Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Faerevaag

dblp:207/7151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 77% Software testing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
binary analysis
0.312017
Testing intermediate representations for binary analysis · ASE 2017
Software testing
test generation
0.112017
Testing intermediate representations for binary analysis · ASE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random test case generation · 0.3differential testing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Testing intermediate representations for binary analysis
abstract
Binary lifting, which is to translate a binary executable to a high-level intermediate representation, is a primary step in binary analysis. Despite its importance, there are only few existing approaches to testing the correctness of binary lifters. Furthermore, the existing approaches suffer from low test coverage, because they largely depend on random test case generation. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of the first systematic approach to testing binary lifters. We have evaluated the proposed system on 3 state-of-the-art binary lifters, and found 24 previously unknown semantic bugs. Our result demonstrates that writing a precise binary lifter is extremely difficult even for those heavily tested projects.
Soomin Kim 0002, Markus Faerevaag, Minkyu Jung, Seungil Jung, DongYeop Oh, JongHyup Lee, Sang Kil Cha
ASE2