social psychology and marketing, we introduce an extensive vocabulary of persuasion strategies and build the first ad image corpus annotated with persuasion strategies. We then formulate the task of persuasion strategy prediction with multi-modal learning, where we design a multi-task attention fusion model that can leverage other ad-understanding tasks to predict persuasion strategies. The dataset also provides image segmentation masks, which labels persuasion strategies in the corresponding ad images on the test split. We publicly release our code and dataset at https://midas-research.github.io/persuasion-advertisements/. Yaman Singla, Rajat Jha, Arunim Gupta, Milan Aggarwal, Aditya Garg, Tushar Malyan, Ayush Bhardwaj, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Changyou Chen |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2023 | Computable Contracts by Extracting Obligation Logic GraphsabstractThe emergence of contract specific programming languages has struggled to translate into widespread adoption of computable contracts due largely to high conversion costs. In this work, we present the first system for converting natural language contracts into code through the extraction of key entities, relationships, and formulas into a graph representation called the Obligation Logic Graph (OLG). This approach allows the semantic meaning of contract obligations, including dependencies between obligations, to be captured through the OLG and mapped to code downstream. We also introduce OLG extraction as a new joint entity and relation prediction task for legal contracts, and present the Contract-OLG dataset, consisting of 1,876 contract provisions, 18,597 entities and 18,170 relationships. We perform detailed experiments to understand the capabilities of state-of-the-art Transformer and graph-based models at completing these tasks, and identify where there is currently a significant gap between human expert and machine performance, particularly for relation extraction. Sergio Servantez, Nedim Lipka, Alexa F. Siu, Milan Aggarwal, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Aparna Garimella, Kristian J. Hammond, Rajiv Jain |
ICAIL | 4 |
| 2023 | One-Shot Doc Snippet Detection: Powering Search in Document Beyond TextabstractActive consumption of digital documents has yielded scope for research in various applications, including search. Traditionally, searching within a document has been cast as a text matching problem ignoring the rich layout and visual cues commonly present in structured documents, forms, etc. To that end, we ask a mostly unexplored question: "Can we search for other similar snippets present in a target document page given a single query instance of a document snippet?". We propose MONOMER to solve this as a one-shot snippet detection task. MONOMER fuses context from visual, textual, and spatial modalities of snippets and documents to find query snippet in target documents. We conduct extensive ablations and experiments showing MONOMER outperforms several baselines from one-shot object detection (BHRL), template matching, and document understanding (LayoutLMv3). Due to the scarcity of relevant data for the task at hand, we train MONOMER on programmatically generated data having many visually similar query snippets and target document pairs from two datasets - Flamingo Forms and PubLayNet. We also do a human study to validate the generated data. Abhinav Java, Shripad V. Deshmukh, Milan Aggarwal, Surgan Jandial, Mausoom Sarkar, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
WACV | 3 |
| 2022 | SHERLock: Self-Supervised Hierarchical Event Representation LearningabstractTemporal event representations are an essential aspect of learning among humans. They allow for succinct encoding of the experiences we have through a variety of sensory inputs. Also, they are believed to be arranged hierarchically, allowing for an efficient representation of complex long-horizon experiences. Additionally, these representations are acquired in a self-supervised manner. Analogously, here we propose a model that learns temporal representations from long-horizon visual demonstration data and associated textual descriptions, without explicit temporal supervision. Our method produces a hierarchy of representations that align more closely with ground-truth human-annotated events (+15.3%) than state-of-the-art unsupervised baselines. Our results are comparable to heavily-supervised baselines in complex visual domains such as Chess Openings, YouCook2 and TutorialVQA datasets. Finally, we perform ablation studies illustrating the robustness of our approach. We release our code and demo visualizations in the Supplementary Material. S. Roychowdhury, Sumedh A. Sontakke, Laurent Itti, M. Sarkar, Milan Aggarwal, Pinkesh Badjatiya, Nikaash Puri, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ICPR | 5 |
| 2022 | CoSe-Co: Text Conditioned Generative CommonSense ContextualizerabstractRachit Bansal, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Jivat Kaur, Balaji Krishnamurthy. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Rachit Bansal, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Jivat Neet Kaur, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2021 | TAN-NTM: Topic Attention Networks for Neural Topic ModelingabstractMadhur Panwar, Shashank Shailabh, Milan Aggarwal, Balaji Krishnamurthy. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Madhur Panwar, Shashank Shailabh, Milan Aggarwal, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Document Structure Extraction Using Prior Based High Resolution Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation
Mausoom Sarkar, Milan Aggarwal, Arneh Jain, Hiresh Gupta, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
ECCV (28) | 2 |
| 2020 | Form2Seq : A Framework for Higher-Order Form Structure ExtractionabstractDocument structure extraction has been a widely researched area for decades with recent works performing it as a semantic segmentation task over document images using fullyconvolution networks.Such methods are limited by image resolution due to which they fail to disambiguate structures in dense regions which appear commonly in forms.To mitigate this, we propose Form2Seq, a novel sequenceto-sequence (Seq2Seq) inspired framework for structure extraction using text, with a specific focus on forms, which leverages relative spatial arrangement of structures.We discuss two tasks; 1) Classification of low-level constituent elements (TextBlock and empty fillable Widget) into ten types such as field captions, list items, and others; 2) Grouping lower-level elements into higher-order constructs, such as Text Fields, ChoiceFields and ChoiceGroups, used as information collection mechanism in forms.To achieve this, we arrange the constituent elements linearly in natural reading order, feed their spatial and textual representations to Seq2Seq framework, which sequentially outputs prediction of each element depending on the final task.We modify Seq2Seq for grouping task and discuss improvements obtained through cascaded end-to-end training of two tasks versus training in isolation.Experimental results show the effectiveness of our text-based approach achieving an accuracy of 90% on classification task and an F1 of 75.82, 86.01, 61.63 on groups discussed above respectively, outperforming segmentation baselines.Further we show our framework achieves state of the results for table structure recognition on ICDAR 2013 dataset. Milan Aggarwal, Hiresh Gupta, Mausoom Sarkar, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Multi-Modal Association based Grouping for Form Structure ExtractionabstractDocument structure extraction has been a widely researched area for decades. Recent work in this direction has been deep learning-based, mostly focusing on extracting structure using fully convolution NN through semantic segmentation. In this work, we present a novel multi-modal approach for form structure extraction. Given simple elements such as textruns and widgets, we extract higher-order structures such as TextBlocks, Text Fields, Choice Fields, and Choice Groups, which are essential for information collection in forms. To achieve this, we obtain a local image patch around each low-level element (reference) by identifying candidate elements closest to it. We process textual and spatial representation of candidates sequentially through a BiLSTM to obtain context-aware representations and fuse them with image patch features obtained by processing it through a CNN. Subsequently, the sequential decoder takes this fused feature vector to predict the association type between reference and candidates. These predicted associations are utilized to determine larger structures through connected components analysis. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our approach achieving a recall of 90.29%, 73.80%, 83.12%, and 52.72% for the above structures, respectively, outperforming semantic segmentation baselines significantly. We show the efficacy of our method through ablations, comparing it against using individual modalities. We also introduce our new rich human-annotated Forms Dataset. Milan Aggarwal, Mausoom Sarkar, Hiresh Gupta, Balaji Krishnamurthy |
WACV | 1 |