Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Fedus
dblp:207/8423 · also Liam Fedus
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
16 papers |
Language models and text generation · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Reinforcement learning · 16% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 39, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
2.0 | 3 | 2024 | Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning: A Winning Combination for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning: A Winning Combination for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning: A Winning Combination for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling |
1.4 | 3 | 2024 | Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pretraining and Finetuning Transformers · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
1.1 | 3 | 2020 | Language GANs Falling Short · ICLR 2020 Many Paths to Equilibrium: GANs Do Not Need to Decrease a Divergence At Every Step · ICLR (Poster) 2018 MaskGAN: Better Text Generation via Filling in the _______ · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replay · ICML 2020 Algorithmic Improvements for Deep Reinforcement Learning Applied to Interactive Fiction · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | On Bonus Based Exploration Methods In The Arcade Learning Environment · ICLR 2020 Recall Traces: Backtracking Models for Efficient Reinforcement Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Language GANs Falling Short · ICLR 2020 MaskGAN: Better Text Generation via Filling in the _______ · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pre-training and fine-tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pretraining and Finetuning Transformers · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
sparse mixture-of-experts |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sparse model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategies · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy reinforcement learning
experience replay |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replay · ICML 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › neural text generation
language GAN |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Language GANs Falling Short · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Algorithmic Improvements for Deep Reinforcement Learning Applied to Interactive Fiction · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy reinforcement learning › experience replay
replay ratio |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replay · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sparse reward |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Algorithmic Improvements for Deep Reinforcement Learning Applied to Interactive Fiction · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Language GANs Falling Short · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replay · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Graph Infomax · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Graph Infomax · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
mutual information maximization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Graph Infomax · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › game theory
equilibrium analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Many Paths to Equilibrium: GANs Do Not Need to Decrease a Divergence At Every Step · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture of experts · 1.3sparse architecture · 0.8instruction tuning · 0.8transformer · 0.7pathways · 0.7sparsity · 0.6sparse activation · 0.6scaling analysis · 0.6mixture-of-experts routing · 0.6bfloat16 training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning: A Winning Combination for Large Language ModelsabstractSparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a neural architecture design that adds learnable parameters to Large Language Models (LLMs) without increasing computational complexity (FLOPs). Instruction tuning is a technique for training LLMs to follow instructions. We advocate combining these two approaches, as we find that MoE models benefit more from instruction tuning than dense models. In particular, we conduct empirical studies across three experimental setups: (i) Direct finetuning on individual downstream tasks devoid of instruction tuning; (ii) Instruction tuning followed by in-context few-shot or zero-shot generalization on downstream tasks; and (iii) Instruction tuning supplemented by further finetuning on individual downstream tasks. In the first scenario, MoE models overall underperform dense models of identical computational capacity. This narrative, however, dramatically changes with the introduction of instruction tuning (in the second and third scenarios), used independently or in conjunction with task-specific finetuning. Our most powerful model, FLAN-MoE-32B, surpasses the performance of Flan-PaLM-62B on four benchmark tasks, while using only a third of the FLOPs. The advancements embodied by FLAN-MoE inspire a reevaluation of the design principles of large-scale, high-performance language models in the framework of task-agnostic learning. Sheng Shen 0001, Le Hou, Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du 0002, Shayne Longpre, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Barret Zoph, William Fedus, Tu Vu, Yuexin Wu, Wuyang Chen 0001, Albert Webson, Yunxuan Li, Vincent Y. Zhao, Hongkun Yu 0001, Kurt Keutzer, Trevor Darrell, Denny Zhou |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2024 | Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language ModelsabstractFinetuning language models on a collection of datasets phrased as instructions has been shown to improve model performance and generalization to unseen tasks. In this paper we explore instruction finetuning with a particular focus on (1) scaling the number of tasks, (2) scaling the model size, and (3) finetuning on chain-of-thought data. We find that instruction finetuning with the above aspects dramatically improves performance on a variety of model classes (PaLM, T5, U-PaLM), prompting setups (zero-shot, few-shot, CoT), and evaluation benchmarks (MMLU, BBH, TyDiQA, MGSM, open-ended generation, RealToxicityPrompts). For instance, Flan-PaLM 540B instruction-finetuned on 1.8K tasks outperforms PaLM 540B by a large margin (+9.4% on average). Flan-PaLM 540B achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks (at time of release), such as 75.2% on five-shot MMLU. We also publicly release Flan-T5 checkpoints,1 which achieve strong few-shot performance even compared to much larger models, such as PaLM 62B. Overall, instruction finetuning is a general method for improving the performance and usability of pretrained language models. Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Webson, Shixiang Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suzgun, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Alex Castro-Ros, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Dasha Valter, Sharan Narang, Adams Yu, Vincent Y. Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Hongkun Yu 0001, Slav Petrov, Ed H. Chi, Jeffrey Dean, Jacob Devlin, Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, Jason Wei |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 6 |
| 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with PathwaysabstractLarge language models have been shown to achieve remarkable performance across a variety of natural language tasks using few-shot learning, which drastically reduces the number of task-specific training examples needed to adapt the model to a particular application. To further our understanding of the impact of scale on few-shot learning, we trained a 540-billion parameter, densely activated, Transformer language model, which we call Pathways Language Model (PaLM). We trained PaLM on 6144 TPU v4 chips using Pathways, a new ML system which enables highly efficient training across multiple TPU Pods. We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation benchmarks. On a number of these tasks, PaLM 540B achieves breakthrough performance, outperforming the finetuned state-of-the-art on a suite of multi-step reasoning tasks, and outperforming average human performance on the recently released BIG-bench benchmark. A significant number of BIG-bench tasks showed discontinuous improvements from model scale, meaning that performance steeply increased as we scaled to our largest model. PaLM also has strong capabilities in multilingual tasks and source code generation, which we demonstrate on a wide array of benchmarks. We additionally provide a comprehensive analysis on bias and toxicity, and study the extent of training data memorization with respect to model scale. Finally, we discuss the ethical considerations related to large language models and discuss potential mitigation strategies. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham 0001, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du 0002, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, William Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeffrey Dean, Slav Petrov, Noah Fiedel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 37 |
| 2022 | Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pretraining and Finetuning Transformers
Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Jinfeng Rao, William Fedus, Samira Abnar, Hyung Won Chung, Sharan Narang, Dani Yogatama, Ashish Vaswani, Donald Metzler |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-ExpertsabstractScaling language models with more data, compute and parameters has driven significant progress in natural language processing. For example, thanks to scaling, GPT-3 was able to achieve strong results on in-context learning tasks. However, training these large dense models requires significant amounts of computing resources. In this paper, we propose and develop a family of language models named \glam (\textbf{G}eneralist \textbf{La}nguage \textbf{M}odel), which uses a sparsely activated mixture-of-experts architecture to scale the model capacity while also incurring substantially less training cost compared to dense variants. The largest \glam has 1.2 trillion parameters, which is approximately 7x larger than GPT-3. It consumes only 1/3 of the energy used to train GPT-3 and requires half of the computation flops for inference, while still achieving better overall fewshot performance across 29 NLP tasks. Nan Du 0002, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Simon Tong, Dmitry Lepikhin, Yuanzhong Xu, Maxim Krikun, Yanqi Zhou, Adams Wei Yu, Orhan Firat, Barret Zoph, William Fedus, Maarten Bosma, Zongwei Zhou, Yu Emma Wang, Kellie Webster, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Toju Duke, Lucas Dixon, Kun Zhang 0043, Quoc V. Le, Claire Cui |
ICML | 12 |
| 2022 | Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient SparsityabstractIn deep learning, models typically reuse the same parameters for all inputs. Mixture of Experts (MoE) models defy this and instead select different parameters for each incoming example. The result is a sparsely-activated model---with an outrageous number of parameters---but a constant computational cost. However, despite several notable successes of MoE, widespread adoption has been hindered by complexity, communication costs, and training instability. We address these with the introduction of the Switch Transformer. We simplify the MoE routing algorithm and design intuitive improved models with reduced communication and computational costs. Our proposed training techniques mitigate the instabilities, and we show large sparse models may be trained, for the first time, with lower precision (bfloat16) formats. We design models based off T5-Base and T5-Large to obtain up to 7x increases in pre-training speed with the same computational resources. These improvements extend into multilingual settings where we measure gains over the mT5-Base version across all 101 languages. Finally, we advance the current scale of language models by pre-training up to trillion parameter models on the "Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus", and achieve a 4x speedup over the T5-XXL model. William Fedus, Barret Zoph, Noam Shazeer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?abstractSharan Narang, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Liam Fedus, Thibault Fevry, Michael Matena, Karishma Malkan, Noah Fiedel, Noam Shazeer, Zhenzhong Lan, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, Nan Ding, Jake Marcus, Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021. Sharan Narang, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Thibault Févry, Michael Matena, Karishma Malkan, Noah Fiedel, Noam Shazeer, Zhen-Zhong Lan, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li 0133, Nan Ding 0002, Jake Marcus, Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2021 | Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling StrategiesabstractNovel computer vision architectures monopolize the spotlight, but the impact of the model architecture is often conflated with simultaneous changes to training methodology and scaling strategies.Our work revisits the canonical ResNet and studies these three aspects in an effort to disentangle them. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that training and scaling strategies may matter more than architectural changes, and further, that the resulting ResNets match recent state-of-the-art models. We show that the best performing scaling strategy depends on the training regime and offer two new scaling strategies: (1) scale model depth in regimes where overfitting can occur (width scaling is preferable otherwise); (2) increase image resolution more slowly than previously recommended.Using improved training and scaling strategies, we design a family of ResNet architectures, ResNet-RS, which are 1.7x - 2.7x faster than EfficientNets on TPUs, while achieving similar accuracies on ImageNet. In a large-scale semi-supervised learning setup, ResNet-RS achieves 86.2% top-1 ImageNet accuracy, while being 4.7x faster than EfficientNet-NoisyStudent. The training techniques improve transfer performance on a suite of downstream tasks (rivaling state-of-the-art self-supervised algorithms) and extend to video classification on Kinetics-400. We recommend practitioners use these simple revised ResNets as baselines for future research. Irwan Bello, William Fedus, Xianzhi Du, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Aravind Srinivas, Tsung-Yi Lin, Jonathon Shlens, Barret Zoph |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Algorithmic Improvements for Deep Reinforcement Learning Applied to Interactive FictionabstractText-based games are a natural challenge domain for deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Their state and action spaces are combinatorially large, their reward function is sparse, and they are partially observable: the agent is informed of the consequences of its actions through textual feedback. In this paper we emphasize this latter point and consider the design of a deep reinforcement learning agent that can play from feedback alone. Our design recognizes and takes advantage of the structural characteristics of text-based games. We first propose a contextualisation mechanism, based on accumulated reward, which simplifies the learning problem and mitigates partial observability. We then study different methods that rely on the notion that most actions are ineffectual in any given situation, following Zahavy et al.'s idea of an admissible action. We evaluate these techniques in a series of text-based games of increasing difficulty based on the TextWorld framework, as well as the iconic game Zork. Empirically, we find that these techniques improve the performance of a baseline deep reinforcement learning agent applied to text-based games. William Fedus, Hugo Larochelle, Doina Precup, Marc G. Bellemare |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Language GANs Falling Short
Massimo Caccia, Lucas Caccia, William Fedus, Hugo Larochelle, Joelle Pineau, Laurent Charlin |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | On Bonus Based Exploration Methods In The Arcade Learning Environment
Adrien Ali Taïga, William Fedus, Marlos C. Machado, Aaron C. Courville, Marc G. Bellemare |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience ReplayabstractExperience replay is central to off-policy algorithms in deep reinforcement learning (RL), but there remain significant gaps in our understanding. We therefore present a systematic and extensive analysis of experience replay in Q-learning methods, focusing on two fundamental properties: the replay capacity and the ratio of learning updates to experience collected (replay ratio). Our additive and ablative studies upend conventional wisdom around experience replay {—} greater capacity is found to substantially increase the performance of certain algorithms, while leaving others unaffected. Counterintuitively we show that theoretically ungrounded, uncorrected n-step returns are uniquely beneficial while other techniques confer limited benefit for sifting through larger memory. Separately, by directly controlling the replay ratio we contextualize previous observations in the literature and empirically measure its importance across a variety of deep RL algorithms. Finally, we conclude by testing a set of hypotheses on the nature of these performance benefits. William Fedus, Prajit Ramachandran, Rishabh Agarwal, Yoshua Bengio, Hugo Larochelle, Mark Rowland 0001, Will Dabney |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Recall Traces: Backtracking Models for Efficient Reinforcement Learning
Anirudh Goyal, Philemon Brakel, William Fedus, Soumye Singhal, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Sergey Levine, Hugo Larochelle, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2019 | Deep Graph Infomax
Petar Velickovic, William Fedus, William L. Hamilton, Pietro Liò, Yoshua Bengio, R. Devon Hjelm |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | MaskGAN: Better Text Generation via Filling in the _______
William Fedus, Ian J. Goodfellow, Andrew M. Dai |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Many Paths to Equilibrium: GANs Do Not Need to Decrease a Divergence At Every Step
William Fedus, Mihaela Rosca, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Andrew M. Dai, Shakir Mohamed, Ian J. Goodfellow |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |