Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiancan Zhou

dblp:207/3389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 43%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
1.322023
UniTSFace: Unified Threshold Integrated Sample-to-Sample Loss for Face Recognition · NeurIPS 2023
UniFace: Unified Cross-Entropy Loss for Deep Face Recognition · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design
1.322023
UniTSFace: Unified Threshold Integrated Sample-to-Sample Loss for Face Recognition · NeurIPS 2023
UniFace: Unified Cross-Entropy Loss for Deep Face Recognition · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face verification
0.712023
UniTSFace: Unified Threshold Integrated Sample-to-Sample Loss for Face Recognition · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
margin-based softmax loss
0.212023
UniFace: Unified Cross-Entropy Loss for Deep Face Recognition · ICCV 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

softmax loss · 1.3sample-to-sample loss · 0.7margin · 0.7BCE loss · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AEPL: Adaptive empirical prototype learning with dynamic margins for deep face recognition
Weijia Fan, Zhixiang Cai, Chunsong Chen, Yanxi Liu 0004, Jiajun Wen 0001, Xi Jia, LinLin Shen, Jiancan Zhou, Qiufu Li
Pattern Anal. Appl.9
2023 UniFace: Unified Cross-Entropy Loss for Deep Face Recognition
abstract
As a widely used loss function in deep face recognition, the softmax loss cannot guarantee that the minimum positive sample-to-class similarity is larger than the maximum negative sample-to-class similarity. As a result, no unified threshold is available to separate positive sample-to-class pairs from negative sample-to-class pairs. To bridge this gap, we design a UCE (Unified Cross-Entropy) loss for face recognition model training, which is built on the vital constraint that all the positive sample-to-class similarities shall be larger than the negative ones. Our UCE loss can be integrated with margins for a further performance boost. The face recognition model trained with the proposed UCE loss, UniFace, was intensively evaluated using a number of popular public datasets like MFR, IJB-C, LFW, CFP-FP, AgeDB, and MegaFace. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms SOTA methods like SphereFace, CosFace, ArcFace, Partial FC, etc. Especially, till the submission of this work (Mar. 8, 2023), the proposed UniFace achieves the highest TAR@MR-All on the academic track of the MFR-ongoing challenge. $\color{Blue}{\mathbf{Code}}$ is publicly available.
Jiancan Zhou, Xi Jia, Qiufu Li, LinLin Shen, Jinming Duan 0001
ICCV1
2023 UniTSFace: Unified Threshold Integrated Sample-to-Sample Loss for Face Recognition
abstract
Sample-to-class-based face recognition models can not fully explore the cross-sample relationship among large amounts of facial images, while sample-to-sample-based models require sophisticated pairing processes for training. Furthermore, neither method satisfies the requirements of real-world face verification applications, which expect a unified threshold separating positive from negative facial pairs. In this paper, we propose a unified threshold integrated sample-to-sample based loss (USS loss), which features an explicit unified threshold for distinguishing positive from negative pairs. Inspired by our USS loss, we also derive the sample-to-sample based softmax and BCE losses, and discuss their relationship. Extensive evaluation on multiple benchmark datasets, including MFR, IJB-C, LFW, CFP-FP, AgeDB, and MegaFace, demonstrates that the proposed USS loss is highly efficient and can work seamlessly with sample-to-class-based losses. The embedded loss (USS and sample-to-class Softmax loss) overcomes the pitfalls of previous approaches and the trained facial model UniTSFace exhibits exceptional performance, outperforming state-of-the-art methods, such as CosFace, ArcFace, VPL, AnchorFace, and UNPG. Our code is available at https://github.com/CVI-SZU/UniTSFace.
Qiufu Li, Xi Jia, Jiancan Zhou, LinLin Shen, Jinming Duan 0001
NeurIPS3
2018 Hand-Crafted Feature Guided Deep Learning for Facial Expression Recognition
abstract
A number of facial expression recognition algorithms based on hand-crafted features and deep neutral networks have been developed. Motivated by the similarity between the hand-crafted features and features learned by deep network, a new feature loss is proposed to embed the information of hand-crafted features into the training process of network, which tries to reduce the difference between the two features. Based on the feature loss, a general framework for embedding the traditional feature information was developed and tested using CK+, JAFFE and FER2013 datasets. Experimental results show that the proposed network achieves much better accuracy than the original hand-crafted feature and the network without using our feature loss. When compared with other algorithms in literature, our network also achieved the best performance on CK+ dataset, i.e. 97.35% accuracy has been achieved.
Guohang Zeng, Jiancan Zhou, Xi Jia, Weicheng Xie 0001, LinLin Shen
FG2