Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Frosst
dblp:207/8270 · also Nick Frosst
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets · NeurIPS 2021 Detecting and Diagnosing Adversarial Images with Class-Conditional Capsule Reconstructions · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
capsule network |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Matrix capsules with EM routing · ICLR (Poster) 2018 Dynamic Routing Between Capsules · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
local learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
additive models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › interpretable neural network
neural additive models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Detecting and Diagnosing Adversarial Images with Class-Conditional Capsule Reconstructions · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing and Improving Representations with the Soft Nearest Neighbor Loss · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing and Improving Representations with the Soft Nearest Neighbor Loss · ICML 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › character recognition
handwritten digit recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Dynamic Routing Between Capsules · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
local learning · 0.6interlocking backpropagation · 0.6backpropagation · 0.6gradient-based training · 0.5generalized additive model · 0.5class-conditional reconstruction · 0.4soft nearest neighbor loss · 0.4expectation-maximization routing · 0.3routing-by-agreement · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelismabstractThe number of parameters in state of the art neural networks has drastically increased in recent years. This surge of interest in large scale neural networks has motivated the development of new distributed training strategies enabling such models. One such strategy is model-parallel distributed training. Unfortunately, model-parallelism can suffer from poor resource utilisation, which leads to wasted resources. In this work, we improve upon recent developments in an idealised model-parallel optimisation setting: local learning. Motivated by poor resource utilisation in the global setting and poor task performance in the local setting, we introduce a class of intermediary strategies between local and global learning referred to as interlocking backpropagation. These strategies preserve many of the compute-efficiency advantages of local optimisation, while recovering much of the task performance achieved by global optimisation. We assess our strategies on both image classification ResNets and Transformer language models, finding that our strategy consistently out-performs local learning in terms of task performance, and out-performs global learning in training efficiency. Aidan N. Gomez, Oscar Key, Kuba Perlin, Stephen Gou, Nicholas Frosst, Jeffrey Dean, Yarin Gal |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 5 |
| 2021 | Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) are powerful black-box predictors that have achieved impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks. However, their accuracy comes at the cost of intelligibility: it is usually unclear how they make their decisions. This hinders their applicability to high stakes decision-making domains such as healthcare. We propose Neural Additive Models (NAMs) which combine some of the expressivity of DNNs with the inherent intelligibility of generalized additive models. NAMs learn a linear combination of neural networks that each attend to a single input feature. These networks are trained jointly and can learn arbitrarily complex relationships between their input feature and the output. Our experiments on regression and classification datasets show that NAMs are more accurate than widely used intelligible models such as logistic regression and shallow decision trees. They perform similarly to existing state-of-the-art generalized additive models in accuracy, but are more flexible because they are based on neural nets instead of boosted trees. To demonstrate this, we show how NAMs can be used for multitask learning on synthetic data and on the COMPAS recidivism data due to their composability, and demonstrate that the differentiability of NAMs allows them to train more complex interpretable models for COVID-19. Rishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang, Benjamin J. Lengerich, Rich Caruana, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Detecting and Diagnosing Adversarial Images with Class-Conditional Capsule Reconstructions
Yao Qin 0001, Nicholas Frosst, Sara Sabour, Colin Raffel, Garrison W. Cottrell, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | Analyzing and Improving Representations with the Soft Nearest Neighbor LossabstractWe explore and expand the Soft Nearest Neighbor Loss to measure the entanglement of class manifolds in representation space: i.e., how close pairs of points from the same class are relative to pairs of points from different classes. We demonstrate several use cases of the loss. As an analytical tool, it provides insights into the evolution of class similarity structures during learning. Surprisingly, we find that maximizing the entanglement of representations of different classes in the hidden layers is beneficial for discrimination in the final layer, possibly because it encourages representations to identify class-independent similarity structures. Maximizing the soft nearest neighbor loss in the hidden layers leads not only to better-calibrated estimates of uncertainty on outlier data but also marginally improved generalization. Data that is not from the training distribution can be recognized by observing that in the hidden layers, it has fewer than the normal number of neighbors from the predicted class. Nicholas Frosst, Nicolas Papernot, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Matrix capsules with EM routing
Geoffrey E. Hinton, Sara Sabour, Nicholas Frosst |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2017 | Dynamic Routing Between CapsulesabstractA capsule is a group of neurons whose activity vector represents the instantiation parameters of a specific type of entity such as an object or object part. We use the length of the activity vector to represent the probability that the entity exists and its orientation to represent the instantiation parameters. Active capsules at one level make predictions, via transformation matrices, for the instantiation parameters of higher-level capsules. When multiple predictions agree, a higher level capsule becomes active. We show that a discrimininatively trained, multi-layer capsule system achieves state-of-the-art performance on MNIST and is considerably better than a convolutional net at recognizing highly overlapping digits. To achieve these results we use an iterative routing-by-agreement mechanism: A lower-level capsule prefers to send its output to higher level capsules whose activity vectors have a big scalar product with the prediction coming from the lower-level capsule. Sara Sabour, Nicholas Frosst, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
NIPS | 2 |