Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avetik G. Karagulyan

dblp:207/8322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 47% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics
1.832024
Langevin Monte Carlo for strongly log-concave distributions: Randomized midpoint revisited · ICLR 2024
Bounding the Error of Discretized Langevin Algorithms for Non-Strongly Log-Concave Targets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Penalized Langevin dynamics with vanishing penalty for smooth and log-concave targets · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
1.022022
Bounding the Error of Discretized Langevin Algorithms for Non-Strongly Log-Concave Targets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Penalized Langevin dynamics with vanishing penalty for smooth and log-concave targets · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training
0.812024
Det-CGD: Compressed Gradient Descent with Matrix Stepsizes for Non-Convex Optimization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.812024
Det-CGD: Compressed Gradient Descent with Matrix Stepsizes for Non-Convex Optimization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient compression
0.812024
Det-CGD: Compressed Gradient Descent with Matrix Stepsizes for Non-Convex Optimization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.812024
Langevin Monte Carlo for strongly log-concave distributions: Randomized midpoint revisited · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.812024
Det-CGD: Compressed Gradient Descent with Matrix Stepsizes for Non-Convex Optimization · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
non-asymptotic analysis
0.812024
Langevin Monte Carlo for strongly log-concave distributions: Randomized midpoint revisited · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.812024
Langevin Monte Carlo for strongly log-concave distributions: Randomized midpoint revisited · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › estimation error bounds
non-asymptotic error bounds
0.612022
Bounding the Error of Discretized Langevin Algorithms for Non-Strongly Log-Concave Targets · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow
0.412020
Penalized Langevin dynamics with vanishing penalty for smooth and log-concave targets · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

euler discretization · 2.1wasserstein error bound · 1.5kinetic langevin diffusion · 1.5matrix stepsize · 0.8layer-wise compression · 0.8wasserstein distance · 0.6langevin diffusion · 0.6wasserstein-2 distance bounds · 0.4log-concave potential analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ELF: Federated Langevin Algorithms with Primal, Dual and Bidirectional Compression
abstract
Federated sampling algorithms have recently gained great popularity in the community of machine learning and statistics. This paper proposes a new federated sampling algorithm called Error Feedback Langevin algorithms (ELF). In particular, we analyze the combinations of EF21 and EF21-P with the federated Langevin Monte-Carlo. We propose three algorithms, P-ELF, D-ELF, and B-ELF, that use primal, dual, and bidirectional compressors. We analyze the proposed methods under Log-Sobolev inequality and provide non-asymptotic convergence guarantees. Simple experimental results support our theoretical findings.
Avetik G. Karagulyan, Peter Richtárik
UAI1
2024 Det-CGD: Compressed Gradient Descent with Matrix Stepsizes for Non-Convex Optimization
abstract
This paper introduces a new method for minimizing matrix-smooth non-convex objectives through the use of novel Compressed Gradient Descent (CGD) algorithms enhanced with a matrix-valued stepsize. The proposed algorithms are theoretically analyzed first in the single-node and subsequently in the distributed settings. Our theoretical results reveal that the matrix stepsize in CGD can capture the objective’s structure and lead to faster convergence compared to a scalar stepsize. As a byproduct of our general results, we emphasize the importance of selecting the compression mechanism and the matrix stepsize in a layer-wise manner, taking advantage of model structure. Moreover, we provide theoretical guarantees for free compression, by designing specific layer-wise compressors for the non-convex matrix smooth objectives. Our findings are supported with empirical evidence.
Hanmin Li, Avetik G. Karagulyan, Peter Richtárik
ICLR2
2024 Langevin Monte Carlo for strongly log-concave distributions: Randomized midpoint revisited
abstract
We revisit the problem of sampling from a target distribution that has a smooth strongly log-concave density everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^p$. In this context, if no additional density information is available, the randomized midpoint discretization for the kinetic Langevin diffusion is known to be the most scalable method in high dimensions with large condition numbers. Our main result is a nonasymptotic and easy to compute upper bound on the $W_2$-error of this method. To provide a more thorough explanation of our method for establishing the computable upper bound, we conduct an analysis of the midpoint discretization for the vanilla Langevin process. This analysis helps to clarify the underlying principles and provides valuable insights that we use to establish an improved upper bound for the kinetic Langevin process with the midpoint discretization. Furthermore, by applying these techniques we establish new guarantees for the kinetic Langevin process with Euler discretization, which have a better dependence on the condition number than existing upper bounds
Avetik G. Karagulyan, Arnak S. Dalalyan
ICLR2
2023 Convergence of Stein Variational Gradient Descent under a Weaker Smoothness Condition
abstract
Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD) is an important alternative to the Langevin-type algorithms for sampling from probability distributions of the form $\pi(x) \propto \exp(-V(x))$. In the existing theory of Langevin-type algorithms and SVGD, the potential function $V$ is often assumed to be $L$-smooth. However, this restrictive condition excludes a large class of potential functions such as polynomials of degree greater than $2$. Our paper studies the convergence of the SVGD algorithm for distributions with $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth potentials. This relaxed smoothness assumption was introduced by Zhang et al. [2019a] for the analysis of gradient clipping algorithms. With the help of trajectory-independent auxiliary conditions, we provide a descent lemma establishing that the algorithm decreases the KL divergence at each iteration and prove a complexity bound for SVGD in the population limit in terms of the Stein Fisher information.
Lukang Sun, Avetik G. Karagulyan, Peter Richtárik
AISTATS2
2022 Bounding the Error of Discretized Langevin Algorithms for Non-Strongly Log-Concave Targets
abstract
In this paper, we provide non-asymptotic upper bounds on the error of sampling from a target density over $\mathbb{R}^p$ using three schemes of discretized Langevin diffusions. The first scheme is the Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) algorithm, the Euler discretization of the Langevin diffusion. The second and the third schemes are, respectively, the kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo (KLMC) for differentiable potentials and the kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo for twice-differentiable potentials (KLMC2). The main focus is on the target densities that are smooth and log-concave on $\mathbb{R}^p$, but not necessarily strongly log-concave. Bounds on the computational complexity are obtained under two types of smoothness assumption: the potential has a Lipschitz-continuous gradient and the potential has a Lipschitz-continuous Hessian matrix. The error of sampling is measured by Wasserstein-$q$ distances. We advocate for the use of a new dimension-adapted scaling in the definition of the computational complexity, when Wasserstein-$q$ distances are considered. The obtained results show that the number of iterations to achieve a scaled-error smaller than a prescribed value depends only polynomially in the dimension.
Arnak S. Dalalyan, Avetik G. Karagulyan, Lionel Riou-Durand
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Penalized Langevin dynamics with vanishing penalty for smooth and log-concave targets
abstract
We study the problem of sampling from a probability distribution on $\mathbb R^p$ defined via a convex and smooth potential function. We first consider a continuous-time diffusion-type process, termed Penalized Langevin dynamics (PLD), the drift of which is the negative gradient of the potential plus a linear penalty that vanishes when time goes to infinity. An upper bound on the Wasserstein-2 distance between the distribution of the PLD at time $t$ and the target is established. This upper bound highlights the influence of the speed of decay of the penalty on the accuracy of approximation. As a consequence, in the case of low-temperature limit we infer a new result on the convergence of the penalized gradient flow for the optimization problem.
Avetik G. Karagulyan, Arnak S. Dalalyan
NeurIPS1