Kenichi Bannai

dblp:206/6410 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-9493-0265ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.412019
Bézier Simplex Fitting: Describing Pareto Fronts of Simplicial Problems with Small Samples in Multi-Objective Optimization · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto set approximation
0.412019
Bézier Simplex Fitting: Describing Pareto Fronts of Simplicial Problems with Small Samples in Multi-Objective Optimization · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simplex decomposition · 0.4bézier simplex · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Theory and Algorithms for Shapelet-Based Multiple-Instance Learning
abstract
We propose a new formulation of multiple-instance learning (MIL), in which a unit of data consists of a set of instances called a bag. The goal is to find a good classifier of bags based on the similarity with a "shapelet" (or pattern), where the similarity of a bag with a shapelet is the maximum similarity of instances in the bag. In previous work, some of the training instances have been chosen as shapelets with no theoretical justification. In our formulation, we use all possible, and thus infinitely many, shapelets, resulting in a richer class of classifiers. We show that the formulation is tractable, that is, it can be reduced through linear programming boosting (LPBoost) to difference of convex (DC) programs of finite (actually polynomial) size. Our theoretical result also gives justification to the heuristics of some previous work. The time complexity of the proposed algorithm highly depends on the size of the set of all instances in the training sample. To apply to the data containing a large number of instances, we also propose a heuristic option of the algorithm without the loss of the theoretical guarantee. Our empirical study demonstrates that our algorithm uniformly works for shapelet learning tasks on time-series classification and various MIL tasks with comparable accuracy to the existing methods. Moreover, we show that the proposed heuristics allow us to achieve the result in reasonable computational time.
Daiki Suehiro, Kohei Hatano, Eiji Takimoto, Shuji Yamamoto, Kenichi Bannai, Akiko Takeda
Neural Comput.5
2019 Bézier Simplex Fitting: Describing Pareto Fronts of Simplicial Problems with Small Samples in Multi-Objective Optimization
abstract
Multi-objective optimization problems require simultaneously optimizing two or more objective functions. Many studies have reported that the solution set of an M-objective optimization problem often forms an (M − 1)-dimensional topological simplex (a curved line for M = 2, a curved triangle for M = 3, a curved tetrahedron for M = 4, etc.). Since the dimensionality of the solution set increases as the number of objectives grows, an exponentially large sample size is needed to cover the solution set. To reduce the required sample size, this paper proposes a Bézier simplex model and its fitting algorithm. These techniques can exploit the simplex structure of the solution set and decompose a high-dimensional surface fitting task into a sequence of low-dimensional ones. An approximation theorem of Bézier simplices is proven. Numerical experiments with synthetic and real-world optimization problems demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an accurate approximation of high-dimensional solution sets with small samples. In practice, such an approximation will be conducted in the postoptimization process and enable a better trade-off analysis.
Ken Kobayashi, Naoki Hamada, Akiyoshi Sannai, Akinori Tanaka, Kenichi Bannai, Masashi Sugiyama
AAAI5