Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hongming Pu

dblp:206/6699 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power
0.312017
The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network width
0.312017
The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation
0.312017
The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width · NIPS 2017
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation
0.112017
The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universal approximation theorem · 0.6depth-efficiency analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Width
abstract
The expressive power of neural networks is important for understanding deep learning. Most existing works consider this problem from the view of the depth of a network. In this paper, we study how width affects the expressiveness of neural networks. Classical results state that depth-bounded (e.g. depth-2) networks with suitable activation functions are universal approximators. We show a universal approximation theorem for width-bounded ReLU networks: width-(n + 4) ReLU networks, where n is the input dimension, are universal approximators. Moreover, except for a measure zero set, all functions cannot be approximated by width-n ReLU networks, which exhibits a phase transition. Several recent works demonstrate the benefits of depth by proving the depth-efficiency of neural networks. That is, there are classes of deep networks which cannot be realized by any shallow network whose size is no more than an exponential bound. Here we pose the dual question on the width-efficiency of ReLU networks: Are there wide networks that cannot be realized by narrow networks whose size is not substantially larger? We show that there exist classes of wide networks which cannot be realized by any narrow network whose depth is no more than a polynomial bound. On the other hand, we demonstrate by extensive experiments that narrow networks whose size exceed the polynomial bound by a constant factor can approximate wide and shallow network with high accuracy. Our results provide more comprehensive evidence that depth may be more effective than width for the expressiveness of ReLU networks.
Hongming Pu, Feicheng Wang, Liwei Wang 0001
NIPS2